Literature DB >> 17478278

Popliteus bypass and popliteofibular ligament reconstructions reduce posterior tibial translations and forces in a posterior cruciate ligament graft.

Keith L Markolf1, Benjamin R Graves, Susan M Sigward, Steven R Jackson, David R McAllister.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the abilities of popliteus tendon (POP) and popliteofibular ligament (PFL) graft reconstructions to limit posterior tibial translations and alter forces in a PCL graft reconstruction after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and lateral collateral ligament (LCL) reconstruction.
METHODS: Fifteen fresh frozen cadaveric knees underwent anterior-posterior (AP) laxity testing with 200 N of applied anterior and posterior tibial force. Forces in the native PCL were recorded during passive extension from 120 degrees to 0 degrees with an applied 100-N posterior tibial force. The popliteus tendon was released at its femoral origin, the PFL and LCL were cut, and the PCL was sectioned, creating a combined grade 3 PCL and posterolateral corner injury. The PCL was reconstructed with a single-bundle inlay graft tensioned to restore intact knee laxity to within 1 mm at 90 degrees , and the LCL was reconstructed with an anatomically placed graft. Testing was repeated with POP and PFL posterolateral reconstructions in addition to the PCL and LCL reconstructions.
RESULTS: PCL + LCL grafts alone matched intact knee laxities between 20 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion; mean laxity was 3.5 mm greater than intact at 0 degrees and 2.2 mm greater at 10 degrees. The addition of a POP reconstruction to PCL + LCL reconstructions significantly reduced AP laxities from -2.4 mm (0 degrees flexion) to -1.4 mm (90 degrees flexion). Mean laxities with POP and PFL grafts were not significantly different from the intact knee or from each other. Mean PCL graft forces with the PCL + LCL reconstructions alone were not significantly different than those with the native PCL. Mean PCL graft forces with POP and PFL reconstructions were not significantly different from each other; both means were significantly less than those for the PCL + LCL reconstructions alone at flexion angles greater than 55 degrees.
CONCLUSIONS: After PCL and LCL reconstruction, the popliteus bypass and popliteofibular ligament reconstructions not only eliminated excessive posterior laxity and returned the knee to a normal laxity profile but also resulted in substantial decreases in PCL graft forces. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results provide further rationale for reconstructing torn posterolateral structures with a grade 3 posterolateral injury in combination with a PCL reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17478278      PMCID: PMC2205994          DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  22 in total

1.  Comparison of 2 surgical techniques of posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee.

Authors:  Thomas Nau; Yan Chevalier; Nicola Hagemeister; Jacques A Deguise; Nicolas Duval
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-09-12       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Biomechanical consequences of replacement of the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar ligament allograft. Part I: insertion of the graft and anterior-posterior testing.

Authors:  K L Markolf; D M Burchfield; M M Shapiro; B R Davis; G A Finerman; J L Slauterbeck
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Biomechanical analysis of a combined double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner reconstruction.

Authors:  Jon K Sekiya; Marcus J Haemmerle; Kathryne J Stabile; Tracy M Vogrin; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee.

Authors:  James P Stannard; Stephen L Brown; James T Robinson; Gerald McGwin; David A Volgas
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The insertion geometry of the posterolateral corner of the knee.

Authors:  J-M Brinkman; P J A Schwering; L Blankevoort; J G Kooloos; J G Koolos; J Luites; A B Wymenga
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-10

6.  Posterolateral corner reconstruction of the knee: surgical technique utilizing a bifid Achilles tendon allograft and a double femoral tunnel.

Authors:  Jon K Sekiya; Christopher A Kurtz
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 7.  Evaluation and treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Authors:  C D Harner; J Höher
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  A biomechanical study of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a graft. Part 1: Isometry, pre-tension of the graft, and anterior-posterior laxity.

Authors:  K L Markolf; J R Slauterbeck; K L Armstrong; M S Shapiro; G A Finerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  3D kinematic in-vitro comparison of posterolateral corner reconstruction techniques in a combined injury model.

Authors:  Thomas Nau; Yan Chevalier; Nicola Hagemeister; Nicolas Duval; Jacques A deGuise
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-02-10       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Posterior cruciate ligament injuries in trauma patients: Part II.

Authors:  G C Fanelli; C J Edson
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.772

View more
  4 in total

1.  Popliteofibular ligament reconstruction for posterolateral external rotation instability of the knee.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Hua Feng; Lei Hong; Xue-Song Wang; Jin Zhang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Tibial inlay technique using hamstring graft for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and remnant revision.

Authors:  Wiroon Laupattarakasem; Manusak Boonard; Pat Laupattarakasem; Weerachai Kosuwon
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2012-12-01

3.  Single-stage arthroscopic-assisted treatment of anteromedial tibial plateau fracture with posterolateral corner injury: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Lingzhi Li; Yuan Li; Yanwei He; Xiangtian Deng; Peng Zhou; Jun Li; Hao Jiang; Zhong Li; Juncai Liu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.562

4.  The External Rotation Radiographic Technique for Posterolateral Injury.

Authors:  João Luiz Ellera Gomes; Matheus Rocha de Aguiar; Luiza Barbosa Horta Barbosa; Nicholas I Kennedy; Márcio B Ferrari
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-11-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.