Literature DB >> 7492153

Is community screening for amblyopia possible, or appropriate?

M C Wright1, D J Colville, F Oberklaid.   

Abstract

Photoscreeners are becoming increasingly available and are being widely used to screen for visual abnormalities in young children. However, consideration of accepted criteria for screening programs indicates there is still much further research that needs to be carried out before amblyopia screening could be recommended as a routine component of a community health surveillance program--an adequate description of the potential consequences of an individual developing amblyopia has yet to be provided and the natural history of the condition and factors that determine the effectiveness of treatment have yet to be fully described. While there is the promise of technology that satisfies specific test requirements, this still needs to be trialed in community settings and community trials are required before it will be possible to determine whether the costs that will be incurred in carrying out routine screening and in providing the resources for treatment are warranted. In conclusion, the development of new and possibly more effective technology for screening is only part of the answer to the amblyopia question. While superficially this technology makes screening for amblyopia a possibility, we do not know at this stage whether or not it is appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7492153      PMCID: PMC1511287          DOI: 10.1136/adc.73.3.192

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  17 in total

Review 1.  Vision/eye screening: test twice and refer once.

Authors:  P E Romano
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 1.132

2.  Chronic physical illness in childhood: psychological and social effects in adolescence and adult life.

Authors:  I B Pless; H A Cripps; J M Davies; M E Wadsworth
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 5.449

3.  Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  F Bowling; G Cleghorn; A Chester; J Curran; B Griffin; J Prado; P Francis; R Shepherd
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Validation of screening procedures.

Authors:  A L Cochrane; W W Holland
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1971-01       Impact factor: 4.291

5.  A model outreach program for health care screening.

Authors:  J M Goon; D K Berger
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.812

6.  Two-flash photorefraction in screening of amblyogenic refractive errors.

Authors:  K A Kaakinen; H O Kaseva; H H Teir
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Assessment of visual acuity in toddlers.

Authors:  M A McDonald
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

8.  Amblyopia. Diagnosis and management.

Authors:  S E Rubin; L B Nelson
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.278

9.  Incidence of loss of vision in the healthy eye in amblyopia.

Authors:  V Tommila; A Tarkkanen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 4.638

10.  Eccentric photorefraction: improving the predictive value and yield in detection of refractive errors.

Authors:  R J Dortmans; B S McKenny; G A Gole
Journal:  Aust N Z J Ophthalmol       Date:  1989-11
View more
  2 in total

1.  Screening for foot problems in children: is this practice justifiable?

Authors:  Angela Margaret Evans
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 2.  Effectiveness of screening preschool children for amblyopia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christine Schmucker; Robert Grosselfinger; Rob Riemsma; Gerd Antes; Stefan Lange; Wolf Lagrèze; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 2.209

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.