Literature DB >> 16171629

Reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee.

James P Stannard1, Stephen L Brown, James T Robinson, Gerald McGwin, David A Volgas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe a technique for reconstruction of the posterolateral corner (PLC) of the knee and report the results of a prospective series of patients. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series.
METHODS: Twenty-two patients with PLC injuries underwent reconstruction; 15 patients had multiligamentous knee injuries and 7 had isolated PLC injuries. We used the modified 2-tailed technique that reconstructs the popliteofibular ligament and fibulocollateral ligament. The technique includes use of an allograft tendon placed through transtibial and transfibular bone tunnels and around a screw on the lateral femoral condyle. All patients have been followed-up prospectively with clinical examinations, Lysholm knee scores, KT-2000 ligament arthrometer examinations, and evaluation of work and recreational functional status.
RESULTS: There were 15 male and 7 female patients (mean age, 32 years; range, 17 to 55 years). Follow-up was a minimum of 24 months (mean, 29.5 months; range, 24 to 38 months). Mean range of motion is extension of 0.2 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 5 degrees) and flexion of 133.4 degrees (80 degrees to 144 degrees). The range of motion for the multiligamentous knees was 0.3 degrees to 129 degrees compared with 0 degrees to 143 degrees for knees with isolated corner injuries. Mean Lysholm knee scores were 90 for the entire group with a score of 92 for the multiligamentous knees and 88 for the isolated corners. Stability was clinically graded on a scale of 0 to 3 for both varus stress and external rotation, with a score of 2 or 3 indicating a failed PLC reconstruction. The mean score for varus stress was 0.2 for the whole group, with 0.3 in the multiligamentous knee and 0.1 for the isolated injuries. Similarly, the mean score for external rotation was 0.4, with a 0.5 for multiligamentous knee and 0.3 for isolated PLC injuries. There were 2 failures in the multiligamentous knee injury group (13%), compared with no failures in the isolated PLC group. The failure rate for the whole study was 9%.
CONCLUSIONS: Reconstruction of the PLC using an allograft reconstruction of the popliteus, popliteofibular, and fibulocollateral ligaments yielded a stable reconstruction with excellent functional results. Predictably, range of motion and incidence of failure were both better for patients with isolated PLC injuries than for those with multiligamentous knees. Both groups, however, showed excellent overall functional results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16171629     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  27 in total

1.  Popliteus bypass and popliteofibular ligament reconstructions reduce posterior tibial translations and forces in a posterior cruciate ligament graft.

Authors:  Keith L Markolf; Benjamin R Graves; Susan M Sigward; Steven R Jackson; David R McAllister
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Posterolateral corner reconstruction for posterolateral rotatory instability combined with posterior cruciate ligament injuries: comparison between fibular tunnel and tibial tunnel techniques.

Authors:  Young-Bok Jung; Ho-Joong Jung; Sang Jun Kim; Se-Jin Park; Kwang-Sup Song; Yong Seuk Lee; Sang-Hak Lee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Accuracy and reliability of determining the isometric point of the knee for multiligament knee reconstruction.

Authors:  Jeff R S Leiter; Bruce A Levy; James P Stannard; Gregory C Fanelli; Daniel B Whelan; Robert G Marx; Michael J Stuart; Joel L Boyd; Peter B MacDonald
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and physical exam in assessment of injuries to posterolateral corner of the knee.

Authors:  Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Camilo Partezani Helito; Lucas Archanjo Gury; Marco Kawamura Demange; José Ricardo Pécora; Fábio Janson Angelini
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.513

5.  Surgical treatment and rehabilitation of combined complex ligament injuries.

Authors:  Richard L Romeyn; Jason Jennings; George J Davies
Journal:  N Am J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2008-11

6.  3 T magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; N Biccari; F Mangano; R Toffanin
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

7.  The anatomical relationship of the common peroneal nerve to the proximal fibula and its clinical significance when performing fibular-based posterolateral reconstructions.

Authors:  Erik Hohmann; Reinette Van Zyl; Vaida Glatt; Kevin Tetsworth; Natalie Keough
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Editorial comment: Symposium: management of the dislocated knee.

Authors:  Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee with achilles tendon allograft.

Authors:  Scott A Kuzma; Roxanne M Chow; William M Engasser; Michael J Stuart; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-06-16

10.  Results of isolated posterolateral corner reconstruction.

Authors:  Lawrence Camarda; Vincenzo Condello; Vincenzo Madonna; Fabrizio Cortese; Michele D'Arienzo; Claudio Zorzi
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.