Literature DB >> 17468940

Practical and philosophical issues surrounding a national item bank: if we build it will they come?

Dennis A Revicki1, Jeff Sloan.   

Abstract

Item response theory (IRT), item banking and computer adaptive testing (CAT) methods have the potential to provide novel platforms for the collection, analysis and dissemination of patient data on health status and well-being. There are considerable challenges associated with building and maintaining a national item bank and it is uncertain whether there is sufficient interest among key stakeholders for IRT-based and CAT measures. The most convincing activity is demonstrating that the approach is feasible, psychometrically sound and useful in different specific applications. Demonstrated success opens up the possibility of more widespread acceptability and application. As part of the development effort, there needs to be continued meetings and discussion with psychometricians, instrument developers, clinical researchers, the FDA, pharmaceutical industry researchers and a managed care organizations about the advantages and disadvantages of a national item bank.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17468940     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-007-9218-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  20 in total

1.  Validation of electronic data capture of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome--Quality of Life Measure, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the EuroQol.

Authors:  Donald M Bushnell; Margaret C Reilly; Carmen Galani; Mona L Martin; Jean-François Ricci; Donald L Patrick; Christopher R McBurney
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.725

2.  Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Ron D Hays; Jakob B Bjorner; Karon F Cook; Paul K Crane; Jeanne A Teresi; David Thissen; Dennis A Revicki; David J Weiss; Ronald K Hambleton; Honghu Liu; Richard Gershon; Steven P Reise; Jin-shei Lai; David Cella
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century.

Authors:  C A McHorney
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Using patient-reported outcomes in clinical oncology practice: benefits, challenges and next steps.

Authors:  Molla Donaldson
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Symone B Detmar; Martin J Muller; Jan H Schornagel; Lidwina D V Wever; Neil K Aaronson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Use of item response theory to link 3 modules of functional status items from the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old study.

Authors:  Colleen A McHorney
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing.

Authors:  D A Revicki; D F Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Patient-reported outcome instrument selection: designing a measurement strategy.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Maria E Watson; Joseph D Jackson; David Cella; Michele Y Halyard
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Electronic pain questionnaires: a randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment.

Authors:  Andrew J Cook; David A Roberts; Michael D Henderson; Lisa C Van Winkle; Dania C Chastain; Robin J Hamill-Ruth
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 10.  Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States.

Authors:  D A Revicki; D Osoba; D Fairclough; I Barofsky; R Berzon; N K Leidy; M Rothman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.440

View more
  3 in total

1.  Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): depression, anxiety, and anger.

Authors:  Paul A Pilkonis; Seung W Choi; Steven P Reise; Angela M Stover; William T Riley; David Cella
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2011-06-21

2.  Advances in applications of item response theory to clinical assessment.

Authors:  Michael L Thomas
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2019-03-14

3.  An Item Bank for Abuse of Prescription Pain Medication from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®).

Authors:  Paul A Pilkonis; Lan Yu; Nathan E Dodds; Kelly L Johnston; Suzanne M Lawrence; Thomas F Hilton; Dennis C Daley; Ashwin A Patkar; Dennis McCarty
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.750

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.