Literature DB >> 17472305

Hip resurfacing: indications, results, and conclusions.

Caroline Hing1, Diane Back, Andrew Shimmin.   

Abstract

Hip resurfacing using metal-on-metal bearings has increased in popularity as a viable treatment option for young, active patients with osteoarthritis. Theoretic advantages of this procedure include preservation of bone stock, reduction in osteolysis, and a reduced risk of dislocation when compared with conventional hip arthroplasty with smaller diameter metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Concerns associated with the use of metal-on-metal bearings during hip resurfacing include the production of metal ions with unknown carcinogenic and immunologic effects. The long-term survival of the modern metal-on-metal hip resurfacing implant is also unknown. Hip resurfacing accounts for 7.5% of all hip replacements in Australia and has a 2.2% revision rate, with femoral fracture being the most common reason for revision. The cumulative survival rate at the authors' institution is 99.14% at 3-year follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17472305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Instr Course Lect        ISSN: 0065-6895


  11 in total

1.  Revision rate of Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: comparison of published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Authors:  Reinhard Schuh; Daniel Neumann; Rauend Rauf; Jochen Hofstaetter; Nikolaus Boehler; Gerold Labek
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years.

Authors:  Eric J Yue; Miguel E Cabanela; Gavan P Duffy; Michael G Heckman; Mary I O'Connor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Metallic debris from metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty regulates periprosthetic tissues.

Authors:  Christoph H Lohmann; Gurpal Singh; Hans-Georg Willert; Gottfried H Buchhorn
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2014-11-18

4.  Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?

Authors:  Gabrielle S Donahue; Viktor Lindgren; Vincent P Galea; Rami Madanat; Orhun Muratoglu; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Conversion of a failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Jacob A Haynes; Jeffrey B Stambough; Robert L Barrack; Denis Nam
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

Review 6.  Is patient selection important for hip resurfacing?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Craig J Della Valle; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Hip arthroplasty with the articular surface replacement (ASR) system: survivorship analysis and functional outcomes.

Authors:  S Shemesh; Y Kosashvili; S Heller; E Sidon; L Yaari; N Cohen; S Velkes
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-07-11

8.  Do ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing differ from those in metal-on-metal THA at long-term followup?

Authors:  Lucia Savarino; Matteo Cadossi; Eugenio Chiarello; Nicola Baldini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Survival and functional outcome of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system in patients aged 65 and older at up to ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Regis Pailhe; Gulraj S Matharu; Akash Sharma; Paul B Pynsent; Ronan B Treacy
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Confronting hip resurfacing and big femoral head replacement gait analysis.

Authors:  Panagiotis K Karampinas; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; John Vlamis; Konstantinos Nikolopoulos; Dimitrios S Korres
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-03-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.