Literature DB >> 24830787

Persistent and stable biases in spatial learning mechanisms predict navigational style.

Andrew J Furman1, Amy M Clements-Stephens, Steven A Marchette, Amy L Shelton.   

Abstract

A wealth of evidence in rodents and humans supports the central roles of two learning systems--hippocampal place learning and striatal response learning--in the formation of spatial representations to support navigation. Individual differences in the ways that these mechanisms are engaged during initial encoding and subsequent navigation may provide a powerful framework for explaining the wide range of variability found in the strategies and solutions that make up human navigational styles. Previous work has revealed that activation in the hippocampal and striatal networks during learning could predict navigational style. Here, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the relative activations in these systems during both initial encoding and the act of dynamic navigation in a learned environment. Participants learned a virtual environment and were tested on subsequent navigation to targets within the environment. We observed that a given individual had a consistent balance of memory system engagement across both initial encoding and subsequent navigation, a balance that successfully predicted the participants' tendencies to use novel shortcuts versus familiar paths during dynamic navigation. This was further supported by the observation that the activation during subsequent retrieval was not dependent on the type of solution used on a given trial. Taken together, our results suggest a model in which the place- and response-learning systems are present in parallel to support a variety of navigational behaviors, but stable biases in the engagement of these systems influence what solutions might be available for any given individual.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24830787     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0279-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  27 in total

1.  A dissociation between object manipulation spatial ability and spatial orientation ability.

Authors:  M Kozhevnikov; M Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-07

2.  Neural correlates of encoding space from route and survey perspectives.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Neural correlates of individual differences in spatial learning strategies.

Authors:  Amy L Shelton; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 4.  Transformations of visuospatial images.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Zacks; Pascale Michelon
Journal:  Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev       Date:  2005-06

5.  Individual skill differences and large-scale environmental learning.

Authors:  Alexa W Fields; Amy L Shelton
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Cognitive mappers to creatures of habit: differential engagement of place and response learning mechanisms predicts human navigational behavior.

Authors:  Steven A Marchette; Arnold Bakker; Amy L Shelton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.

Authors:  S G Vandenberg; A R Kuse
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1978-10

8.  Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning.

Authors:  M G Packard; J L McGaugh
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Lateralized human hippocampal activity predicts navigation based on sequence or place memory.

Authors:  Kinga Iglói; Christian F Doeller; Alain Berthoz; Laure Rondi-Reig; Neil Burgess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A quantitative evaluation of cross-participant registration techniques for MRI studies of the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Michael A Yassa; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  6 in total

1.  Instructions matter: Individual differences in navigation strategy and ability.

Authors:  Alexander P Boone; Bryan Maghen; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

2.  Sex differences in navigation strategy and efficiency.

Authors:  Alexander P Boone; Xinyi Gong; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-08

3.  Functional Imbalance of Anterolateral Entorhinal Cortex and Hippocampal Dentate/CA3 Underlies Age-Related Object Pattern Separation Deficits.

Authors:  Zachariah M Reagh; Jessica A Noche; Nicholas J Tustison; Derek Delisle; Elizabeth A Murray; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Sex differences in spatial navigation and perception in human adolescents and emerging adults.

Authors:  Jennifer T Sneider; Derek A Hamilton; Julia E Cohen-Gilbert; David J Crowley; Isabelle M Rosso; Marisa M Silveri
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  The Effects of Restricted Peripheral Field-of-View on Spatial Learning while Navigating.

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  The Impact of the Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Gene on Trauma and Spatial Processing.

Authors:  Jessica K Miller; Siné McDougall; Sarah Thomas; Jan Wiener
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 4.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.