Literature DB >> 17459448

Explaining brightness illusions using spatial filtering and local response normalization.

Alan E Robinson1, Paul S Hammon, Virginia R de Sa.   

Abstract

We introduce two new low-level computational models of brightness perception that account for a wide range of brightness illusions, including many variations on White's Effect [Perception, 8, 1979, 413]. Our models extend Blakeslee and McCourt's ODOG model [Vision Research, 39, 1999, 4361], which combines multiscale oriented difference-of-Gaussian filters and response normalization. We extend the response normalization to be more neurally plausible by constraining normalization to nearby receptive fields (models 1 and 2) and spatial frequencies (model 2), and show that both of these changes increase the effectiveness of the models at predicting brightness illusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17459448     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.02.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  19 in total

1.  Noise masking of White's illusion exposes the weakness of current spatial filtering models of lightness perception.

Authors:  Torsten Betz; Robert Shapley; Felix A Wichmann; Marianne Maertens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Dynamic brightness induction causes flicker adaptation, but only along the edges: evidence against the neural filling-in of brightness.

Authors:  Alan E Robinson; Virginia R de Sa
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Spatiotemporal analysis of brightness induction.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Fixational eye movements enable robust edge detection.

Authors:  Lynn Schmittwilken; Marianne Maertens
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.004

5.  The Oriented Difference of Gaussians (ODOG) model of brightness perception: Overview and executable Mathematica notebooks.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Davis Cope; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-03

6.  Brightness induction magnitude declines with increasing distance from the inducing field edge.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  An exponential filter model predicts lightness illusions.

Authors:  Astrid Zeman; Kevin R Brooks; Sennay Ghebreab
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  A neurodynamical model of brightness induction in v1.

Authors:  Olivier Penacchio; Xavier Otazu; Laura Dempere-Marco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  What visual illusions tell us about underlying neural mechanisms and observer strategies for tackling the inverse problem of achromatic perception.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Scale-invariance in brightness illusions implicates object-level visual processing.

Authors:  Erica Dixon; Arthur Shapiro; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.