Literature DB >> 17482939

Incomplete and inconsistent information provided to men making decisions for treatment of early-stage prostate cancer.

Stephanie L Snow1, Rachel L Panton, Lorna J Butler, Derek R Wilke, Robert D H Rutledge, David G Bell, Ricardo A Rendon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is a gap between what patients know about early-stage prostate cancer and what they need to know to make treatment decisions, and whether the information patients receive varies depending on their treating physician.
METHODS: Needs assessment was performed using a questionnaire consisting of 41 statements about early-stage prostate cancer. Statements were divided into six thematic subsets. Participants used a 5-point Likert scale to rate statements in terms of knowledge of the information and importance to a treatment decision. Information gaps were defined as significant difference between the importance and knowledge of an item. Descriptive statistics were used to describe demographic subscale scores. The information gap was analyzed by a paired t test for each thematic subset. One-way analyses of variance were used to detect any differences on the basis of treating physician.
RESULTS: Questionnaires were distributed to 270 men (135 treated by radical prostatectomy, 135 by external beam radiotherapy). The return rate was 51% (138 questionnaires). A statistically significant information gap was found among all six thematic subsets, with five of the six P values less than 0.0001. Statistically significant variation was observed in the amount of information patients received from their treating physicians among four of the thematic subsets.
CONCLUSIONS: There is an information gap between what early-stage prostate cancer patients need to know and the information they receive. Additionally there is a difference in the amount of information provided by different physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17482939     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  12 in total

1.  [Information needs of patients with prostate cancer. Pronounced differences between individuals after diagnosis of localised prostate carcinoma].

Authors:  R Schaffert; P Rüesch; R Gügler; S Fischer; H-P Schmid; P Spörri; M Zurkirchen; R Ruszat
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Pairing physician education with patient activation to improve shared decisions in prostate cancer screening: a cluster randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael S Wilkes; Frank C Day; Malathi Srinivasan; Erin Griffin; Daniel J Tancredi; Julie A Rainwater; Richard L Kravitz; Douglas S Bell; Jerome R Hoffman
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Malignant websites? Analyzing the quality of prostate cancer education web resources.

Authors:  Kevin Kobes; Ilene B Harris; Glenn Regehr; Ara Tekian; Paris-Ann Ingledew
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Meeting the health information needs of prostate cancer patients using personal health records.

Authors:  H H Pai; F Lau; J Barnett; S Jones
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  Helping patients with localized prostate cancer reach treatment decisions.

Authors:  Kathryn Birnie; John Robinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Development of a scale to assess patient misperceptions about treatment choices for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hind A Beydoun; Ravinder Mohan; May A Beydoun; John Davis; Raymond Lance; Paul Schellhammer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 5.588

7.  The influence of distress on knowledge transfer for men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.

Authors:  R B Hovey; K E S Cuthbertson; K A Birnie; J W Robinson; B C Thomas; H F Massfeller; J D Ruether; C Scott
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  Patient preference and the impact of decision-making aids on prostate cancer treatment choices and post-intervention regret.

Authors:  J J Aning; R J Wassersug; S L Goldenberg
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  New study suggests patients with advanced prostate cancer on androgen deprivation therapy need more dialogue with health care provider, especially around cardiovascular risk.

Authors:  Axel Merseburger; Anne Bro Falkenberg; Olga J Kornilova
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-22       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Effectiveness of Decision Aid in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer: a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial at Tertiary Referral Hospitals in an Asia Pacific Country.

Authors:  N B Jalil; P Y Lee; M Z Nor Afiah; K L Abdullah; F N S Mohd Azizi; N N S Abdul Rassip; T A Ong; C J Ng; Y K Lee; A T Cheong; A H Razack; M Saad; A Alip; R Malek; M Sundram; S Omar; J R Sathiyananthan; P Kumar
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2022-02       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.