Literature DB >> 17495008

Three distinct modes of intron dynamics in the evolution of eukaryotes.

Liran Carmel1, Yuri I Wolf, Igor B Rogozin, Eugene V Koonin.   

Abstract

Several contrasting scenarios have been proposed for the origin and evolution of spliceosomal introns, a hallmark of eukaryotic genes. A comprehensive probabilistic model to obtain a definitive reconstruction of intron evolution was developed and applied to 391 sets of conserved genes from 19 eukaryotic species. It is inferred that a relatively high intron density was reached early, i.e., the last common ancestor of eukaryotes contained >2.15 introns/kilobase, and the last common ancestor of multicellular life forms harbored approximately 3.4 introns/kilobase, a greater intron density than in most of the extant fungi and in some animals. The rates of intron gain and intron loss appear to have been dropping during the last approximately 1.3 billion years, with the decline in the gain rate being much steeper. Eukaryotic lineages exhibit three distinct modes of evolution of the intron-exon structure. The primary, balanced mode, apparently, operates in all lineages. In this mode, intron gain and loss are strongly and positively correlated, in contrast to previous reports on inverse correlation between these processes. The second mode involves an elevated rate of intron loss and is prevalent in several lineages, such as fungi and insects. The third mode, characterized by elevated rate of intron gain, is seen only in deep branches of the tree, indicating that bursts of intron invasion occurred at key points in eukaryotic evolution, such as the origin of animals. Intron dynamics could depend on multiple mechanisms, and in the balanced mode, gain and loss of introns might share common mechanistic features.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17495008      PMCID: PMC1899114          DOI: 10.1101/gr.6438607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  57 in total

1.  Intron sliding in conserved gene families.

Authors:  I B Rogozin; J Lyons-Weiler; E V Koonin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Intron evolution as a population-genetic process.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  An extensive network of coupling among gene expression machines.

Authors:  Tom Maniatis; Robin Reed
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-04-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A structural EM algorithm for phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  Nir Friedman; Matan Ninio; Itsik Pe'er; Tal Pupko
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.479

5.  Phylogenetic estimation of context-dependent substitution rates by maximum likelihood.

Authors:  Adam Siepel; David Haussler
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Intron presence-absence polymorphism in Drosophila driven by positive Darwinian selection.

Authors:  Ana Llopart; Josep M Comeron; Frédéric G Brunet; Daniel Lachaise; Manyuan Long
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The evolutionary gain of spliceosomal introns: sequence and phase preferences.

Authors:  Wei-Gang Qiu; Nick Schisler; Arlin Stoltzfus
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 8.  Introns: evolution and function.

Authors:  J S Mattick
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.578

9.  Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods.

Authors:  Z Yang
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.395

10.  A spliceosomal intron in Giardia lamblia.

Authors:  Julie E J Nixon; Amy Wang; Hilary G Morrison; Andrew G McArthur; Mitchell L Sogin; Brendan J Loftus; John Samuelson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  88 in total

1.  A model of genetic search for beneficial mutations: estimating the constructive capacities of mutagenesis.

Authors:  Grigory G Ananko
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Intron creation and DNA repair.

Authors:  Hermann Ragg
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 3.  Alternative splicing and evolution: diversification, exon definition and function.

Authors:  Hadas Keren; Galit Lev-Maor; Gil Ast
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Evaluation of models of the mechanisms underlying intron loss and gain in Aspergillus fungi.

Authors:  Lei-Ying Zhang; Yu-Fei Yang; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Large-scale comparative analysis of splicing signals and their corresponding splicing factors in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Schraga H Schwartz; João Silva; David Burstein; Tal Pupko; Eduardo Eyras; Gil Ast
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Evolutionarily conserved genes preferentially accumulate introns.

Authors:  Liran Carmel; Igor B Rogozin; Yuri I Wolf; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Evolution of protein domain promiscuity in eukaryotes.

Authors:  Malay Kumar Basu; Liran Carmel; Igor B Rogozin; Eugene V Koonin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  Positive Darwinian selection and the birth of an olfactory receptor clade in teleosts.

Authors:  Ashiq Hussain; Luis R Saraiva; Sigrun I Korsching
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Frequency of intron loss correlates with processed pseudogene abundance: a novel strategy to test the reverse transcriptase model of intron loss.

Authors:  Tao Zhu; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Extensive, recent intron gains in Daphnia populations.

Authors:  Wenli Li; Abraham E Tucker; Way Sung; W Kelley Thomas; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-11-27       Impact factor: 47.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.