Literature DB >> 1747671

Vision screening in preschool children: comparison of orthoptists and clinical medical officers as primary screeners.

P G Bolger1, S L Stewart-Brown, E Newcombe, A Starbuck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To see if there were differences in referral rates and abnormalities detected from two areas that were operating different preschool vision screening programmes.
DESIGN: Cohort study using case notes of referrals.
SETTING: Community based secondary referral centres in the county of Avon. PATIENTS: 263 referrals from a child population of 7105 in Southmead district, an area that used orthoptists as primary vision screeners; 111 referrals from a child population of 2977 in Weston-super-Mare, an area that used clinical medical officers for screening. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Amblyopia and squint detection rates, together with false positive referral rates.
RESULTS: The amblyopia detection rate in Southmead district was significantly higher than in Weston-super-Mare (11/1000 children v 5/1000), as was the detection rate of squint (11/1000 v 3/1000). However, the false positive referral rate from Southmead was significantly lower than that from Weston-super-Mare (9/1000 v 23/1000).
CONCLUSION: Preschool vision screening using orthoptists as primary screeners offers a more effective method of detecting visual abnormalities than using clinical medical officers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1747671      PMCID: PMC1671394          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.303.6813.1291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  20 in total

1.  Developmental paediatrics in primary care: what should we teach?

Authors:  G Baird; D M Hall
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-08-31

2.  Success in ambylopia therapy as a function of age: a literature survey.

Authors:  M H Birnbaum; K Koslowe; R Sanet
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1977-05

3.  Preschool vision screening: a service in need of rationalisation.

Authors:  S L Stewart-Brown; M N Haslum; B Howlett
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Children referred from school vision screening.

Authors:  R Bosanquet; P Hanney; J Eastaugh; J Crocker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-06-10

5.  Amblyopia.

Authors:  R M Ingram
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-01-28

6.  The application of a comprehensive visual screening programme to children aged 3-5 years. Can a modified procedure be devised for visual screening by ancillary staff?

Authors:  S Dholakia
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Epidemiology of strabismus.

Authors:  P A Graham
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 8.  Amblyopia: definition, classification, diagnosis, and management considerations for pediatricians, family physicians, and general practitioners.

Authors:  D S Friendly
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.278

9.  Vision screening at 8 and 18 months. Steering Committee of Oxford Region Child Development Project.

Authors:  A Johnson; M Stayte; C Wortham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-08-26

10.  Children referred for pleoptic treatment. A survey on aspects considering referral for examination, role of screening programmes, previous therapy and compliance.

Authors:  M Somersalo; H Erkkilä
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1988-10
View more
  12 in total

1.  Preschool hearing, speech, language, and vision screening.

Authors:  J Bamford; A Davis; J Boyle; J Law; S Chapman; S S Brown; T A Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1998-12

2.  Preschool vision screening: negative predictive value for amblyopia.

Authors:  D K Newman; M M East
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: observational data from a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  C Williams; K Northstone; R A Harrad; J M Sparrow; I Harvey
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Vision screening in preschool children.

Authors:  R M Ingram
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-25

5.  Vision screening in preschool children.

Authors:  M M Madlom
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-01-25

6.  Ophthalmic Abnormalities among Children Treated with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Ziya Ayhan; Serpil Mungan Durankaya; Gül Arıkan; Günay Kırkım; Aslı Çakır Çetin; Yüksel Olgun; Üzeyir Günenç; Enis Alpin Güneri
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.017

7.  Is community screening for amblyopia possible, or appropriate?

Authors:  M C Wright; D J Colville; F Oberklaid
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Amblyopia: could we do better?

Authors:  G Woodruff
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-05-06

9.  Preschool vision screening: outcome of children referred to the hospital eye service.

Authors:  D K Newman; A Hitchcock; H McCarthy; J Keast-Butler; A T Moore
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Design of the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS).

Authors:  C E Stewart; A R Fielder; D A Stephens; M J Moseley
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.