Literature DB >> 17484010

Laparoscopic resection of curable colon and rectal cancer: an evidence-based review.

T M Young-Fadok1, R D Fanelli, R R Price, D B Earle.   

Abstract

The initial enthusiastic application of laparoscopic techniques to colorectal surgical procedures was tempered in the early 1990s by reports of tumor implants in the laparoscopic incisions. Substantial evidence has accumulated, including evidence from randomized controlled trials, to support that laparoscopic resection results in oncologic outcomes similar to open resection, when performed by well-trained, experienced surgeons. This review was developed in conjunction with guidelines published by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Data from the surgical literature concerning laparoscopic resection of curable colorectal cancer was evaluated regarding diagnostic evaluation, preoperative preparation, operative techniques, prevention of tumor implants, and training and experience. Recommendations are accompanied by an assessment of the level of supporting evidence available at the time of the development of the guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17484010     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9172-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  69 in total

1.  Port-site metastases after CO(2) laparoscopy. Is aerosolization of tumor cells a pivotal factor?

Authors:  P Wittich; R L Marquet; G Kazemier; H J Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Practice parameters for colon cancer.

Authors:  Daniel Otchy; Neil H Hyman; Clifford Simmang; Thomas Anthony; W Donald Buie; Peter Cataldo; James Church; Jeffrey Cohen; Frederick Dentsman; C Neal Ellis; John W Kilkenny; Clifford Ko; Richard Moore; Charles Orsay; Ronald Place; Janice Rafferty; Jan Rakinic; Paul Savoca; Joe Tjandra; Mark Whiteford
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Gasless laparoscopy may reduce the risk of port-site metastases following laparascopic tumor surgery.

Authors:  D I Watson; G Mathew; T Ellis; C F Baigrie; A M Rofe; G G Jamieson
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1997-02

4.  Laparoscopic-assisted colorectal surgery. Lessons learned from 240 consecutive patients.

Authors:  J W Lumley; G A Fielding; M Rhodes; L K Nathanson; S Siu; R W Stitz
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  Prospective randomized trial of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  J C Santos; J Batista; M T Sirimarco; A S Guimarães; C E Levy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Topical treatments of laparoscopic port sites can decrease the incidence of incision metastasis.

Authors:  N Eshraghi; L L Swanstrom; T Bax; B Jobe; K Horvath; B Sheppard; C Deveney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery.

Authors:  Patrick Fa-Si-Oen; Rudi Roumen; John Buitenweg; Cornelis van de Velde; Dick van Geldere; Hein Putter; Charles Verwaest; Loes Verhoef; Jan-Willem de Waard; Dingeman Swank; Andre D'Hoore; Fred Croiset van Uchelen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Increased tumor establishment and growth after open vs laparoscopic surgery in mice may be related to differences in postoperative T-cell function.

Authors:  J D Allendorf; M Bessler; K D Horvath; M R Marvin; D A Laird; R L Whelan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Abdominal wall recurrence after laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  W C Cirocco; A Schwartzman; R W Golub
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 10.  Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes.

Authors:  J Leroy; F Jamali; L Forbes; M Smith; F Rubino; D Mutter; J Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  5 in total

1.  Isolated rectal cancer surgery: a 2007-2014 population study based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Alessandra Buja; Domenico Mantoan; Gino Sartor; Ferdinando Agresta; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-04-13

2.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery versus open resection for middle and lower rectal cancer: an NTCLES study.

Authors:  Shaotang Li; Pan Chi; Huiming Lin; Xingrong Lu; Ying Huang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted left colectomy for cancer: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Forat Swaid; Gideon Sroka; Hussam Madi; Dan Shteinberg; Mustafa Somri; Ibrahim Matter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Middle and Lower Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Shaotang Li; Feizhao Jiang; Jingfu Tu; Xiaofeng Zheng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Laparoscopic surgery for the curative treatment of rectal cancer: results of a Chinese three-center case-control study.

Authors:  Ke-Feng Ding; Rong Chen; Jian-Li Zhang; Jun Li; Yong-Qiang Xu; Liang Lv; Xiao-Chen Wang; Li-Feng Sun; Jian-Wei Wang; Shu Zheng; Su-Zhan Zhang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.