Literature DB >> 11887121

Use of item response theory to link 3 modules of functional status items from the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old study.

Colleen A McHorney1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To link, by using item response theory (IRT), 3 modules of functional status items in the Asset and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old (AHEAD) study.
DESIGN: Secondary data analysis of the functional status items in the AHEAD study. In that study, participants completed a common set of functional status items and were randomly assigned to complete 1 of 2 modules containing different functional status items.
SETTING: A nationally representative panel study of elderly. PARTICIPANTS: US baseline data from 4655 respondents.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nineteen common items and 2 sets of supplemental items that measure functional status.
RESULTS: A 2-parameter model for dichotomous items was used for linking the 3 modules of items. By using this model, both sets of supplemental items were successfully linked to the common items, allowing the placement of all items on the same underlying measure of ability. The small-muscle instrumental activities of daily living were the easiest of all the items for respondents to perform. The item on walking from the Longitudinal Study of Aging was the most difficult for respondents to perform.
CONCLUSIONS: IRT-based linking methods were a useful way to overcome test dependency and to place items on a common metric even if different respondents answer different sets of items. Numerous important design features can degrade linking results and should be attended to in future linking studies. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11887121     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.29610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  13 in total

1.  Linking the activity measure for post acute care and the quality of life outcomes in neurological disorders.

Authors:  Stephen M Haley; Pengsheng Ni; Jin-Shei Lai; Feng Tian; Wendy J Coster; Alan M Jette; Donald Straub; David Cella
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Use of item response theory to develop a shortened version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 emotional functioning scale.

Authors:  J B Bjorner; M Aa Petersen; M Groenvold; N Aaronson; M Ahlner-Elmqvist; J I Arraras; A Brédart; P Fayers; M Jordhoy; M Sprangers; M Watson; T Young
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Practical and philosophical issues surrounding a national item bank: if we build it will they come?

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Linking existing instruments to develop a continuum of care measure: accuracy comparison using function-related group classification.

Authors:  Chih-Ying Li; Sergio Romero; Kit N Simpson; Heather S Bonilha; Annie N Simpson; Ickpyo Hong; Craig A Velozo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Data for cancer comparative effectiveness research: past, present, and future potential.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Meyer; William R Carpenter; Amy P Abernethy; Til Stürmer; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Development of an Expanded Measure of Physical Functioning for Older Persons in Epidemiologic Research.

Authors:  Alden L Gross; Richard N Jones; Sharon K Inouye
Journal:  Res Aging       Date:  2014-09-15

7.  Within-group differences in depression among older Hispanics living in the United States.

Authors:  Frances M Yang; Yamileth Cazorla-Lancaster; Richard N Jones
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  FIM-Minimum Data Set Motor Item Bank: Short Forms Development and Precision Comparison in Veterans.

Authors:  Chih-Ying Li; Sergio Romero; Annie N Simpson; Heather S Bonilha; Kit N Simpson; Ickpyo Hong; Craig A Velozo
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 9.  Calibrating ADL-IADL scales to improve measurement accuracy and to extend the disability construct into the preclinical range: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert A Fieo; Elizabeth J Austin; John M Starr; Ian J Deary
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 3.921

10.  The Academic Medical Center Linear Disability Score (ALDS) item bank: item response theory analysis in a mixed patient population.

Authors:  Rebecca Holman; Nadine Weisscher; Cees A W Glas; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Marinus Vermeulen; Rob J de Haan; Robert Lindeboom
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2005-12-29       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.