Literature DB >> 17450510

Neurophysiological evidence of methylmercury neurotoxicity.

Katsuyuki Murata1, Philippe Grandjean, Miwako Dakeishi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A variety of neurophysiological measures are useful in hospital settings for diagnostic and other clinical purposes. Previously, abnormal changes in various sensory evoked potentials (EPs), and heart rate variability (HRV) were observed in patients with acquired and fetal Minamata disease (MD; methylmercury poisoning). In recent years, some of these methods have been used for the risk assessment of low-level methylmercury exposure in asymptomatic children. The objectives of this article were to present an overview of neurophysiological findings involved in methylmercury neurotoxicity and to examine the usefulness of those measures.
METHODS: The reports addressing both neurophysiological measures and methylmercury exposure in humans were identified and evaluated.
RESULTS: The neurological signs and symptoms of MD included paresthesias, constriction of visual fields, impairment of hearing and speech, mental disturbances, excessive sweating, and hypersalivation. Neuropathological lesions involved visual, auditory, and post- and pre-central cortex areas. Neurophysiological changes involved in methylmercury, as assessed by EPs and HRV, were found to be in accordance with both clinical and neuropathological observations in patients with MD.
CONCLUSIONS: EPs and HRV appear to be useful and objective methods for assessing methylmercury neurotoxicity. However, subtle changes due to low-level methylmercury exposure may not necessarily be of clinical relevance, and interpretation of small deviations from expectations must be cautious. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17450510     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.20471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  8 in total

1.  Visual evoked potentials in children prenatally exposed to methylmercury.

Authors:  Takashi Yorifuji; Katsuyuki Murata; Kristian S Bjerve; Anna L Choi; Pal Weihe; Philippe Grandjean
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.294

2.  Prenatal exposure to methylmercury and PCBs affects distinct stages of information processing: an event-related potential study with Inuit children.

Authors:  Olivier Boucher; Célyne H Bastien; Dave Saint-Amour; Eric Dewailly; Pierre Ayotte; Joseph L Jacobson; Sandra W Jacobson; Gina Muckle
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Large prospective birth cohort studies on environmental contaminants and child health - goals, challenges, limitations and needs.

Authors:  Zhong-Cheng Luo; Jian-Meng Liu; William D Fraser
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 1.538

4.  Selenomethionine reduces visual deficits due to developmental methylmercury exposures.

Authors:  Daniel N Weber; Victoria P Connaughton; John A Dellinger; David Klemer; Ava Udvadia; Michael J Carvan
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-09-05

Review 5.  Glia and methylmercury neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Mingwei Ni; Xin Li; João B T Rocha; Marcelo Farina; Michael Aschner
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2012

6.  Total Blood Mercury Predicts Methylmercury Exposure in Fish and Shellfish Consumers.

Authors:  Ellen M Wells; Leonid Kopylev; Rebecca Nachman; Elizabeth G Radke; Johanna Congleton; Deborah Segal
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.081

7.  Reducing Periconceptional Methylmercury Exposure: Cost-Utility Analysis for a Proposed Screening Program for Women Planning a Pregnancy in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Janet Gaskin; Colin Rennie; Doug Coyle
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Economic evaluation of health consequences of prenatal methylmercury exposure in France.

Authors:  Céline Pichery; Martine Bellanger; Denis Zmirou-Navier; Nadine Fréry; Sylvaine Cordier; Anne Roue-Legall; Philippe Hartemann; Philippe Grandjean
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 5.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.