OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether day-3 embryo morphology predicts euploidy. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Private IVF center. PATIENT(S): Subjects (n = 144) undergoing in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). INTERVENTION(S): Translate day-3 embryo characteristics into a standardized score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Day-3 embryo morphology score and PGD fluorescence in situ hybridization results for chromosomes: 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, X, and Y. RESULT(S): Of 1,043 biopsied blastomeres, 67% (n = 696) were chromosomally abnormal. Women with advanced maternal age (AMA) were 1.3 times more likely to have chromosomal errors (95% CI 1.1-1.4) than younger subjects (<38 years old). Morphology predicted PGD results in the AMA group (n = 553), but not in younger women. Fragmentation predicted euploidy in both the younger and the AMA group, but cell number did not. CONCLUSION(S): Day-3 embryo morphology selects for euploidy among AMA subjects but not among younger women who may have other factors responsible for embryo dysmorphism. However, cellular fragmentation is a sensitive proxy for selecting chromosomally normal embryos in both age groups. It is unclear that PGD-aneuploidy screening is a better tool for selecting which embryos to transfer than the standard approach of using day-3 embryo features, particularly among older women, a group for whom this technology is targeted.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether day-3 embryo morphology predicts euploidy. DESIGN: Retrospective. SETTING: Private IVF center. PATIENT(S): Subjects (n = 144) undergoing in vitro fertilization and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD). INTERVENTION(S): Translate day-3 embryo characteristics into a standardized score. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Day-3 embryo morphology score and PGD fluorescence in situ hybridization results for chromosomes: 13, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22, X, and Y. RESULT(S): Of 1,043 biopsied blastomeres, 67% (n = 696) were chromosomally abnormal. Women with advanced maternal age (AMA) were 1.3 times more likely to have chromosomal errors (95% CI 1.1-1.4) than younger subjects (<38 years old). Morphology predicted PGD results in the AMA group (n = 553), but not in younger women. Fragmentation predicted euploidy in both the younger and the AMA group, but cell number did not. CONCLUSION(S): Day-3 embryo morphology selects for euploidy among AMA subjects but not among younger women who may have other factors responsible for embryo dysmorphism. However, cellular fragmentation is a sensitive proxy for selecting chromosomally normal embryos in both age groups. It is unclear that PGD-aneuploidy screening is a better tool for selecting which embryos to transfer than the standard approach of using day-3 embryo features, particularly among older women, a group for whom this technology is targeted.
Authors: Sandra Zamora; Ana Clavero; M Carmen Gonzalvo; Juan de Dios Luna Del Castillo; Jose Antonio Roldán-Nofuentes; Juan Mozas; Jose Antonio Castilla Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Zhihong Yang; Jiaen Liu; Gary S Collins; Shala A Salem; Xiaohong Liu; Sarah S Lyle; Alison C Peck; E Scott Sills; Rifaat D Salem Journal: Mol Cytogenet Date: 2012-05-02 Impact factor: 2.009
Authors: Javier García-Ferreyra; Daniel Luna; Lucy Villegas; Rocío Romero; Patricia Zavala; Roly Hilario; Julio Dueñas-Chacón Journal: Clin Med Insights Reprod Health Date: 2015-11-11