Literature DB >> 17471729

The time required to focus on a cued signal frequency.

Bertram Scharf1, Adam Reeves, John Suciu.   

Abstract

How quickly can a listener focus on a single tonal cue that indicates the frequency of an upcoming signal? Initial measurements were made with frequency uncertainty (signal frequency varies randomly from trial to trial) and with certainty (same frequency on all trials). Measured by a yes-no procedure, thresholds for 40- and 20-ms signals presented in continuous broadband noise at 50 dB SPL were higher in uncertainty than in certainty; the difference decreased monotonically from 5 dB at frequencies below 500 Hz to under 3 dB above about 2500 Hz. This decrease in the detrimental effect from uncertainty, which comes about with increasing signal frequency, may result from preferential attention to higher frequencies. In a second experiment, frequency again varied randomly, but each trial now began with a cue at the signal frequency. The critical variable was the delay from cue onset to signal onset. A delay of 352 ms eliminated the detrimental effect of frequency uncertainty at all frequencies. At the shortest delays of 52 and 82 ms the detrimental effect was reduced primarily at lower frequencies. Our analysis suggests that shifting focus to a cued frequency region, under optimal stimulus conditions, requires less than 52 ms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17471729     DOI: 10.1121/1.2537461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Auditory attentional filter in the absence of masking noise.

Authors:  Elan Selvi Anandan; Ruby Husain; Kumar Seluakumaran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Adam T Tierney; Giada Guerra; Aeron Laffere; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  On the number of auditory filter outputs needed to understand speech: further evidence for auditory channel independence.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Effects of temporal uncertainty and temporal expectancy on infants' auditory sensitivity.

Authors:  Lynne A Werner; Heather K Parrish; Nicole M Holmer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Involuntary monitoring of sound signals in noise is reflected in the human auditory evoked N1m response.

Authors:  Lothar Lagemann; Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Teismann; Christo Pantev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Attention as a Unitary Concept.

Authors:  Adam Reeves
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.