Literature DB >> 17495488

Impact of additional sampling in the TRUS-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Konstantinos Stamatiou1, Alevizos Alevizos, Vasilisa Karanasiou, Anargiros Mariolis, Constantinos Mihas, Marek Papathanasiou, Konstantinos Bovis, Frangiskos Sofras.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the diagnostic value of 10+ systematic sampling technique when performing transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy, compared with the sextant biopsy technique for patients with suspected prostate cancer.
METHODS: 286 patients with suspected prostate cancer were included in the study. Patients were eligible for the study if they had serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >4 ng/ml or ratio PSA <0.25 and/or an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE). The population sample was divided in three groups: (1) those with positive PSA, PSA ratio and DRE (70 patients); (2) those with positive PSA and PSA ratio but normal DRE (178 patients), and (3) those with positive PSA and PSA ratio, positive PSA velocity and a negative biopsy in the previous 6-month period (38 patients). In addition to the conventional sextant prostate biopsy cores, four more biopsies were obtained from the lateral peripheral zone (10 core biopsy protocol). Additional cores (total of 12-14) were also randomly selected in case of larger prostates (>60 ml) or from suspicious foci revealed by transrectal ultrasound. All additional biopsy cores were submitted separately to the pathological department.
RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 55.7% (39/70) and 69% (48/70) of the patients (for sextant core and for the extended biopsy protocols, respectively) in the first study group, 11% (20/178) and 23% (41/178) of the patients (for the sextant and the extended biopsy protocols, respectively) in the second study group, and 42% (16/38) and 63% (24/38) of the patients (for the sextant and the extended biopsy protocols, respectively) in the third study group. The addition of the lateral peripheral zone (PZ) of the prostate to the sextant biopsy showed a 23, 105 and 50% increase in the number of cancers diagnosed in the first, second and third study groups, respectively. The improvement of cancer detection rate (sensitivity) was statistically significant for all groups evaluated.
CONCLUSION: The 10+ systematic TRUS-guided prostate biopsy improves the detection rate of prostate cancer compared to the sextant biopsy technique alone, especially when performed in men with positive PSA, PSA ratio, and negative DRE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17495488     DOI: 10.1159/000100834

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  13 in total

Review 1.  New horizons in prostate cancer imaging.

Authors:  Gregory Ravizzini; Baris Turkbey; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 2.  Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments.

Authors:  Baris Turkbey; Paul S Albert; Karen Kurdziel; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Customized Tool for the Validation of Optical Coherence Tomography in Differentiation of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  B G Muller; A Swaan; D M de Bruin; W van den Bos; A W Schreurs; D J Faber; E C H Zwartkruis; L Rozendaal; A N Vis; J A Nieuwenhuijzen; R J A van Moorselaar; T G van Leeuwen; J J M C H de la Rosette
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-07-07

4.  Current prostate biopsy protocols cannot reliably identify patients for focal therapy: correlation of low-risk prostate cancer on biopsy with radical prostatectomy findings.

Authors:  Philip Quann; David F Jarrard; Wei Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2010-03-30

5.  Sampling the spatial patterns of cancer: optimized biopsy procedures for estimating prostate cancer volume and Gleason Score.

Authors:  Yangming Ou; Dinggang Shen; Jianchao Zeng; Leon Sun; Judd Moul; Christos Davatzikos
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-05-23       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal Ultrasonography; The Optimal Number of Cores Regarding Cancer Detection Rate and Complications.

Authors:  Mahyar Ghafoori; Meysam Velayati; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Madjid Shakiba; Manijeh Alavi
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 0.212

7.  A prostate biopsy strategy based on a new clinical nomogram reduces the number of biopsy cores required in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Yuan Huang; Gong Cheng; Bianjiang Liu; Pengfei Shao; Chao Qin; Jie Li; Lixin Hua; Changjun Yin
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2014-01-11       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Mean sojourn time, overdiagnosis, and reduction in advanced stage prostate cancer due to screening with PSA: implications of sojourn time on screening.

Authors:  N Pashayan; S W Duffy; P Pharoah; D Greenberg; J Donovan; R M Martin; F Hamdy; D E Neal
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Population based prostate cancer screening in north Mexico reveals a high prevalence of aggressive tumors in detected cases.

Authors:  Lauro S Gomez-Guerra; Margarita L Martinez-Fierro; Valeria Alcantara-Aragon; Rocio Ortiz-Lopez; Rebeca T Martinez-Villarreal; Idelma B Morales-Rodriguez; Raquel Garza-Guajardo; Marco A Ponce-Camacho; Augusto Rojas-Martinez
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Systematic 12- and 13-core transrectal ultrasound- or magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies significantly improve prostate cancer detection rate: A single-center 13-year experience.

Authors:  Gong Cheng; Yuan Huang; Bianjiang Liu; Ruizhe Zhao; Pengfei Shao; Jie Li; Chao Qin; Lixin Hua; Changjun Yin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.