Literature DB >> 17488107

Characterization of molecular recognition features, MoRFs, and their binding partners.

Vladimir Vacic1, Christopher J Oldfield, Amrita Mohan, Predrag Radivojac, Marc S Cortese, Vladimir N Uversky, A Keith Dunker.   

Abstract

Molecular Recognition Features (MoRFs) are short, interaction-prone segments of protein disorder that undergo disorder-to-order transitions upon specific binding, representing a specific class of intrinsically disordered regions that exhibit molecular recognition and binding functions. MoRFs are common in various proteomes and occupy a unique structural and functional niche in which function is a direct consequence of intrinsic disorder. Example MoRFs collected from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) have been divided into three subtypes according to their structures in the bound state: alpha-MoRFs form alpha-helices, beta-MoRFs form beta-strands, and iota-MoRFs form structures without a regular pattern of backbone hydrogen bonds. These example MoRFs were indicated to be intrinsically disordered in the absence of their binding partners by several criteria. In this study, we used several geometric and physiochemical criteria to examine the properties of 62 alpha-, 20 beta-, and 176 iota-MoRF complex structures. Interface residues were examined by calculating differences in accessible surface area between the complex and isolated monomers. The compositions and physiochemical properties of MoRF and MoRF partner interface residues were compared to the interface residues of homodimers, heterodimers, and antigen-antibody complexes. Our analysis indicates that there are significant differences in residue composition and several geometric and physicochemical properties that can be used to discriminate, with a high degree of accuracy, between various interfaces in protein interaction data sets. Implications of these findings for the development of MoRF-partner interaction predictors are discussed. In addition, structural changes upon MoRF-to-partner complex formation were examined for several illustrative examples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17488107      PMCID: PMC2570643          DOI: 10.1021/pr0701411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteome Res        ISSN: 1535-3893            Impact factor:   4.466


  83 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  What does it mean to be natively unfolded?

Authors:  Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2002-01

3.  Dissecting protein-protein recognition sites.

Authors:  Pinak Chakrabarti; Joël Janin
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2002-05-15

4.  CAPRI: a Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions.

Authors:  Joël Janin; Kim Henrick; John Moult; Lynn Ten Eyck; Michael J E Sternberg; Sandor Vajda; Ilya Vakser; Shoshana J Wodak
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-07-01

5.  Insufficiently dehydrated hydrogen bonds as determinants of protein interactions.

Authors:  Ariel Fernández; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact.

Authors:  T Dandekar; B Snel; M Huynen; P Bork
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 13.807

Review 7.  Enzymes and reactions at the eukaryotic DNA replication fork.

Authors:  R A Bambara; R S Murante; L A Henricksen
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-02-21       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Surface, subunit interfaces and interior of oligomeric proteins.

Authors:  J Janin; S Miller; C Chothia
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1988-11-05       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Structure of the constitutively active double mutant CheYD13K Y106W alone and in complex with a FliM peptide.

Authors:  Collin M Dyer; Michael L Quillin; Andres Campos; Justine Lu; Megan M McEvoy; Andrew C Hausrath; Edwin M Westbrook; Philip Matsumura; Brian W Matthews; Frederick W Dahlquist
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Prediction and functional analysis of native disorder in proteins from the three kingdoms of life.

Authors:  J J Ward; J S Sodhi; L J McGuffin; B F Buxton; D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  185 in total

Review 1.  Allosteric modulators of steroid hormone receptors: structural dynamics and gene regulation.

Authors:  Raj Kumar; Iain J McEwan
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  MoRFpred, a computational tool for sequence-based prediction and characterization of short disorder-to-order transitioning binding regions in proteins.

Authors:  Fatemeh Miri Disfani; Wei-Lun Hsu; Marcin J Mizianty; Christopher J Oldfield; Bin Xue; A Keith Dunker; Vladimir N Uversky; Lukasz Kurgan
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 3.  Fuzzy complexes of myelin basic protein: NMR spectroscopic investigations of a polymorphic organizational linker of the central nervous system.

Authors:  David S Libich; Mumdooh A M Ahmed; Ligang Zhong; Vladimir V Bamm; Vladimir Ladizhansky; George Harauz
Journal:  Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.626

4.  Functional dissection of an intrinsically disordered protein: understanding the roles of different domains of Knr4 protein in protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Adilia Dagkessamanskaia; Fabien Durand; Vladimir N Uversky; Matteo Binda; Frédéric Lopez; Karim El Azzouzi; Jean Marie Francois; Hélène Martin-Yken
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Resolving the ambiguity: Making sense of intrinsic disorder when PDB structures disagree.

Authors:  Shelly DeForte; Vladimir N Uversky
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Plasticity in structural and functional interactions between the phosphoprotein and nucleoprotein of measles virus.

Authors:  Yaoling Shu; Johnny Habchi; Stéphanie Costanzo; André Padilla; Joanna Brunel; Denis Gerlier; Michael Oglesbee; Sonia Longhi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Chromatin condensing functions of the linker histone C-terminal domain are mediated by specific amino acid composition and intrinsic protein disorder.

Authors:  Xu Lu; Barbara Hamkalo; Missag H Parseghian; Jeffrey C Hansen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 8.  The Tail That Wags the Dog: How the Disordered C-Terminal Domain Controls the Transcriptional Activities of the p53 Tumor-Suppressor Protein.

Authors:  Oleg Laptenko; David R Tong; James Manfredi; Carol Prives
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 13.807

9.  Biophysical characterization reveals structural disorder in the developmental transcriptional regulator LBH.

Authors:  Hassan Al-Ali; Megan E Rieger; Kenneth L Seldeen; Thomas K Harris; Amjad Farooq; Karoline J Briegel
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.575

10.  Expression, purification, and characterization of a structurally disordered and functional C-terminal autoinhibitory domain (AID) of the 70 kDa 40S ribosomal protein S6 kinase-1 (S6K1).

Authors:  Timothy J Ragan; Duncan B Ross; Malik M Keshwani; Thomas K Harris
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 1.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.