Literature DB >> 12656547

Comparison of loss in lung volume with open versus in-line catheter endotracheal suctioning.

Karen Choong1, Phornlert Chatrkaw, Helena Frndova, Peter N Cox.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Disconnecting the endotracheal tube from the ventilator causes significant loss in lung volume, which is further exacerbated by suctioning. In-line catheter suction systems have putative benefits over open catheter suction by maintaining positive pressure, thereby minimizing hypoxemia and hemodynamic instability. However, there is a theoretical risk of generating large negative airway pressures and auto-cycling of the ventilator with in-line catheter suction systems. We studied the effects on lung volume with both these techniques.
DESIGN: Open, randomized, crossover, clinical trial.
SETTING: Pediatric critical care unit. PATIENTS: Fourteen paralyzed patients, age 6 days to 13 yrs.
INTERVENTIONS: Each patient, acting as his or her own control, was suctioned with an in-line catheter suction system and open catheter suction. Each suction maneuver was standardized. Changes in lung volume were measured by inductance plethysmography. Heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were continuously monitored.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total lung volume loss was greater with open catheter suction compared with in-line catheter suction systems (p = .008). The most significant amount of lung volume loss associated with open catheter suction appears to be related to ventilator disconnection, rather than actual suctioning. Patients with decreased pulmonary compliance (< 0.8 mL/cm H2O/kg) demonstrated a greater loss in lung volume, both absolute and relative, as a result of ventilator disconnection (p = .038 and .006, respectively). Patients suctioned with open catheter suction desaturated to a greater extent than patients suctioned with in-line catheter suction (p = .026). There was evidence of ventilator triggering during the actual suction maneuver in all patients during in-line catheter suctions.
CONCLUSIONS: The most significant loss in lung volume during suctioning occurs primarily during ventilator disconnection. Hence, open catheter suction results in greater lung volume loss when compared with in-line catheter suction. We suggest that in-line catheter suction is preferable, especially in patients with significant lung disease and who require high positive end-expiratory pressures, to avoid alveolar derecruitment and exacerbating hypoxemia during endotracheal tube suctioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12656547     DOI: 10.1097/00130478-200301000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  13 in total

1.  A comparison of the effectiveness of open and closed endotracheal suction.

Authors:  Beverley Copnell; David G Tingay; Nicholas J Kiraly; Magdy Sourial; Michael J Gordon; John F Mills; Colin J Morley; Peter A Dargaville
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The effect of endotracheal suction on regional tidal ventilation and end-expiratory lung volume.

Authors:  D G Tingay; B Copnell; C A Grant; P A Dargaville; K R Dunster; A Schibler
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Effects of open endotracheal suction on lung volume in infants receiving HFOV.

Authors:  D G Tingay; B Copnell; J F Mills; C J Morley; P A Dargaville
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The effects of closed tracheal suctioning plus volume guarantee on cerebral hemodynamics.

Authors:  J R Kaiser; C H Gauss; D K Williams
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Perioperative care following complex laryngotracheal reconstruction in infants and children.

Authors:  Punkaj Gupta; Joseph D Tobias; Sunali Goyal; Jacob E Kuperstock; Sana F Hashmi; Jennifer Shin; Christopher J Hartnick; Natan Noviski
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2010-09

6.  Open and Closed Endotracheal Suctioning and Arterial Blood Gas Values: A Single-Blind Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Azam Faraji; Alireza Khatony; Gholamreza Moradi; Alireza Abdi; Mansour Rezaei
Journal:  Crit Care Res Pract       Date:  2015-09-03

7.  Effect of closed endotracheal suction in high-frequency ventilated premature infants measured with electrical impedance tomography.

Authors:  Mariëtte B van Veenendaal; Martijn Miedema; Frans H C de Jongh; Johanna H van der Lee; Inez Frerichs; Anton H van Kaam
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  A recruitment breath manoeuvre directly after endotracheal suction improves lung function: an experimental study in pigs.

Authors:  Ihsan Kasim; Miklos Gulyas; Birgitta Almgren; Marieann Högman
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.384

9.  The effect of open and closed endotracheal tube suctioning system on respiratory parameters of infants undergoing mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Parvin Taheri; Narges Asgari; Majid Mohammadizadeh; Mehri Golchin
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2012-01

10.  Repeated open endotracheal suctioning causes gradual desaturation but does not exacerbate lung injury compared to closed endotracheal suctioning in a rabbit model of ARDS.

Authors:  Hideaki Sakuramoto; Nobutake Shimojo; Subrina Jesmin; Takeshi Unoki; Junko Kamiyama; Masami Oki; Ken Miya; Satoru Kawano; Taro Mizutani
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.