Literature DB >> 15014153

The evolutionary gain of spliceosomal introns: sequence and phase preferences.

Wei-Gang Qiu1, Nick Schisler, Arlin Stoltzfus.   

Abstract

Theories regarding the evolution of spliceosomal introns differ in the extent to which the distribution of introns reflects either a formative role in the evolution of protein-coding genes or the adventitious gain of genetic elements. Here, systematic methods are used to assess the causes of the present-day distribution of introns in 10 families of eukaryotic protein-coding genes comprising 1,868 introns in 488 distinct alignment positions. The history of intron evolution inferred using a probabilistic model that allows ancestral inheritance of introns, gain of introns, and loss of introns reveals that the vast majority of introns in these eukaryotic gene families were not inherited from the most recent common ancestral genes, but were gained subsequently. Furthermore, among inferred events of intron gain that meet strict criteria of reliability, the distribution of sites of gain with respect to reading-frame phase shows a 5:3:2 ratio of phases 0, 1 and 2, respectively, and exhibits a nucleotide preference for MAG GT (positions -3 to +2 relative to the site of gain). The nucleotide preferences of intron gain may prove to be the ultimate cause for the phase bias. The phase bias of intron gain is sufficient to account quantitatively for the well-known 5:3:2 bias in phase frequencies among extant introns, a conclusion that holds even when taxonomic heterogeneity in phase patterns is considered. Thus, intron gain accounts for the vast majority of extant introns and for the bias toward phase 0 introns that previously was interpreted as evidence for ancient formative introns.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15014153     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msh120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  66 in total

Review 1.  Worm genomes hold the smoking guns of intron gain.

Authors:  John M Logsdon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Intron creation and DNA repair.

Authors:  Hermann Ragg
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Phylogenetic and exon-intron structure analysis of fungal subtilisins: support for a mixed model of intron evolution.

Authors:  Chengshu Wang; Milton A Typas; Tariq M Butt
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.395

4.  Can codon usage bias explain intron phase distributions and exon symmetry?

Authors:  A Ruvinsky; S T Eskesen; F N Eskesen; L D Hurst
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.395

5.  Complex early genes.

Authors:  Scott W Roy; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Rates of intron loss and gain: implications for early eukaryotic evolution.

Authors:  Scott William Roy; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The exchangeability of amino acids in proteins.

Authors:  Lev Y Yampolsky; Arlin Stoltzfus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Signs of ancient and modern exon-shuffling are correlated to the distribution of ancient and modern domains along proteins.

Authors:  Maria Dulcetti Vibranovski; Noboru Jo Sakabe; Rodrigo Soares de Oliveira; Sandro José de Souza
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  The pattern of intron loss.

Authors:  Scott W Roy; Walter Gilbert
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Intron presence-absence polymorphisms in Daphnia.

Authors:  Angela R Omilian; Douglas G Scofield; Michael Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.