Literature DB >> 17469917

Place and response learning in human virtual navigation: behavioral measures and gender differences.

Neil Schmitzer-Torbert1.   

Abstract

Two experiments examined the use of place and response strategies by humans navigating virtual multiple T mazes. In Experiment 1, probe trials revealed that participants commonly used place and response strategies, and place strategies were more frequent early in training, whereas response strategies were more frequent late in training. Compared with women, men learned the correct path through the maze more quickly and developed a more stable route through the maze. In Experiment 2, participants were trained to locate 2 targets. One target required participants to use either a place or response strategy, whereas the other target could be found using either strategy. Accuracy improved faster for place training compared with response training, and women outperformed men in both groups. Probe trials testing transfer of the imposed strategy to the other target found faster transfer for place training than for response training and that women demonstrated faster transfer than men. Accuracy on probe trials was correlated with poor route stability in the place-trained group and with good route stability in the response-trained group, indicating that navigation strategy use may be related to measures of improvement in performance on normal trials. (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17469917     DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.121.2.277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  8 in total

1.  Functional perturbation of forebrain principal neurons reveals differential effects in novel and well-learned tasks.

Authors:  Emily T Stoneham; Daniel G McHail; Katelyn N Boggs; Sarah H Albani; Jason A Carty; Rebekah C Evans; Kelly A Hamilton; Victoria M Saadat; Samanza Hussain; Maggie E Greer; Theodore C Dumas
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Effects of age on navigation strategy.

Authors:  M Kirk Rodgers; Joseph A Sindone; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 4.673

3.  Human place and response learning: navigation strategy selection, pupil size and gaze behavior.

Authors:  Olivier de Condappa; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-12-24

Review 4.  A meta-analysis of sex differences in human navigation skills.

Authors:  Alina Nazareth; Xing Huang; Daniel Voyer; Nora Newcombe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-10

5.  Navigation strategies in patients with vestibular loss tested in a virtual reality T-maze.

Authors:  Roberto Gammeri; Jacques Léonard; Michel Toupet; Charlotte Hautefort; Christian van Nechel; Stéphane Besnard; Marie-Laure Machado; Estelle Nakul; Marion Montava; Jean-Pierre Lavieille; Christophe Lopez
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 6.682

6.  Low-Resolution Place and Response Learning Capacities in Down Syndrome.

Authors:  Mathilde Bostelmann; Floriana Costanzo; Lorelay Martorana; Deny Menghini; Stefano Vicari; Pamela Banta Lavenex; Pierre Lavenex
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-26

7.  Persistent and stable biases in spatial learning mechanisms predict navigational style.

Authors:  Andrew J Furman; Amy M Clements-Stephens; Steven A Marchette; Amy L Shelton
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.526

8.  Human Vicarious Trial and Error Is Predictive of Spatial Navigation Performance.

Authors:  Diogo Santos-Pata; Paul F M J Verschure
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 3.558

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.