Literature DB >> 17472628

Microbial community structure of ethanol type fermentation in bio-hydrogen production.

Nanqi Ren1, Defeng Xing, Bruce E Rittmann, Lihua Zhao, Tianhui Xie, Xin Zhao.   

Abstract

Three continuous stirred-tank reactors (CSTRs) were used for H(2) production from molasses wastewater at influent pH of 6.0-6.5 (reactor A), 5.5-6.0 (reactor B), or 4.0-4.5 (reactor C). After operation for 28 days, the microbial community formed ethanol type (C), propionate type (A) and ethanol-butyrate-mixed type (B) fermentation. The H(2) production rate was the highest for ethanol type fermentation, 0.40 l (g VSS)(-1) day(-1) or 0.45 l H(2) (g COD removed)(-1). Microbial community dynamics and diversity were analysed using double-gradient denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DG-DGGE). Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles indicated that the community structures changed quickly in the first 14 days. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the dominant bacterial groups were low G+C Gram-positive bacteria, Bacteroides, gamma-Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria; alpha-Proteobacteria, beta-Proteobacteria, delta-Proteobacteria and Spirochaetes were also presented as minor groups in the three reactors. H(2)-producing bacteria were affiliated with Ethanoligenens, Acetanaerobacterium, Clostridium, Megasphaera, Citrobacter and Bacteroides. An ethanol-based H(2)-producing bacterium, Ethanoligenens harbinense CGMCC1152, was isolated from reactor C and visualized using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to be 19% of the eubacteria in reactor C. In addition, isoenzyme activity staining for alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) supported that the majority of ethanol-producing bacteria were affiliated with Ethanoligenens in the microbial community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17472628     DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01234.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 1462-2912            Impact factor:   5.491


  23 in total

1.  Influence of external resistance on electrogenesis, methanogenesis, and anode prokaryotic communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Sokhee Jung; John M Regan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Isolation and characterization of Shigella flexneri G3, capable of effective cellulosic saccharification under mesophilic conditions.

Authors:  Aijie Wang; Lingfang Gao; Nanqi Ren; Jifei Xu; Chong Liu; Guangli Cao; Hao Yu; Wenzong Liu; Christopher L Hemme; Zhili He; Jizhong Zhou
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Study of the succession of microbial communities for sulfur cycle response to ecological factors change in sediment of sewage system.

Authors:  Yanchen Liu; Qian Dong; Chen Wu; Xiaohong Zhou; Hanchang Shi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Molecular-based environmental risk assessment of three varieties of genetically engineered cows.

Authors:  Jianxiang Xu; Jie Zhao; Jianwu Wang; Yaofeng Zhao; Lei Zhang; Mingxing Chu; Ning Li
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2011-01-09       Impact factor: 2.788

5.  Novel Clostridium populations involved in the anaerobic degradation of Microcystis blooms.

Authors:  Peng Xing; Liang Guo; Wei Tian; Qinglong L Wu
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 10.302

6.  Genetic diversity of hydrogen-producing bacteria in an acidophilic ethanol-H2-coproducing system, analyzed using the [Fe]-hydrogenase gene.

Authors:  Defeng Xing; Nanqi Ren; Bruce E Rittmann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Isolation of the exoelectrogenic bacterium Ochrobactrum anthropi YZ-1 by using a U-tube microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Yi Zuo; Defeng Xing; John M Regan; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-21       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Simultaneous cellulose degradation and electricity production by Enterobacter cloacae in a microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Farzaneh Rezaei; Defeng Xing; Rachel Wagner; John M Regan; Tom L Richard; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Diversity change of microbial communities responding to zinc and arsenic pollution in a river of northeastern China.

Authors:  Jun Zhao; Xin Zhao; Lei Chao; Wei Zhang; Tao You; Jie Zhang
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.066

10.  Microbial shifts in the swine distal gut in response to the treatment with antimicrobial growth promoter, tylosin.

Authors:  Hyeun Bum Kim; Klaudyna Borewicz; Bryan A White; Randall S Singer; Srinand Sreevatsan; Zheng Jin Tu; Richard E Isaacson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.