Literature DB >> 17494691

Competitive integration of visual and preparatory signals in the superior colliculus during saccadic programming.

Michael C Dorris1, Etienne Olivier, Doug P Munoz.   

Abstract

Efficient behavior requires that internally specified motor plans be integrated with incoming sensory information. Motor preparation and visual signals converge in the intermediate and deep layers of the superior colliculus (SC) to influence saccade planning and execution; however, the mechanism by which these sometimes conflicting signals are combined remains unclear. We studied this issue by presenting visual distractors as monkeys prepared saccades toward an upcoming target whose timing and location were fully predictable. Monkeys made more distractor-directed errors when the spatial location of visual distractors more closely coincided with the saccadic goal. Concomitant pretarget activity of SC visuomotor neurons, whose response fields were centered on the saccadic goal, was similarly increased by the presentation of nearby distractors and inhibited by the presentation of distant distractors. Finally, subthreshold microstimulation of the SC shifted the pattern of distractor-directed errors away from the saccadic goal toward that specified by the site of stimulation. Together, our results suggest that the likelihood of saccade generation is influenced by the spatial register of internal motor preparation signals and external sensory signals across the topographically organized SC map.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17494691      PMCID: PMC6672386          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4212-06.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  47 in total

1.  Effects of similarity and history on neural mechanisms of visual selection.

Authors:  N P Bichot; J D Schall
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Comparison of saccades perturbed by stimulation of the rostral superior colliculus, the caudal superior colliculus, and the omnipause neuron region.

Authors:  N J Gandhi; E L Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands.

Authors:  J I Gold; M N Shadlen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control.

Authors:  J Theeuwes; A F Kramer; S Hahn; D E Irwin; G J Zelinsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Immediate neural plasticity shapes motor performance.

Authors:  M C Dorris; M Paré; D P Munoz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus.

Authors:  T P Trappenberg; M C Dorris; D P Munoz; R M Klein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-02-15       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  Role of the basal ganglia in the control of purposive saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  O Hikosaka; Y Takikawa; R Kawagoe
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 37.312

8.  Superior colliculus activity related to concurrent processing of saccade goals in a visual search task.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek; Edward L Keller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model.

Authors:  M Usher; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Programming of endogenous and exogenous saccades: evidence for a competitive integration model.

Authors:  Richard Godijn; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  56 in total

1.  Superior colliculus inactivation alters the weighted integration of visual stimuli.

Authors:  Samuel U Nummela; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Midbrain contributions to sensorimotor decision making.

Authors:  Gidon Felsen; Zachary F Mainen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return.

Authors:  Zhiguo Wang; Jason Satel; Raymond M Klein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Bottom-up effects modulate saccadic latencies in well-known eye movement paradigm.

Authors:  Saskia van Stockum; Michael R Macaskill; Tim J Anderson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-08-21

5.  Neural activity in the frontal pursuit area does not underlie pursuit target selection.

Authors:  Shaun Mahaffy; Richard J Krauzlis
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Inhibition of voluntary saccadic eye movement commands by abrupt visual onsets.

Authors:  Jay A Edelman; Kitty Z Xu
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-11-19       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Time course of motor preparation during visual search with flexible stimulus-response association.

Authors:  Husam A Katnani; Neeraj J Gandhi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Motor selection dynamics in FEF explain the reaction time variance of saccades to single targets.

Authors:  Christopher K Hauser; Dantong Zhu; Terrence R Stanford; Emilio Salinas
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Reversal of a distractor effect on saccade target selection after superior colliculus inactivation.

Authors:  Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Perceptual averaging governs antisaccade endpoint bias.

Authors:  Caitlin Gillen; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.