Literature DB >> 17458565

Needs of developing the skills of palliative care at the oncology ward: an audit of symptoms among 203 consecutive cancer patients in Finland.

E Salminen1, K E Clemens, K Syrjänen, H Salmenoja.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To clarify the prevalence and severity of the symptoms, 203 consecutive patients with breast, prostate and other cancers treated mainly for palliation were surveyed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The series includes 116 men and 87 women with the mean age of 65 years (range 27-86 years). The patients filled-up the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) questionnaire with 11 items describing cancer-related symptoms in the visual analogue scale (VAS).
RESULTS: Altogether, 98% of the patients reported at least 1 of the 10 symptoms. There was a significant difference in the score frequencies between the 10 symptoms (p = 0.0001), fatigue receiving the highest frequency (50.8%) of the high scores. Fatigue was also the single most frequent symptom reported by 86.3% of the patients, followed by pain at effort (71.5%), sleeplessness (71.1%) and depression (59.0%). The most disturbing syndrome was pain (n = 48, 23.9%), followed by fatigue (n = 28, 13.9%), depression (9.5%) and dyspnoea (6.0%). Altogether, 75% had more than 5 symptoms and 10% reported all 10 symptoms. The total number of symptoms was not significantly associated with sex (p = 0.781) or age (p = 0.062), but it was associated with the diagnostic group; patients with breast cancer (n = 41) and those with prostate cancer (n = 44) reported fewer symptoms than the patients with other cancers (n = 116)(p = 0.023, Kruskal-Wallis).
CONCLUSIONS: Symptoms related to cancer are common among patients treated with palliative indication, but if not specifically surveyed, may remain un-detected and un-treated. ESAS as a clinical tool brings more symptoms to the attention of the physicians and helps in getting a comprehensive insight into the patient's problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17458565     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-007-0252-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  14 in total

1.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) as an audit tool.

Authors:  D J Dudgeon; M Harlos; J J Clinch
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.250

Review 2.  The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications.

Authors:  H Sintonen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Impact of palliative care unit admission on symptom control evaluated by the edmonton symptom assessment system.

Authors:  Caterina Modonesi; Emanuela Scarpi; Marco Maltoni; Stefania Derni; Laura Fabbri; Francesca Martini; Elisabetta Sansoni; Dino Amadori
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.612

4.  The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System as a screening tool for depression and anxiety.

Authors:  Ernesto Vignaroli; Ellen A Pace; Jie Willey; J Lynn Palmer; Tao Zhang; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Monitoring symptoms in patients with advanced illness in long-term care: A pilot study.

Authors:  John R Brechtl; Shaiqua Murshed; Peter Homel; Marilyn Bookbinder
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Backlash in the treatment of cancer pain: use of opioid analgesics in a Finnish general hospital in 1987, 1991, and 1994.

Authors:  E Vuorinen; A Vainio; A Reponen
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  How palliative care of cancer patients is organised between a university hospital and primary care in Finland.

Authors:  Tiina Tasmuth; Tiina Saarto; Eija Kalso
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Errors in symptom intensity self-assessment by patients receiving outpatient palliative care.

Authors:  Anil Garyali; J Lynn Palmer; Sriram Yennurajalingam; Tao Zhang; Ellen A Pace; Eduardo Bruera
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 9.  The measurement of pain from metastatic bone disease: capturing the patient's experience.

Authors:  Charles S Cleeland
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Ascribed meaning: a critical factor in coping and pain attenuation in patients with cancer-related pain.

Authors:  D P Barkwell
Journal:  J Palliat Care       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.250

View more
  10 in total

1.  Automated monitoring of symptoms during ambulatory chemotherapy and oncology providers' use of the information: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Kathi H Mooney; Susan L Beck; Robert H Friedman; Ramesh Farzanfar; Bob Wong
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  [Symptom control and place of death in palliative cancer patients in primary care. Results of the controlled PAMINO evaluation study].

Authors:  P Engeser; K Hermann; J Szecsenyi; F Peters-Klimm
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Symptom improvement as prognostic factor for survival in cancer patients undergoing palliative care: a pilot study.

Authors:  Filomena Narducci; Roberta Grande; Lucia Mentuccia; Tiziana Trapasso; Isabella Sperduti; Emanuela Magnolfi; Anna Maria Fariello; Donatello Gemma; Teresa Gamucci
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Exercise and Cancer Treatment Symptoms in 408 Newly Diagnosed Older Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lisa K Sprod; Supriya G Mohile; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Michelle C Janelsins; Luke J Peppone; Gary R Morrow; Raymond Lord; Howard Gross; Karen M Mustian
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 3.599

5.  Pattern of palliative care, pain management and referral trends in patients receiving radiotherapy at a tertiary cancer center.

Authors:  Kuldeep Sharma; Bidhu K Mohanti; Gaura K Rath; Sushma Bhatnagar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2009-07

6.  Do high symptom scores trigger clinical actions? An audit after implementing electronic symptom screening.

Authors:  Hsien Seow; Jonathan Sussman; Lorraine Martelli-Reid; Greg Pond; Daryl Bainbridge
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Unmet supportive needs of cancer patients in an acute care hospital in Japan--a census study.

Authors:  Daisuke Fujisawa; Sunre Park; Rieko Kimura; Ikuko Suyama; Yurie Koyama; Mari Takeuchi; Hiroka Yoshikawa; Saori Hashiguchi; Joichiro Shirahase; Motoichiro Kato; Junzo Takeda; Haruo Kashima
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  A review of the reliability and validity of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System.

Authors:  L A Richardson; G W Jones
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  Validation of the Dutch version of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System.

Authors:  Frederieke H van der Baan; Josephine J Koldenhof; Ellen J de Nijs; Michael A Echteld; Danielle Zweers; Ginette M Hesselmann; Sigrid C Vervoort; Jan B Vos; Everlien de Graaf; Petronella O Witteveen; Karijn P Suijkerbuijk; Alexander de Graeff; Saskia C Teunissen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Screening for symptoms of anxiety and depression in patients treated with renal replacement therapy: utility of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised.

Authors:  Evan Tang; Sumaya Dano; Nathaniel Edwards; Sara Macanovic; Heather Ford; Susan Bartlett; Doris Howell; Madeline Li; Marta Novak; Istvan Mucsi
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 4.147

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.