Literature DB >> 17457056

A Fhit-ing role in the DNA damage checkpoint response.

Hideshi Ishii1, Ya Wang, Kay Huebner.   

Abstract

The FHIT gene encompasses the most active common fragile site of the human genome and is thus exquisitely sensitive to intragenic alterations by DNA damaging agents, alterations that can lead to FHIT allele loss very early in the preneoplastic phase of cancer development, before or coincident with activation of the DNA damage checkpoint. Fhit protein expression is lost or reduced in many preneoplastic lesions and in >50% of cancers, Fhit knockout mice are highly susceptible to carcinogen induction of tumors and Fhit replacement in these mice by gene therapy induces apoptosis and significantly reduces tumor burden. But learning how Fhit induces apoptosis and suppresses tumors has been a challenge because interacting proteins, effectors of Fhit signals, have not been discovered. Nevertheless, the study of Fhit deficient mouse and human tissue-derived and cancer-derived cells in vitro has led to several important conclusions: repair protein-deficient cancers are more likely to be Fhit-deficient; Fhit-deficient cells show enhanced resistance to UVC, mitomycin C, camptothecin and ionizing radiation-induced cell killing, possibly due to strong activation of the ATR pathway following DNA damage; Fhit-deficient cells show higher efficiency of homologous recombination repair, a double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells; Fhit protein indirectly affects S-phase checkpoint and DNA repair. Finally, results of a recent study have suggested that the DNA damage-susceptible FRA3B/FHIT chromosome fragile region, paradoxically, encodes a protein, Fhit, that is necessary for protecting cells from accumulation of DNA damage, through modulation of checkpoint proteins Hus1 and phosphoChk1. Thus, inactivation of Fhit contributes to accumulation of abnormal checkpoint phenotypes in cancer development. It will be very important to determine mechanisms employed by Fhit in modulating checkpoint pathways, and to define consequences of Fhit loss in specific preneoplastic and neoplastic tissues, to provide rationales for effective replacement or reactivation of endogenous Fhit pathways in novel therapeutic or preventive approaches.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17457056     DOI: 10.4161/cc.6.9.4213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  13 in total

Review 1.  Hits, Fhits and Nits: beyond enzymatic function.

Authors:  Kay Huebner; Joshua C Saldivar; Jin Sun; Hidetaka Shibata; Teresa Druck
Journal:  Adv Enzyme Regul       Date:  2010-10-28

2.  The effects of Fhit on tumorigenesis after multi-exposure to low-dose radiation.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Yu; Lin Lu; Siyuan Wen; Ya Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2009-11-22

Review 3.  Molecular mechanisms of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Amit M Deshpande; David T Wong
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.512

4.  High-resolution whole-genome analysis of skull base chordomas implicates FHIT loss in chordoma pathogenesis.

Authors:  Roberto Jose Diaz; Mustafa Guduk; Rocco Romagnuolo; Christian A Smith; Paul Northcott; David Shih; Fitim Berisha; Adrienne Flanagan; David G Munoz; Michael D Cusimano; M Necmettin Pamir; James T Rutka
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  Aberrant expression of DNA damage response proteins is associated with breast cancer subtype and clinical features.

Authors:  Gulnur Guler; Cigdem Himmetoglu; Rafael E Jimenez; Susan M Geyer; Wenle P Wang; Stefan Costinean; Robert T Pilarski; Carl Morrison; Dinc Suren; Jianhua Liu; Jingchun Chen; Jyoti Kamal; Charles L Shapiro; Kay Huebner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Genome wide DNA-profiling of HIV-related B-cell lymphomas.

Authors:  Daniela Capello; Marta Scandurra; Giulia Poretti; Paola M V Rancoita; Michael Mian; Annunziata Gloghini; Clara Deambrogi; Maurizio Martini; Davide Rossi; Timothy C Greiner; Wing C Chan; Maurilio Ponzoni; Santiago M Moreno; Miguel A Piris; Vincenzo Canzonieri; Michele Spina; Umberto Tirelli; Giorgio Inghirami; Andrea Rinaldi; Emanuele Zucca; Riccardo D Favera; Franco Cavalli; Luigi Maria Larocca; Ivo Kwee; Antonino Carbone; Gianluca Gaidano; Francesco Bertoni
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 7.  Fhit tumor suppressor: guardian of the preneoplastic genome.

Authors:  Flavia Pichiorri; Tiziana Palumbo; Sung-Suk Suh; Hiroshi Okamura; Francesco Trapasso; Hideshi Ishii; Kay Huebner; Carlo M Croce
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.404

8.  Fragile histidine triad protein, WW domain-containing oxidoreductase protein Wwox, and activator protein 2gamma expression levels correlate with basal phenotype in breast cancer.

Authors:  Gulnur Guler; Kay Huebner; Cigdem Himmetoglu; Rafael E Jimenez; Stefan Costinean; Stefano Volinia; Robert T Pilarski; Mutlu Hayran; Charles L Shapiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Mechanisms of tumor growth and metastasis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jarrett E Walsh; Deanne M R Lathers; Angela C Chi; M Boyd Gillespie; Terry A Day; M Rita I Young
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2007-06

10.  Clinical values of Ku80 upregulation in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Shuai Wang; Junjie Xi; Zongwu Lin; Jiatao Hao; Can Yao; Cheng Zhan; Wei Jiang; Yu Shi; Qun Wang
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.452

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.