BACKGROUND: The expression of fragile histidine triad protein (Fhit) and WW domain-containing oxidoreductase protein (Wwox), tumor suppressors that are encoded by fragile (FRA) loci FRA3B and FRA16D, are lost concordantly in breast cancers. In the current study, the authors examined correlations among Fhit, Wwox, the activator protein 2 transcription factors AP2alpha and AP2gamma, cytokeratins 5 and 6 (CK5/6), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) and their associations with breast cancer phenotypes. METHODS: Tissue microarrays constructed from 837 breast cancer blocks were immunostained. Expression in >10% of tumor cells was considered positive for cytoplasmic CK5/6, membranous EGFR, and nuclear AP2alpha and AP2gamma. Cytoplasmic Fhit and Wwox staining was scored according to staining intensity. ER, PR, and HER-2 status of tumors was derived from records. Correlations among immunohistochemical markers and tumor subtypes were assessed by univariate and multivariate statistical methods. RESULTS: Triple-negative tumors had more frequent expression of EGFR, CK5/6 (P < .001), and AP2gamma (P = .003) and more frequent loss of Fhit and Wwox (P < .001), and an inverse correlation was observed between Fhit, Wwox expression and EGFR, ER, and PR expression (P < .001). Reduced Fhit expression was more common in HER-2-positive and AP2gamma-positive cases (P < .001 and P = .002, respectively). There was a direct correlation noted between Fhit and Wwox (P < .001) and a borderline positive relation between AP2alpha and AP2gamma (P = .054). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this investigation suggested that reduced expression levels of Fhit, Wwox, and nuclear AP2gamma have roles in the pathogenesis of basal-like differentiation in breast cancer. Alteration in the expression of fragile site genes occurs in most of these cancers and may contribute to defects in DNA repair, as observed in breast cancer 1 (BRCA1)-deficient cancers. Thus, DNA damage response checkpoint proteins may be targets for treatment. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
BACKGROUND: The expression of fragile histidine triad protein (Fhit) and WW domain-containing oxidoreductase protein (Wwox), tumor suppressors that are encoded by fragile (FRA) loci FRA3B and FRA16D, are lost concordantly in breast cancers. In the current study, the authors examined correlations among Fhit, Wwox, the activator protein 2 transcription factors AP2alpha and AP2gamma, cytokeratins 5 and 6 (CK5/6), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and humanepidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) and their associations with breast cancer phenotypes. METHODS: Tissue microarrays constructed from 837 breast cancer blocks were immunostained. Expression in >10% of tumor cells was considered positive for cytoplasmic CK5/6, membranous EGFR, and nuclear AP2alpha and AP2gamma. Cytoplasmic Fhit and Wwox staining was scored according to staining intensity. ER, PR, and HER-2 status of tumors was derived from records. Correlations among immunohistochemical markers and tumor subtypes were assessed by univariate and multivariate statistical methods. RESULTS: Triple-negative tumors had more frequent expression of EGFR, CK5/6 (P < .001), and AP2gamma (P = .003) and more frequent loss of Fhit and Wwox (P < .001), and an inverse correlation was observed between Fhit, Wwox expression and EGFR, ER, and PR expression (P < .001). Reduced Fhit expression was more common in HER-2-positive and AP2gamma-positive cases (P < .001 and P = .002, respectively). There was a direct correlation noted between Fhit and Wwox (P < .001) and a borderline positive relation between AP2alpha and AP2gamma (P = .054). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this investigation suggested that reduced expression levels of Fhit, Wwox, and nuclear AP2gamma have roles in the pathogenesis of basal-like differentiation in breast cancer. Alteration in the expression of fragile site genes occurs in most of these cancers and may contribute to defects in DNA repair, as observed in breast cancer 1 (BRCA1)-deficient cancers. Thus, DNA damage response checkpoint proteins may be targets for treatment. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.
Authors: María I Nunez; John Ludes-Meyers; Martín C Abba; Hyunsuk Kil; Nancy W Abbey; Robert E Page; Aysegul Sahin; Andrés J P Klein-Szanto; C Marcelo Aldaz Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Rami I Aqeilan; Valentina Donati; Alexey Palamarchuk; Francesco Trapasso; Mohamed Kaou; Yuri Pekarsky; Marius Sudol; Carlo M Croce Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-08-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Torsten O Nielsen; Forrest D Hsu; Kristin Jensen; Maggie Cheang; Gamze Karaca; Zhiyuan Hu; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Chad Livasy; Dave Cowan; Lynn Dressler; Lars A Akslen; Joseph Ragaz; Allen M Gown; C Blake Gilks; Matt van de Rijn; Charles M Perou Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-08-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Helen E Bryant; Niklas Schultz; Huw D Thomas; Kayan M Parker; Dan Flower; Elena Lopez; Suzanne Kyle; Mark Meuth; Nicola J Curtin; Thomas Helleday Journal: Nature Date: 2005-04-14 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: Hannah Farmer; Nuala McCabe; Christopher J Lord; Andrew N J Tutt; Damian A Johnson; Tobias B Richardson; Manuela Santarosa; Krystyna J Dillon; Ian Hickson; Charlotte Knights; Niall M B Martin; Stephen P Jackson; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth Journal: Nature Date: 2005-04-14 Impact factor: 69.504
Authors: George W Woodfield; Yizhen Chen; Thomas B Bair; Frederick E Domann; Ronald J Weigel Journal: Genes Chromosomes Cancer Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 5.006
Authors: Edith A Perez; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; E Aubrey Thompson; Cathy A Andorfer Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2010-01-22 Impact factor: 4.872