Literature DB >> 17487215

Parentage and sibship exclusions: higher statistical power with more family members.

J Wang1.   

Abstract

Parentage exclusion probabilities are now routinely calculated in genetic marker-assisted parentage analyses to indicate the statistical power of the analyses achievable for a given set of markers, and to measure the informativeness of a set of markers for parentage inference. Previous formulas invariably assume that parentage is to be sought for a single offspring, while in practice multiple full siblings might be sampled (for example, seeds, eggs or young from a pair of monogamous parents) and their father, mother or both are to be assigned among a number of candidates. In this study, I derive formulas for parentage exclusion probabilities for an arbitrary number (n) of fullsibs, which reduce to previous equations for the special case of n=1. I also derive sibship exclusion probabilities, and investigate the power of differentiating half-sib, avuncular and grandparent-grandoffspring relationships using unlinked autosomal markers among different numbers of tested individuals. Applications of the formulas are demonstrated using both theoretical and empirical data sets of allele frequencies. The results from the study highlight the conclusion that the power of genealogical relationship inferences can be enhanced enormously by analysing multiple individuals for a given set of markers. The equations derived in this study allow more accurate determination of marker information and of the power of a parentage/sibship analysis. In addition, they can be used to guide experimental designs of parentage analyses in selecting markers and determining the number of offspring to be sampled and genotyped.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17487215     DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  13 in total

1.  Parentage and sibship inference from multilocus genotype data under polygamy.

Authors:  J Wang; A W Santure
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Kin assortment in juvenile shoals in wild guppy populations.

Authors:  C Piyapong; R K Butlin; J J Faria; K J Scruton; J Wang; J Krause
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-09-08       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Microsatellite DNA suggests that group size affects sex-biased dispersal patterns in red colobus monkeys.

Authors:  Michael M Miyamoto; Julie M Allen; Jan F Gogarten; Colin A Chapman
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 2.371

4.  An improvement on the maximum likelihood reconstruction of pedigrees from marker data.

Authors:  J Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  An accurate formula to calculate exclusion power of marker sets in parentage assignment.

Authors:  Marc Vandeputte
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  Does sex-biased dispersal account for the lack of geographic and host-associated differentiation in introduced populations of an aphid parasitoid?

Authors:  Francisca Zepeda-Paulo; Blas Lavandero; Frédérique Mahéo; Emilie Dion; Yannick Outreman; Jean-Christophe Simon; Christian C Figueroa
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Parentage assignment with genomic markers: a major advance for understanding and exploiting genetic variation of quantitative traits in farmed aquatic animals.

Authors:  Marc Vandeputte; Pierrick Haffray
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Development of polymorphic microsatellite markers for the Trichoglossus haematodus and cross-species amplification in Trichoglossus moluccanus.

Authors:  Jung-Il Kim; Mustafa Zafer Karagozlu; Hyung-Eun An; Tae-June Choi; Yonggu Yeo; Chang-Bae Kim
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Kin-Aggregations Explain Chaotic Genetic Patchiness, a Commonly Observed Genetic Pattern, in a Marine Fish.

Authors:  Jason D Selwyn; J Derek Hogan; Alan M Downey-Wall; Lauren M Gurski; David S Portnoy; Daniel D Heath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Use of noninvasive 'bug-eggs' to enable comparative inferences on genetic mating system with and without parental information: A study in a cattle egret colony.

Authors:  Carolina Isabel Miño; Elaine Dantas de Souza; Emmanuel Moralez-Silva; Talita Alvarenga Valdes; Vera Lúcia Cortiço Corrêa Rodrigues; Sílvia Nassif Del Lama
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.