Literature DB >> 17495292

Complications of spinal instrumentation.

Phillip M Young1, Thomas H Berquist, Laura W Bancroft, Jeffrey J Peterson.   

Abstract

Despite tremendous technical advances in spine surgery in recent decades, patients may experience residual or recurrent pain and other symptoms after such surgery. The standard history and physical examination have only limited utility for assessing the postoperative anatomy, and radiologists can play an important role in diagnosing complications and guiding postoperative care. To do so effectively, they must be familiar with the imaging features of successful and unsuccessful fusion, instrumentation fracture and loosening, complications due to faulty hardware placement, and postoperative infection. A basic knowledge of spinal biomechanics and common approaches to surgical instrumentation also may help radiologists anticipate and identify complications. (c) RSNA, 2007.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17495292     DOI: 10.1148/rg.273065055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  31 in total

1.  Metallic artefact reduction with monoenergetic dual-energy CT: systematic ex vivo evaluation of posterior spinal fusion implants from various vendors and different spine levels.

Authors:  R Guggenberger; S Winklhofer; G Osterhoff; G A Wanner; M Fortunati; G Andreisek; H Alkadhi; P Stolzmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Provocation lumbar diskography at previously fused levels.

Authors:  H S Dulai; W S Bartynski; W S Rothfus; P C Gerszten
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 3.  A Narrative Review of Lumbar Fusion Surgery With Relevance to Chiropractic Practice.

Authors:  Clinton J Daniels; Pamela J Wakefield; Glenn A Bub; James D Toombs
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-10-18

4.  The role of bone SPECT/CT in patients with persistent or recurrent lumbar pain following lumbar spine stabilization surgery.

Authors:  Khulood Al-Riyami; Stefan Vöö; Gopinath Gnanasegaran; Ian Pressney; Adam Meir; Adrian Casey; Sean Molloy; James Allibone; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Instrumented Spinal Stabilization without Fusion for Spinal Metastatic Disease.

Authors:  Dori Drakhshandeh; James A Miller; Andrew J Fabiano
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Capacitive coupling reduces instrumentation-related infection in rabbit spines: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mohit Gilotra; Cullen Griffith; Jason Schiavone; Naren Nimmagadda; Jenna Noveau; Steven C Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: review and update for radiologists.

Authors:  Kimia Khalatbari Kani; Felix S Chew
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  Approach to interpret images produced by new generations of multidetector CT scanners in post-operative spine.

Authors:  Rania Zeitoun; Manar Hussein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training.

Authors:  Ali Alaraj; Fady T Charbel; Daniel Birk; Matthew Tobin; Mathew Tobin; Cristian Luciano; Pat P Banerjee; Silvio Rizzi; Jeff Sorenson; Kevin Foley; Konstantin Slavin; Ben Roitberg
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  CT Metal Artifact Reduction in the Spine: Can an Iterative Reconstruction Technique Improve Visualization?

Authors:  A L Kotsenas; G J Michalak; D R DeLone; F E Diehn; K Grant; A F Halaweish; A Krauss; R Raupach; B Schmidt; C H McCollough; J G Fletcher
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.