BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques to treat posterolateral knee instability have been described. To date, the recommended treatment is an anatomical form of reconstruction, in which the 3 key structures of the posterolateral corner are addressed: the lateral collateral ligament, the popliteofibular ligament, and the popliteus tendon. HYPOTHESIS: Two methods of surgical reconstruction will restore posterolateral knee instability, in terms of static laxity as well as dynamic 6 degrees of freedom kinematics, to statistically significant levels compared with the intact state. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Two surgical techniques (A and B) were used to reconstruct the posterolateral structures in 10 cadaveric knees. Static tests were performed on the intact, sectioned, and reconstructed knees at 30 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion for anterior-posterior laxity and external rotational laxity, as well as at 0 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion for varus laxity; dynamic 6 degrees of freedom kinematic testing, through a path of motion from 90 degrees of flexion to full extension, was also performed. RESULTS: For the static varus tests, external rotation and varus laxity were significantly increased after the posterolateral structures were cut. Both reconstruction techniques restored external rotation and varus laxity to levels not significantly different from the intact state. For technique B, dynamic testing did not show any significant difference for all degrees of freedom kinematics compared with the intact state. However, for technique A, a significant internal tibial rotation was observed throughout the entire path of motion from 0 degrees to 90 degrees of knee flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical techniques for anatomical posterolateral corner reconstruction showed good results in the static laxity tests. The anatomical reconstruction of all structures, including the popliteus tendon, resulted in an abnormal internal tibial rotation during dynamic testing.
BACKGROUND: Various surgical techniques to treat posterolateral knee instability have been described. To date, the recommended treatment is an anatomical form of reconstruction, in which the 3 key structures of the posterolateral corner are addressed: the lateral collateral ligament, the popliteofibular ligament, and the popliteus tendon. HYPOTHESIS: Two methods of surgical reconstruction will restore posterolateral knee instability, in terms of static laxity as well as dynamic 6 degrees of freedom kinematics, to statistically significant levels compared with the intact state. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Two surgical techniques (A and B) were used to reconstruct the posterolateral structures in 10 cadaveric knees. Static tests were performed on the intact, sectioned, and reconstructed knees at 30 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion for anterior-posterior laxity and external rotational laxity, as well as at 0 degrees and 30 degrees of flexion for varus laxity; dynamic 6 degrees of freedom kinematic testing, through a path of motion from 90 degrees of flexion to full extension, was also performed. RESULTS: For the static varus tests, external rotation and varus laxity were significantly increased after the posterolateral structures were cut. Both reconstruction techniques restored external rotation and varus laxity to levels not significantly different from the intact state. For technique B, dynamic testing did not show any significant difference for all degrees of freedom kinematics compared with the intact state. However, for technique A, a significant internal tibial rotation was observed throughout the entire path of motion from 0 degrees to 90 degrees of knee flexion. CONCLUSIONS: Both surgical techniques for anatomical posterolateral corner reconstruction showed good results in the static laxity tests. The anatomical reconstruction of all structures, including the popliteus tendon, resulted in an abnormal internal tibial rotation during dynamic testing.
Authors: Keith L Markolf; Benjamin R Graves; Susan M Sigward; Steven R Jackson; David R McAllister Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: M Thaunat; C Pioger; R Chatellard; J Conteduca; A Khaleel; B Sonnery-Cottet Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-08-31 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Jae-Hyuk Yang; Hong Chul Lim; Ji Hoon Bae; Harry Fernandez; Tae Soo Bae; Joon Ho Wang Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Thomas L Sanders; Nick R Johnson; Ayoosh Pareek; Aaron J Krych; Robert G Marx; Michael J Stuart; Bruce A Levy Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2017-07-06 Impact factor: 4.342