H H Pai1, F Lau, J Barnett, S Jones. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria, BC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is interest in the use of health information technology in the form of personal health record (phr) systems to support patient needs for health information, care, and decision-making, particularly for patients with distressing, chronic diseases such as prostate cancer (pca). We sought feedback from pca patients who used a phr. METHODS: For 6 months, 22 pca patients in various phases of care at the BC Cancer Agency (bcca) were given access to a secure Web-based phr called provider, which they could use to view their medical records and use a set of support tools. Feedback was obtained using an end-of-study survey on usability, satisfaction, and concerns with provider. Site activity was recorded to assess usage patterns. RESULTS: Of the 17 patients who completed the study, 29% encountered some minor difficulties using provider. No security breaches were known to have occurred. The two most commonly accessed medical records were laboratory test results and transcribed doctor's notes. Of survey respondents, 94% were satisfied with the access to their medical records, 65% said that provider helped to answer their questions, 77% felt that their privacy and confidentiality were preserved, 65% felt that using provider helped them to communicate better with their physicians, 83% found new and useful information that they would not have received by talking to their health care providers, and 88% said that they would continue to use provider. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the notion that phrs can provide cancer patients with timely access to their medical records and health information, and can assist in communication with health care providers, in knowledge generation, and in patient empowerment.
BACKGROUND: There is interest in the use of health information technology in the form of personal health record (phr) systems to support patient needs for health information, care, and decision-making, particularly for patients with distressing, chronic diseases such as prostate cancer (pca). We sought feedback from pca patients who used a phr. METHODS: For 6 months, 22 pca patients in various phases of care at the BC Cancer Agency (bcca) were given access to a secure Web-based phr called provider, which they could use to view their medical records and use a set of support tools. Feedback was obtained using an end-of-study survey on usability, satisfaction, and concerns with provider. Site activity was recorded to assess usage patterns. RESULTS: Of the 17 patients who completed the study, 29% encountered some minor difficulties using provider. No security breaches were known to have occurred. The two most commonly accessed medical records were laboratory test results and transcribed doctor's notes. Of survey respondents, 94% were satisfied with the access to their medical records, 65% said that provider helped to answer their questions, 77% felt that their privacy and confidentiality were preserved, 65% felt that using provider helped them to communicate better with their physicians, 83% found new and useful information that they would not have received by talking to their health care providers, and 88% said that they would continue to use provider. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the notion that phrs can provide cancerpatients with timely access to their medical records and health information, and can assist in communication with health care providers, in knowledge generation, and in patient empowerment.
Entities:
Keywords:
Prostate cancer; electronic medical records; patient portals; personal health records
Authors: Shireesha Dhanireddy; Jan Walker; Lisa Reisch; Natalia Oster; Thomas Delbanco; Joann G Elmore Journal: Health Expect Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker; Sigall K Bell; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Nadine Farag; Henry J Feldman; Roanne Mejilla; Long Ngo; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Neha Trivedi; Elisabeth Vodicka; Suzanne G Leveille Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Stephen E Ross; Laurie A Moore; Mark A Earnest; Loretta Wittevrongel; Chen-Tan Lin Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2004-05-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Marie-Pierre Gagnon; Julie Payne-Gagnon; Erik Breton; Jean-Paul Fortin; Lara Khoury; Lisa Dolovich; David Price; David Wiljer; Gillian Bartlett; Norman Archer Journal: Int J Health Policy Manag Date: 2016-07-01
Authors: Tyrone G Harrison; James Wick; Sofia B Ahmed; Min Jun; Braden J Manns; Robert R Quinn; Marcello Tonelli; Brenda R Hemmelgarn Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2015-06-09
Authors: Ines Baudendistel; Eva Winkler; Martina Kamradt; Gerda Längst; Felicitas Eckrich; Oliver Heinze; Bjoern Bergh; Joachim Szecsenyi; Dominik Ose Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Duaa Aljabri; Adrian Dumitrascu; M Caroline Burton; Launia White; Mahmud Khan; Sudha Xirasagar; Ronnie Horner; James Naessens Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2018-07-27 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Saira Khan; Marquita W Lewis-Thames; Yunan Han; Lindsay Fuzzell; Marvin E Langston; Justin X Moore Journal: Med Care Date: 2020-12 Impact factor: 3.178