Literature DB >> 17481830

Natural and experimental infection of neonatal calves with Clostridium difficile.

Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios1, Henry R Stämpfli, Margaret Stalker, Todd Duffield, J Scott Weese.   

Abstract

Clostridium difficile toxins were associated with calf diarrhea in a recent retrospective study; however, no causal relationship has been prospectively investigated. This infection study tested whether the oral inoculation of neonatal calves with a toxigenic strain of C. difficile (PCR-ribotype 077) results in enteric disease. Fourteen 6-24 h old male colostrums-fed Holstein calves, received either three doses of C. difficile (1.4 x 10(8) +/- 3.5 x 10(8) cfu) (n = 8) or sterile culture broth (n = 6). Calves were euthanized on day 6 or after the onset of diarrhea, whichever came first. Fecal and intestinal samples were blindly cultured for C. difficile, and tested for its toxin A/B (C. difficile TOX A/B II ELISA, Techlab). PCR-ribotyping was used to compare inoculated and recovered isolates. Diarrhea was observed in all control calves and 3/8 of inoculated calves (p = 0.03), but it did not occur in calves that tested positive for C. difficile toxins. Fecal toxins were identified only from two controls. PCR-ribotyping confirmed the presence of C. difficile PCR-ribotype 077 in samples of all inoculated calves, but not from controls. The identification of five other PCR-ribotypes in 3/8 (37.5%) and 2/6 (33.3%) of inoculated and control calves, respectively, indicated early natural infection (< or = 24h of age). Five of 14 cecal samples had C. difficile (p = 0.01). In conclusion, the oral administration of C. difficile PCR-ribotype 077 to neonatal calves resulted in fecal/intestinal colonization but not in detection of toxins, or signs of enteric disease. Further studies are required to investigate the clinical relevance of C. difficile in calves.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17481830      PMCID: PMC7117107          DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.03.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


Introduction

Clostridium difficile is a spore-forming bacterium associated with the development of serious enteric diseases and diarrhea in humans (Pepin et al., 2005). Outbreaks of severe C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD) in humans have increased in frequency worldwide, due in part to the emergence of epidemic strains PCR-ribotypes 017 and 027 (van den Berg et al., 2004, Warny et al., 2005). Recently, the isolation of these and other strains from feces of dairy calves (Rodriguez-Palacios et al., 2006), and from retail meat products in Canada (Rodriguez-Palacios et al., 2007) has raised epidemiologic interest. C. difficile is also considered a pathogen for certain animals, including horses, dogs and pigs (Baverud, 2002, Keel and Songer, 2006). In cattle, a recent retrospective study performed in Canadian farms showed a strong association between the presence of fecal C. difficile toxins and calf diarrhea (Rodriguez-Palacios et al., 2006). However, C. difficile was more frequently isolated from controls (14.9%; 20/134) than from diarrheic calves (7.6%; 11/144) (Rodriguez-Palacios et al., 2006). This finding suggests that a disease-free carrier status might exist. In humans, asymptomatic carriage of toxigenic strains of C. difficile is more common in neonates, whereas disease is more common in elderly (Pepin et al., 2005). In contrast, neonatal foals and piglets are reported to be susceptible to disease (Arroyo et al., 2004, Songer et al., 2000). Despite the recent association between C. difficile toxins and calf diarrhea, the role of C. difficile as a causal pathogen in calves is unknown. In other species, the histological and functional lesions attributable to C. difficile are associated with the local effect of two exotoxins, toxins A and B (Schirmer and Aktories, 2004). A binary toxin (known as CDT) has also been hypothesized to be another virulence cofactor (Geric et al., 2006). An experimental model of disease is desirable to characterize the pathogenicity of C. difficile in calves, and to facilitate studies evaluating therapeutic and preventive measures. Oral infection with C. difficile may induce diarrhea in hamsters (Sambol et al., 2001), foals (Arroyo et al., 2004), and piglets (Songer et al., 2000), but it is unknown if experimental infection would induce disease in ruminants. This study investigated whether the oral administration of a toxigenic strain of C. difficile to neonatal calves would result in fecal and intestinal colonization, development of CDAD, and production of detectable C. difficile toxins in feces and intestinal contents using a commercial ELISA.

Materials and methods

Animals and C. difficile strain

Holstein–Friesian male calves (≤12 h of age), obtained from three farms in fall 2005, were assigned before arrival to two groups. Animals were eligible if calving was normal, and if the calf stood up without assistance within the first 2 h of life. Four litres of colostrum from their dams were fed to calves within 2 h of birth. Calves were transported to an isolation unit and housed in individual pens until the end of the study on day 6. Barrier precautions were used to prevent cross-contamination. Calves were inoculated with C. difficile or placebo if they had no diarrhea at the end of a 6 h observation period and if they tested negative on a fecal ELISA test for C. difficile toxin A/B on arrival (C. difficile TOX A/B II, Techlab, Virginia). If diarrhea occurred before or within 6 h of inoculation, the calf was assigned to a third group for descriptive analysis. Calves were only bottle-fed fresh bovine antibiotic-free whole milk (2 L/12 h). A C. difficile strain (PCR-ribotype 077) which contained genes encoding production of toxin A (tcdA +) and toxin B (tcdB +), but not CDT (cdtB −) or tcdC deletions was used. This strain had been isolated from a diarrheic calf (Rodriguez-Palacios et al., 2006) and is a recognized cause of CDAD in humans. Initially, pure colonies of this strain were incubated anaerobically (37 °C for 48 h) in 50 mL of C. difficile selective broth supplemented with cysteine hydrochloride, moxalactam and norfloxacin (CDMN, Oxoid, England) (Aspinall and Hutchinson, 1992). This broth was used to inoculate bottles with 400 mL of pre-reduced brain heart infusion (BHI, Oxoid, Canada) broth. After 24–36 h of incubation, and centrifugation at 4000 ×  g for 10 min, the sediment was re-suspended in 50 mL of sterile BHI broth, which was administered to the calves within 2 h of preparation. Sterile BHI broth (50 mL) was used as placebo for control calves. Purity and quantification of C. difficile, vegetative cells and spores, were determined for each batch of inoculum on 1 mL aliquots sampled before administration to the calves. Spore quantification was performed after mixing 1 mL aliquots with 96% ethanol (v/v, 30 min), followed by quantitative culture on blood agar.

Experimental infection and follow-up

After initial physical examination, blood samples were obtained for total plasma protein quantification (hand-held refractometer). Fecal samples were collected for C. difficile culture and toxin A/B testing. After 6 h of observation, calves were inoculated every 12 h with three doses of placebo or C. difficile inoculum. Inocula were fed to the calves with their last quarter of milk. Observation and physical exams were performed every 6–12 h by two blinded observers. Fecal samples were collected from the rectum once a day. Diarrhea was defined as the presence of stools with a fecal score of 4 (watery) in a 4-grade system (Larson et al., 1977). Calves were euthanized at the end of the study period on day 6, or after 24 h of the onset of diarrhea or systemic disease (marked depression/dehydration), whichever came first. Samples of intestinal content (5 mL) from duodenum (30 cm from pylorus), ileum (30 cm from cecum), and cecal apex were collected during post-mortem examination by transmural aspiration. Samples were stored at −70 °C until processing. Histological examination of specimens preserved in 10% formaldehyde was conducted using light microscopy and haematoxylin and eosin stain. Lesions were blindly scored (0–3) by a pathologist; an overall additive score was given per intestinal segment. The Animal Care Committee of the University of Guelph approved the protocols of this study.

Laboratory analysis of samples

Testing for C. difficile toxin A/B was performed on feces of days 1, 3, 5 and 6, on samples of intestinal contents using C. difficile TOX A/B II. Readings were performed visually by agreement between two observers: positive and negative controls were used with every run. The isolation of C. difficile from fecal samples (days 1–6) and from intestinal samples was performed using CDMN broth (with 0.1% sodium taurocholate; Oxoid, Canada) and CDMN agar (with 5% laked horse blood; Sigma–Aldrich Inc., Canada). After incubation of 1 mL of samples in 9 mL of CDMN broth for 5–7 days, this broth was mixed with 96% ethanol (v/v, for 30 min) and centrifuged (4000 ×  g for 10 min). Sediments were plated onto CDMN agar and incubated for up to 5 days. Confirmation of suspicious C. difficile colonies (swarming, non-hemolytic), extraction of DNA from pure colonies, and PCR-ribotyping analysis were conducted as previously described (Bidet et al., 1999, Rodriguez-Palacios et al., 2006). Cultures for Salmonella spp., Clostridium perfringens and Escherichia coli was performed on fecal samples of day 2 at the Animal Health Laboratory, University of Guelph. C. perfringens toxins were not investigated. Multiplex PCR genotyping of E. coli isolates was performed using primers for enterotoxigenic (Sta, K99, F41) and verotoxigenic (stx1, stx2, eaeA, hlyA, VETC) markers (Slavic and Gyles, 2005). Qualitative tests for rotavirus type A (RotaScreen Latex, England), and bovine coronavirus (BIO-X Diagnostics, Belgium) were also performed.

Statistical analysis

Sample size estimations (Intercooled Stata v9.0, TX,) based on an 88% success rate after oral C. difficile infection in foals (Arroyo et al., 2004), and an estimated rate of natural calf diarrhea of 20% (Larson et al., 1998), indicated that two groups ≥12 calves would provide adequate study power (73%) if natural diarrhea occurred in ≤25% (3/12) of controls, and if infection induced diarrhea in >83% (10/12) of calves. This study would be terminated if partial results led to reduced study power. Continuous characteristic variables were tested using non-parametric two-sample Wilcoxon rank tests (SAS v9.1, NC). Differences in proportions of dichotomous variables were tested using Fisher's exact test. Measure agreement for categorical variables was estimated via Cohen's κ coefficient. Statistical significance was held at p  < 0.05.

Results

This study was terminated after the inclusion of 14 calves as the first 8 inoculated animals did not develop CDAD (diarrhea and concurrent fecal C. difficile toxins). On arrival, 13 of 14 calves were clinically normal and had no signs of diarrhea; the calf with diarrhea was used for descriptive analysis and euthanized on day 2. One of eight inoculated calves developed diarrhea within 6 h of inoculation; it was used for descriptive analysis, received two more doses of C. difficile, and was monitored until day 6 as its diarrhea improved by day 2. Comparative statistical analysis was conducted with five control and seven inoculated calves. There was no age difference between the groups (mean ± 1S.D.; 17.6 ± 7.4 h, range = 6–28 h, and 12.6 ± 8.1 h, range = 5–24 h, respectively; p  = 0.24), and all calves had adequate plasma protein concentrations (inoculated calves, 73.3 ± 7.1, range = 64–85 g/L; controls, 63.5 ± 3.7, range = 60–70 g/L; p  = 0.07) (Rea et al., 1996). The inocula administered to the calves had a concentration of 1.4 × 108  ± 3.5 × 108  cfu of C. difficile PCR-ribotype 077 organisms (range = 1 × 105, 1 × 109; n  = 15), of which, 7.3 × 104  ± 1.5 × 105  cfu were spores (range = 1 × 102, 4.6 × 105; n  = 10). By the end of the study, 5/5 control calves and 2/7 inoculated calves developed diarrhea (p  = 0.03), but the average length of study was not different between groups (inoculated: 5.7 ± 0.3 days; range = 5.5–6 days; controls: 4.4 ± 1.5 days; range 3–6 days; p  = 0.3). Three of five control calves were euthanized before day 6. In total, 24 and 43 fecal samples were collected from 6 control and 8 inoculated calves, respectively, for C. difficile culture. Of these, 18 and 27 samples, respectively, were processed for C. difficile toxins. All 14 calves tested negative with the toxin ELISA the day of arrival. Toxins were detected in one of the fecal samples tested (1/18 (5.5%) versus 0/27 (0%), p  = 0.4); it was from a control calf with diarrhea on day 3. The ELISA was also positive in one of the intestinal samples tested (1/12 (8.3%) versus 0/16 (0%), p  = 0.43); the ileum of another control calf euthanized on day 3 due to severe diarrhea. C. difficile was isolated from 26/43 (60.5%) fecal samples of the 8 inoculated calves but not from 24 samples of the 6 non-inoculated calves (p  < 0.001). C. difficile was also cultured from 6/42 (14.3%) intestinal samples representing six calves; 2/6 ceca of controls, and 3/8 ceca and 1/8 duodenum of inoculated calves. Isolation of C. difficile was significantly more frequent from cecum (5/14) than collectively from duodenum (1/14) and ileum (0/14) (p  = 0.01) (Table 1 ). A very low measured agreement (κ  < 0.2) was observed when the last fecal culture and the intestinal cultures interpreted in parallel were compared. PCR-ribotyping confirmed that 22/26 (84.6%) fecal and 4/6 (66.6%) intestinal C. difficile isolates were the inoculated PCR-ribotype 077 (Table 1). The remaining six isolates, representing five calves (feces of three inoculated, and ceca of two control calves), showed five different PCR-ribotypes (data not shown). Both control calves harbouring C. difficile in the cecum were euthanized due to severe watery diarrhea on days 2 and 3, but tested negative with the toxin ELISA. These calves were the only animals that tested positive for enterotoxigenic E.coli; and one additionally harboured Salmonella spp. C. perfringens was present in both groups (3/6 control, 5/8 inoculated; p  = 1.0). No verotoxigenic E. coli, rotavirus or coronavirus were identified in the study.
Table 1

Clostridium difficile culture and ELISA toxin A/B results in six controls and eight inoculated calves

Fecal samples (day)
Last fecalaIntestinal samples
123456DuodenumIleumCecum
Controls
 Culture0/6b0/60/50/30/20/20/60/60/62/6c
 ELISA0010000010
 Diarrhea1/64/64/52/31/21/25/6



Inoculated
 Culture3/8c7/8c3/85/86/81/34/81/80/83/8
 ELISA0000000000
 Diarrhea1/82/81/80/80/80/30/8

Result for last fecal sample obtained the day of post-mortem examination.

Number of positive calves/number of calves remaining in the study.

Two of the C. difficile isolates were non-PCR-ribotype 077, the remaining isolates corresponded to the inoculated strain ribotype 077.

Clostridium difficile culture and ELISA toxin A/B results in six controls and eight inoculated calves Result for last fecal sample obtained the day of post-mortem examination. Number of positive calves/number of calves remaining in the study. Two of the C. difficile isolates were non-PCR-ribotype 077, the remaining isolates corresponded to the inoculated strain ribotype 077. Three C. difficile isolates, one PCR-ribotype 077 and two of other ribotypes, were cultured from feces of three calves with <24 h of age, before inoculation. Similarly, two other PCR-ribotypes, cultured from cecum of two controls at 48 and 72 h of age, and from feces of two inoculated calves at 48 h of age, indicated early natural infection. Post-mortem analysis revealed mild-to-moderate non-specific macroscopic changes (intestinal mucosa congestion, increased intestinal fluid content, mesenteric edema and edematous lymph nodes) in 4/6 control and 2/8 inoculated calves (p  = 0.28). Microscopic inflammatory changes were overall mild–moderate, but they were more commonly seen in cecum and ileo-cecal lymph node of inoculated calves (Fig. 1 ). No intestinal ulceration, edema, or mucosal pseudomembranes were identified in inoculated animals.
Fig. 1

Average microscopic inflammatory score (AMIS) of intestinal segments and ileo-cecal lymph node of calves naturally (n = 2) and experimentally (n = 8) infected with Clostridium difficile. AMIS represents the average number of lesions/severity identified per segment. Each segment was given cumulative scores (0–3; mild, moderate, severe) for six indicators of inflammation. Inoculated calves did not have diarrhea at necropsy; but controls did. Ab, abomasum; Du, duodenum; Je, jejunum, Il, ileum; Ce, cecum; Sc; spiral colon; Ln; ileo-cecal lymph node.

Average microscopic inflammatory score (AMIS) of intestinal segments and ileo-cecal lymph node of calves naturally (n = 2) and experimentally (n = 8) infected with Clostridium difficile. AMIS represents the average number of lesions/severity identified per segment. Each segment was given cumulative scores (0–3; mild, moderate, severe) for six indicators of inflammation. Inoculated calves did not have diarrhea at necropsy; but controls did. Ab, abomasum; Du, duodenum; Je, jejunum, Il, ileum; Ce, cecum; Sc; spiral colon; Ln; ileo-cecal lymph node.

Discussion

In this study, oral inoculation of toxigenic C. difficile PCR-ribotype 077 to colostrum-fed neonatal calves resulted in fecal shedding but no detection of C. difficile toxins, or induction of enteric disease for up to 5 days post-inoculation. These finding contrasts previous studies in hamsters, piglets and foals where diarrhea was induced in most animals within 48–72 h of oral infection (Arroyo et al., 2004, Jones et al., 1988, Post et al., 2000, Sambol et al., 2001). It is uncertain if diarrhea would have developed later, if calves had been monitored further. As CDAD in humans occur a few days after discontinuation of antimicrobial therapy (Beaugerie et al., 2003), some models of infection include the concurrent administration of antimicrobials to facilitate the induction of CDAD (Sambol et al., 2002). Antimicrobials were not used in this study as the main objective was to investigate the sole effect of an early ingestion of C. difficile. It is unknown if diarrhea had occurred if these calves had received antimicrobials. However, the failure to induce disease in the absence of antimicrobial therapy indicates a difference in susceptibility compared to neonatal foals (Arroyo et al., 2004), and questions the role of C. difficile as a primary pathogen in calves. It is important to consider, however, that failure to induce disease experimentally does not rule out the possibility that C. difficile is a bovine pathogen. Rather it indicates that simple exposure to C. difficile is not adequate to cause disease. Previous infection studies of adult horses and dogs with toxigenic C. difficile also resulted in fecal shedding but not in signs of enteric disease or fecal detection of C. difficile toxins (Clooten et al., 2003, Gustafsson et al., 2004). Potential explanations for the outcome in these studies may include natural age-dependent resistance, lack of immune-compromising conditions, presence of an established and non-disrupted intestinal flora, and perhaps unknown yet factors inhibiting C. difficile colonization, toxin production, or binding to intestinal cells. Differences in toxin production and virulence across C. difficile strains could also be considered (Warny et al., 2005, Sambol et al., 2001). Although a potential protective effect of milk (impaired adhesion of C. difficile to cells, and inhibition of toxin A mediated cytotoxicity) was suggested in previous in vitro studies (Dallas and Rolfe, 1998, Naaber et al., 1996), the roles of passive immunity and bovine whole milk on the transfer of anti-C. difficile factors to calves is unknown. Considering the wide distribution of C. difficile in the environment (Simango, 2006), the isolation of C. difficile from mature cows (Rodriguez et al., unpublished data), and the common presence of serum titers of anti-C. difficile toxin immunoglobulins in humans (∼70%) (Johnson, 1997), it is plausible that passive immunity might play a protective role for calves. C. difficile was isolated from calves under 24 h of age indicating early natural ingestion of spores. The isolation of PCR-ribotype 077, a strain associated with CDAD in humans, from healthy and diarrheic calves in 2004 (Rodriguez-Palacios et al., 2006), and from the calf that arrived naturally infected to this study suggests this ribotype is circulating in the cattle population, and that calves might be healthy carriers. C. difficile was more frequently isolated from the cecum of calves in both groups. Although there are no comparable studies for C. difficile in calves, the severity of the histological lesions seen in the cecum of infected piglets and hamsters (Borriello and Barclay, 1985, Keel and Songer, 2006) suggest that cecum could be a site for residence of C. difficile in calves. The frequent presence of mild–moderate microscopic inflammatory changes observed in the cecum of inoculated calves compared to the other intestinal segments and two controls might be consistent with such observation (Fig. 1). However, the clinical significance of this finding is uncertain due to limited sample size and the absence of signs of disease. The toxin ELISA test used in this study has been adequately validated for diagnostic purposes in humans (Wilkins and Lyerly, 2003). In animals, despite its regular use in hospital settings, validation studies are scarce. In piglets the ELISA performance approached human standards (Post et al., 2002); but in dogs, it was considered poorly sensitive and specific (Chouicha and Marks, 2006). Validation of available ELISAs is needed to better understand the significance of C. difficile in cattle. This study documented fecal/intestinal colonization for up to 5 days following oral inoculation of calves with a strain of C. difficile. No induction of enteric disease or detection of fecal C. difficile toxins, was observed. Cecum commonly yielded positive C. difficile cultures. PCR-ribotyping showed that calves may naturally harbour C. difficile by 24 h of age. Validation studies for diagnostic immunoassays for toxins are needed. C. difficile should not be ruled out as a potential cause of calf diarrhea.
  27 in total

1.  Toxin production by an emerging strain of Clostridium difficile associated with outbreaks of severe disease in North America and Europe.

Authors:  Michel Warny; Jacques Pepin; Aiqi Fang; George Killgore; Angela Thompson; Jon Brazier; Eric Frost; L Clifford McDonald
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Sep 24-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Antibody responses to clostridial infection in humans.

Authors:  S Johnson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  Increasing risk of relapse after treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis in Quebec, Canada.

Authors:  Jacques Pepin; Marie-Eve Alary; Louis Valiquette; Evelyne Raiche; Joannie Ruel; Katalin Fulop; Dominique Godin; Claude Bourassa
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Evaluation of five enzyme immunoassays compared with the cytotoxicity assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in dogs.

Authors:  Nadira Chouicha; Stanley L Marks
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.279

5.  Colonization for the prevention of Clostridium difficile disease in hamsters.

Authors:  Susan P Sambol; Michelle M Merrigan; Janet K Tang; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  New selective medium for isolating Clostridium difficile from faeces.

Authors:  S T Aspinall; D N Hutchinson
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Protection of hamsters against Clostridium difficile ileocaecitis by prior colonisation with non-pathogenic strains.

Authors:  S P Borriello; F E Barclay
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Binary toxin-producing, large clostridial toxin-negative Clostridium difficile strains are enterotoxic but do not cause disease in hamsters.

Authors:  Barbara Geric; Robert J Carman; Maja Rupnik; Christopher W Genheimer; Susan P Sambol; David M Lyerly; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  Economic evaluation of neonatal health protection programs for cattle.

Authors:  R L Larson; V L Pierce; R F Randle
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 1.936

10.  Clostridium difficile in retail ground meat, Canada.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Henry R Staempfli; Todd Duffield; J Scott Weese
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Clostridium difficile in Food and Animals: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; G Daube
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Transient fecal shedding and limited animal-to-animal transmission of Clostridium difficile by naturally infected finishing feedlot cattle.

Authors:  Alexander Rodriguez-Palacios; Carrie Pickworth; Steve Loerch; Jeffrey T LeJeune
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile in animals.

Authors:  J Scott Weese
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 1.279

4.  Detection and enumeration of Clostridium difficile spores in retail beef and pork.

Authors:  J Scott Weese; Brent P Avery; J Rousseau; Richard J Reid-Smith
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Advances in prevention and therapy of neonatal dairy calf diarrhoea: a systematical review with emphasis on colostrum management and fluid therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa Meganck; Geert Hoflack; Geert Opsomer
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 1.695

6.  The complexity and diversity of the Pathogenicity Locus in Clostridium difficile clade 5.

Authors:  Briony Elliott; Kate E Dingle; Xavier Didelot; Derrick W Crook; Thomas V Riley
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  A possible role for Clostridium difficile in the etiology of calf enteritis.

Authors:  Melissa C Hammitt; Dawn M Bueschel; M Kevin Keel; Robert D Glock; Peder Cuneo; Donald W DeYoung; Carlos Reggiardo; Hien T Trinh; J Glenn Songer
Journal:  Vet Microbiol       Date:  2007-09-18       Impact factor: 3.293

Review 8.  Pathophysiology of diarrhea in calves.

Authors:  D M Foster; Geof W Smith
Journal:  Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 9.  Literature Review: Coinfection in Young Ruminant Livestock-Cryptosporidium spp. and Its Companions.

Authors:  Cora Delling; Arwid Daugschies
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2022-01-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.