Literature DB >> 22278850

Is unicompartmental arthroplasty an acceptable option for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee?

Danilo Bruni1, Francesco Iacono, Giovanni Raspugli, Stefano Zaffagnini, Maurilio Marcacci.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The literature suggests survivorship of unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) for spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee ranges from 93% to 97% at 10 to 12 years. However, these data arise from small series (23 to 33 patients), jeopardizing meaningful conclusions. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined (1) the longer-term survivorship of UKAs in a larger group of patients with spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee; (2) their subjective, symptomatic, and functional outcomes; and (3) the percentage of failures and reasons for failures to identify relevant indications, contraindications, and technical parameters for treatment with a modern implant design.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated all 84 patients with late-stage spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee who had a medial UKA from 1998 to 2005. All patients had preoperative MRI to confirm the diagnosis, exclude metaphyseal involvement, and confirm the absence of major degenerative changes in the lateral and patellofemoral compartments. The mean age of the patients at surgery was 66 years and mean BMI was 28.9. We conducted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis using revision for any reason as the end point. Minimum followup was 63 months (mean, 98 months; range, 63-145 months).
RESULTS: Ten-year survivorship was 89%. Ten revisions were performed; the most common reasons were subsidence of the tibial component (four) and aseptic loosening of the tibial component (three). No patient underwent revision for progression of osteoarthritis in the lateral or patellofemoral compartments.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee may be an indication for UKA, provided secondary osteonecrosis of the knee is ruled out, preoperative MRI documents the absence of disease in other compartments, and there is no overcorrection in any plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22278850      PMCID: PMC3314777          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2246-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  37 in total

1.  Spontaneous Osteonecrosis of the Knee.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last: three keys to success.

Authors:  Leo A Whiteside
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Francesco Iacono; Alessandro Russo; Stefano Zaffagnini; Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli; Simone Bignozzi; Laura Bragonzoni; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Osteonecrosis of the knee.

Authors:  P A Lotke; M L Ecker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation.

Authors:  S Ahlbäck
Journal:  Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh)       Date:  1968

6.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Treatment of osteonecrosis of the knee.

Authors:  P A Lotke; R Battish; C L Nelson
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  2001

Review 8.  Osteonecrosis of the knee: current clinical concepts.

Authors:  D V Patel; N M Breazeale; C T Behr; R F Warren; T L Wickiewicz; S J O'Brien
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  The treatment of osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle.

Authors:  P A Lotke; J A Abend; M L Ecker
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: technique through a mini-incision.

Authors:  Jean-Noel A Argenson; Sebastien Parratte; Xavier Flecher; Jean-Manuel Aubaniac
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  14 in total

1.  Effect of age on cost-effectiveness of unicompartimental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty in the US.

Authors:  Francesco Iacono; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-12

2.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis: an effective tool to predict implant survival after an all-poly unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-a 10 year follow-up study.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Laura Bragonzoni; Michele Gagliardi; Marco Bontempi; Ibrahim Akkawi; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Francesco Iacono; Silvio Patella; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The coronal alignment after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty can be predicted: usefulness of full-length valgus stress radiography for evaluating correctability.

Authors:  Yasutaka Tashiro; Shuichi Matsuda; Ken Okazaki; Hideki Mizu-Uchi; Umito Kuwashima; Yukihide Iwamoto
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Good survivorship of all-polyethylene tibial component UKA at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Michele Gagliardi; Ibrahim Akkawi; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Simone Bignozzi; Tedi Marko; Laura Bragonzoni; Alberto Grassi; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Treatment options for secondary osteonecrosis of the knee.

Authors:  Hassan Zmerly; Manuela Moscato; Ibrahim Akkawi; Riccardo Galletti; Valentina Di Gregori
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-04-25

6.  Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Ibrahim Akkawi; Francesco Iacono; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Michele Gagliardi; Marco Nitri; Alberto Grassi; Stefano Zaffagnini; Simone Bignozzi; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  FACTORS AFFECTING THE FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF OXFORD PHASE 3 UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY.

Authors:  Ayşe Esin Polat; Bariş Polat; Tahsin Gürpinar; Bariş Peker; Tolga Tüzüner
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2020 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

8.  Valgus Correctability and Meniscal Extrusion Were Associated With Alignment After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyota Ishibashi; Eiji Sasaki; Hironori Otsuka; Koyama Kazushige; Yuji Yamamoto; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.755

9.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee: a retrospective analysis of preoperative and postoperative results.

Authors:  Akira Horikawa; Naohisa Miyakoshi; Yoichi Shimada; Hiroyuki Kodama
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Post-arthroscopic osteonecrosis of the medial tibial plateau: a case series.

Authors:  Axel Marx; Alexander Beier; Pouria Taheri; Martin Röpke; Thomas Kalinski; Andreas M Halder
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2016-10-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.