Literature DB >> 27761633

Does a retropulsion prevention device equalize the surgical success of Ho:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripters for upper ureteral stones? A prospective randomized study.

Sahin Bagbanci1, Mumtaz Dadali2, Yeliz Dadalı3, Levent Emir2, Ozkan Gorgulu4, Ayhan Karabulut2.   

Abstract

To establish if a retropulsion prevention device for ureteral stones equalizes surgical success and push-back rates of Ho:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripters for upper ureteral stones. Patients with upper ureteral stones (n = 267) were treated endoscopically at the Department of Urology between April 2014 and December 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to pneumatic and Ho:YAG laser lithotripters as group-1 and group-2, respectively. Lithotripsy was performed with Stone ConeTM in both groups. The surgical success rate on the first postoperative day was 81.5 % (n = 106) and 90.6 % (n = 116) for group-1 and group-2, respectively, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The relation between stone size and surgical success was statistically significant for both groups (p < 0.01). Surgical success for the stones closer than 2 cm to the UPJ was 23.1 % for the pneumatic group versus 64 % for the laser group (p < 0.01). Lithotripsy time was significantly longer in group-2 (16.48 ± 4.74 min) than group-1 (12.24 ± 3.95 min) (p < 0.01). Ho:YAG laser lithotripsy is more successful than pneumatic lithotripsy for upper ureteral stones and a retropulsion prevention device does not equalize the surgical success of Ho:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripters for upper ureteral stones on the first postoperative day and one month after surgery. Although the success rate of the first month after surgery is higher in group-2, the difference is not statistically significant.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Instrumentation; Laser; Ureteral stones; Ureteroscopy; Urolithiasis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27761633     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-016-0930-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urolithiasis        ISSN: 2194-7228            Impact factor:   3.436


  18 in total

1.  A randomized prospective controlled study for assessment of different ureteral occlusion devices in prevention of stone migration during pneumatic lithotripsy.

Authors:  Yasser A Farahat; Abd-Elhamid M Elbahnasy; Osama M Elashry
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

Authors:  Franz Faul; Edgar Erdfelder; Axel Buchner; Albert-Georg Lang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

3.  Differences in ureteroscopic stone treatment and outcomes for distal, mid-, proximal, or multiple ureteral locations: the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society ureteroscopy global study.

Authors:  Enrique Perez Castro; Palle J S Osther; Viorel Jinga; Hassan Razvi; Konstantinos G Stravodimos; Kandarp Parikh; Ali R Kural; Jean J de la Rosette
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Efficacy of the Stone Cone for treatment of proximal ureteral stones.

Authors:  S D Maislos; M Volpe; P S Albert; A Raboy
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Ureteral and bladder lesions after ballistic, ultrasonic, electrohydraulic, or laser lithotripsy.

Authors:  M Piergiovanni; F Desgrandchamps; B Cochand-Priollet; T Janssen; S Colomer; P Teillac; A Le Duc
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Holmium:YAG Lasertripsy with semirigid ureterorenoscope for upper-ureteral stones >2 cm.

Authors:  Chih Shou Chen; Ching F Wu; Jia J Shee; Wei Y Lin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Retrograde ureteroscopic treatment for upper ureteral stones: a 5-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Weimin Yu; Fan Cheng; Xiaobin Zhang; Sixing Yang; Yuan Ruan; Yue Xia; Ting Rao
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  Use of the Stone Cone for prevention of calculus retropulsion during holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy: case series and review of the literature.

Authors:  Brian H Eisner; Stephen P Dretler
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.

Authors:  Kenneth F Schulz; Douglas G Altman; David Moher
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  A comparison of efficacies of holmium YAG laser, and pneumatic lithotripsy in the endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones.

Authors:  Ekrem Akdeniz; Lokman İrkılata; Hüseyin Cihan Demirel; Acun Saylık; Mustafa Suat Bolat; Necmettin Şahinkaya; Mehmet Zengin; Mustafa Kemal Atilla
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Do alpha-1 antagonist medications affect the success of semi-rigid ureteroscopy? A prospective, randomised, single-blind, multicentric study.

Authors:  Mustafa Aydın; Muhammet Fatih Kılınç; Abdulmecit Yavuz; Göksel Bayar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Cost-effectiveness of anti-retropulsive devices varies according to the locations of proximal ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Weisong Wu; Jiaqiao Zhang; Rixiati Yi; Xianmiu Li; Xiao Yu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 2.264

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.