Literature DB >> 9330558

Health status assessment for the twenty-first century: item response theory, item banking and computer adaptive testing.

D A Revicki1, D F Cella.   

Abstract

Health status assessment is frequently used to evaluate the combined impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease and its treatment on functioning and well-being from the patient's perspective. No single health status measure can efficiently cover the range of problems in functioning and well-being experienced across HIV disease stages. Item response theory (IRT), item banking and computer adaptive testing (CAT) provide a solution to measuring health-related quality of life (HRQoL) across different stages of HIV disease. IRT allows us to examine the response characteristics of individual items and the relationship between responses to individual items and the responses to each other item in a domain. With information on the response characteristics of a large number of items covering a HRQoL domain (e.g. physical function, and psychological well-being), and information on the interrelationships between all pairs of these items and the total scale, we can construct more efficient scales. Item banks consist of large sets of questions representing various levels of a HRQoL domain that can be used to develop brief, efficient scales for measuring the domain. CAT is the application of IRT and item banks to the tailored assessment of HRQoL domains specific to individual patients. Given the results of IRT analyses and computer-assisted test administration, more efficient and brief scales can be used to measure multiple domains of HRQoL for clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9330558     DOI: 10.1023/a:1018420418455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  7 in total

1.  Quality of life in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection: measurement by the Medical Outcomes Study instrument.

Authors:  T Wachtel; J Piette; V Mor; M Stein; J Fleishman; C Carpenter
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Comments on health indicators: methodological perspectives.

Authors:  T W Bice
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.663

3.  Health status among persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus. A community-based study.

Authors:  D P Lubeck; J F Fries
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Evidence for reliability, validity and usefulness of the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV).

Authors:  A W Wu; D A Revicki; D Jacobson; F E Malitz
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Applications of the Medical Outcomes Study health-related quality of life measures in HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  A W Wu; R D Hays; S Kelly; F Malitz; S A Bozzette
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Access to medical care and health-related quality of life for low-income persons with symptomatic human immunodeficiency virus.

Authors:  W E Cunningham; R D Hays; K W Williams; K C Beck; W J Dixon; M F Shapiro
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Change in clinical status, health status, and health utility outcomes in HIV-infected patients.

Authors:  D A Revicki; A W Wu; M I Murray
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 2.983

  7 in total
  81 in total

1.  Functional disability and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  Stephen P McKenna; Lynda Doward
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 2.631

2.  Practical and philosophical issues surrounding a national item bank: if we build it will they come?

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; Jeff Sloan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-28       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Stimulating innovations in the measurement of parenting constructs.

Authors:  Louise C Mâsse; Allison W Watts
Journal:  Child Obes       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.992

4.  An accurate and efficient identification of children with psychosocial problems by means of computerized adaptive testing.

Authors:  Antonius G C Vogels; Gert W Jacobusse; Symen A Reijneveld
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Procedures to develop a computerized adaptive test to assess patient-reported physical functioning.

Authors:  Erin McCabe; Douglas P Gross; Okan Bulut
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computerized adaptive tests in cervical spine surgery.

Authors:  Barrett S Boody; Surabhi Bhatt; Aditya S Mazmudar; Wellington K Hsu; Nan E Rothrock; Alpesh A Patel
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2018-01-05

7.  Adaptive short forms for outpatient rehabilitation outcome assessment.

Authors:  Alan M Jette; Stephen M Haley; Pengsheng Ni; Richard Moed
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.159

Review 8.  Quality of life questionnaires for children with cancer and childhood cancer survivors: a review of the development of available measures.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Sonya J Strohm; Heleen Maurice-Stam; Martha A Grootenhuis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Development of items designed to evaluate activity performance and participation in children and adolescents with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Christina L Calhoun; Stephen M Haley; Anne Riley; Lawrence C Vogel; Craig M McDonald; M J Mulcahey
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2009-10-25

10.  Using item response theory to analyze the relationship between health-related quality of life and health risk factors.

Authors:  Yongwen Jiang; Jana Earl Hesser
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.