Literature DB >> 23497167

Frequency of intron loss correlates with processed pseudogene abundance: a novel strategy to test the reverse transcriptase model of intron loss.

Tao Zhu1, Deng-Ke Niu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although intron loss in evolution has been described, the mechanism involved is still unclear. Three models have been proposed, the reverse transcriptase (RT) model, genomic deletion model and double-strand-break repair model. The RT model, also termed mRNA-mediated intron loss, suggests that cDNA molecules reverse transcribed from spliced mRNA recombine with genomic DNA causing intron loss. Many studies have attempted to test this model based on its predictions, such as simultaneous loss of adjacent introns, 3'-side bias of intron loss, and germline expression of intron-lost genes. Evidence either supporting or opposing the model has been reported. The mechanism of intron loss proposed in the RT model shares the process of reverse transcription with the formation of processed pseudogenes. If the RT model is correct, genes that have produced more processed pseudogenes are more likely to undergo intron loss.
RESULTS: In the present study, we observed that the frequency of intron loss is correlated with processed pseudogene abundance by analyzing a new dataset of intron loss obtained in mice and rats. Furthermore, we found that mRNA molecules of intron-lost genes are mostly translated on free cytoplasmic ribosomes, a feature shared by mRNA molecules of the parental genes of processed pseudogenes and long interspersed elements. This feature is likely convenient for intron-lost gene mRNA molecules to be reverse transcribed. Analyses of adjacent intron loss, 3'-side bias of intron loss, and germline expression of intron-lost genes also support the RT model.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with previous evidence, the correlation between the abundance of processed pseudogenes and intron loss frequency more directly supports the RT model of intron loss. Exploring such a correlation is a new strategy to test the RT model in organisms with abundant processed pseudogenes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23497167      PMCID: PMC3652778          DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-11-23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Biol        ISSN: 1741-7007            Impact factor:   7.431


  72 in total

1.  Nature and structure of human genes that generate retropseudogenes.

Authors:  I Gonçalves; L Duret; D Mouchiroud
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Evaluation of models of the mechanisms underlying intron loss and gain in Aspergillus fungi.

Authors:  Lei-Ying Zhang; Yu-Fei Yang; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Plasticity of animal genome architecture unmasked by rapid evolution of a pelagic tunicate.

Authors:  France Denoeud; Simon Henriet; Sutada Mungpakdee; Jean-Marc Aury; Corinne Da Silva; Henner Brinkmann; Jana Mikhaleva; Lisbeth Charlotte Olsen; Claire Jubin; Cristian Cañestro; Jean-Marie Bouquet; Gemma Danks; Julie Poulain; Coen Campsteijn; Marcin Adamski; Ismael Cross; Fekadu Yadetie; Matthieu Muffato; Alexandra Louis; Stephen Butcher; Georgia Tsagkogeorga; Anke Konrad; Sarabdeep Singh; Marit Flo Jensen; Evelyne Huynh Cong; Helen Eikeseth-Otteraa; Benjamin Noel; Véronique Anthouard; Betina M Porcel; Rym Kachouri-Lafond; Atsuo Nishino; Matteo Ugolini; Pascal Chourrout; Hiroki Nishida; Rein Aasland; Snehalata Huzurbazar; Eric Westhof; Frédéric Delsuc; Hans Lehrach; Richard Reinhardt; Jean Weissenbach; Scott W Roy; François Artiguenave; John H Postlethwait; J Robert Manak; Eric M Thompson; Olivier Jaillon; Louis Du Pasquier; Pierre Boudinot; David A Liberles; Jean-Nicolas Volff; Hervé Philippe; Boris Lenhard; Hugues Roest Crollius; Patrick Wincker; Daniel Chourrout
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Human LINE retrotransposons generate processed pseudogenes.

Authors:  C Esnault; J Maestre; T Heidmann
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Pseudogenes in yeast?

Authors:  G R Fink
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1987-04-10       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Intron loss and gain in Drosophila.

Authors:  Jasmin Coulombe-Huntington; Jacek Majewski
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-10-27       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 7.  Transcription as a source of genome instability.

Authors:  Nayun Kim; Sue Jinks-Robertson
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  DNA double-strand break repair and the evolution of intron density.

Authors:  Ashley Farlow; Eshwar Meduri; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Comparative analysis of processed ribosomal protein pseudogenes in four mammalian genomes.

Authors:  Suganthi Balasubramanian; Deyou Zheng; Yuen-Jong Liu; Gang Fang; Adam Frankish; Nicholas Carriero; Rebecca Robilotto; Philip Cayting; Mark Gerstein
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2009-01-05       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  OrthoClusterDB: an online platform for synteny blocks.

Authors:  Man-Ping Ng; Ismael A Vergara; Christian Frech; Qingkang Chen; Xinghuo Zeng; Jian Pei; Nansheng Chen
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Brain cell somatic gene recombination and its phylogenetic foundations.

Authors:  Gwendolyn Kaeser; Jerold Chun
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Variations of SSU rDNA group I introns in different isolates of Cordyceps militaris and the loss of an intron during cross-mating.

Authors:  Tiantian Lian; Tao Yang; Junde Sun; Suping Guo; Huaijun Yang; Caihong Dong
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.422

3.  Imprecise intron losses are less frequent than precise intron losses but are not rare in plants.

Authors:  Ming-Yue Ma; Tao Zhu; Xue-Nan Li; Xin-Ran Lan; Heng-Yuan Liu; Yu-Fei Yang; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.540

4.  Recurrent loss of specific introns during angiosperm evolution.

Authors:  Hao Wang; Katrien M Devos; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.917

5.  Localized Retroprocessing as a Model of Intron Loss in the Plant Mitochondrial Genome.

Authors:  Argelia Cuenca; T Gregory Ross; Sean W Graham; Craig F Barrett; Jerrold I Davis; Ole Seberg; Gitte Petersen
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  An integrated and comparative approach towards identification, characterization and functional annotation of candidate genes for drought tolerance in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench).

Authors:  Adugna Abdi Woldesemayat; Peter Van Heusden; Bongani K Ndimba; Alan Christoffels
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.797

7.  Mechanisms of intron loss and gain in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces.

Authors:  Tao Zhu; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Evaluation of the mechanisms of intron loss and gain in the social amoebae Dictyostelium.

Authors:  Ming-Yue Ma; Xun-Ru Che; Andrea Porceddu; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Antagonistic relationships between intron content and codon usage bias of genes in three mosquito species: functional and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  Susanta K Behura; Brajendra K Singh; David W Severson
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 5.183

10.  Intron gain by tandem genomic duplication: a novel case in a potato gene encoding RNA-dependent RNA polymerase.

Authors:  Ming-Yue Ma; Xin-Ran Lan; Deng-Ke Niu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-26       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.