| Literature DB >> 26024213 |
Janet Gaskin1, Colin Rennie, Doug Coyle.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The assessment of neurodevelopmental effects in children associated with prenatal methylmercury exposure, from contaminated fish and seafood in the maternal diet, has recently been strengthened by adjustment for the negative confounding resulting from co-exposure to beneficial polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26024213 PMCID: PMC4671232 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1409034
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
Figure 1Combined decision tree/Markov model. Dist., distribution.
Data elements of the economic model.
| Data element | Base analysis | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Blood Hg distribution | StatCan 2013 | |
| Women 20–39 years of age | ||
| Geometric mean | 0.66 μg/L (95% CI: 0.47, 0.92) | |
| 75th percentile | 1.6 μg/L (95% CI: 1.1, 2.1) | |
| Women 40–59 years of age | ||
| Geometric mean | 0.82 μg/L (95% CI: 0.65, 1.0) | |
| 75th percentile | 1.7 μg/L (95% CI: 1.1 2.2) | |
| 90th percentile | 2.9 μg/L (95% CI: 1.9, 3.9) | |
| Ratio cord to maternal blood Hg | 1.7 | Stern and Smith 2003 |
| Weighted average of standard deviation of mercury effect on neurobehavioral test from true prenatal exposure doubling | 9.36% | Budtz-Jørgensen et al. 2007 |
| Intervention | Kim et al. 2006 | |
| Probability of successful intervention | 0.857 | |
| Effectiveness of successful intervention | 0.556 | |
| Effectiveness of unsuccessful intervention | 0 | |
| Live birth rate by maternal age (years) | StatCan 2011 | |
| 20–24 | 0.122 | |
| 25–29 | 0.280 | |
| 30–34 | 0.345 | |
| 35–39 | 0.181 | |
| 40–44 | 0.039 | |
| 45–49 | 0.003 | |
| Infertility rate by maternal age (years) | Bushnik et al. 2012 | |
| 18–24 | 0.070 | |
| 25–29 | 0.085 | |
| 30–34 | 0.108 | |
| 35–39 | 0.130 | |
| 40–44 | 0.143 | |
| Screening costs | ||
| Laboratory blood Hg test | Can$23.27 | MOHLTC 2012 |
| Family doctor, intermediate appointment | Can$33.70 | MOHLTC 2013 |
| Remedial education SEPPA costs | OME 2012 | |
| JK–grade 4 | Can$931.29 | |
| Grades 5–8 | Can$715.34 | |
| Grades 9–12 | Can$472.92 | |
| QALY disutility for MMR (EQ5D) | –0.38 | Oostenbrink et al. 2002 |
| Discount rate | 5% | CADTH 2006 |
| Abbreviations: EQ5D, EuroQuol-5D, European quality of life–5 dimensions; MMR, mild mental retardation (IQ between 50 and 70); QALY, quality-adjusted life year; SEPPA, special education per pupil amount. Disutility is defined as the loss in utility. | ||
Estimated costs and QALYs associated with maternal blood Hg screening and interventions versus reference case.
| Analysis for discount rate of 5% | Reference case | Screening and intervention at Hg(Bcord) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.4 μg/L | 4.7 μg/L | 8 μg/L | ||
| Costs (Can$) | $2.33 | $33.79 | $33.82 | $34.48 |
| QALYs | 18.8676 | 18.8694 | 18.8693 | 18.8686 |
| Incremental costs versus reference case | $31.46 | $31.49 | $32.14 | |
| Incremental QALY versus reference case | 0.001743 | 0.001707 | 0.000945 | |
| Incremental cost per QALY gained versus reference case | $18,051 | $18,451 | $34,017 | |
| Abbreviations: Hg(Bcord), cord blood mercury concentration; QALY, quality-adjusted life year. The model threshold for adverse effects used in the analysis was 3.4 μg/L for all intervention thresholds investigated (3.4, 4.7, and 8 μg/L). | ||||
Sensitivity analysis.
| Analysis | Estimated incremental cost per QALY (Can$) |
|---|---|
| Univariate sensitivity analysis scenario | |
| Base case | $18,051 |
| Discount rate of 3% | $11,859 |
| Discount rate of 0% | $4,453 |
| Variable discount rate | $10,119 |
| HUI3 disutility for MMR of –0.56 | $12,249 |
| HUI3 disutility for MMR of –0.76 | $9,026 |
| Precision of 68% in fish intake assessment for mercury effect on neurobehavioural tests | $15,660 |
| Initial family doctor appointment needed for each Hg(B) screening | $35,900 |
| Probabilistic sensitivity analysis | |
| Average incremental cost per QALY (ICUR) | $18,209 |
| ICUR, 5th percentile | $9,339 |
| ICUR, 95th percentile | $56,555 |
| Incremental net benefit gained versus reference case, for Can$20,000/QALY | $3.10 |
| INB, 5th percentile | –$20.01 |
| INB, 95th percentile | $36.53 |
| Incremental net benefit gained versus reference case, for Can$50,000/QALY | $54.96 |
| INB, 5th percentile | –$3.56 |
| INB, 95th percentile | $139.08 |
| Abbreviations: Hg(B), blood mercury concentration; HUI3, Health Utilities Index Mark 3; ICUR, incremental cost-utility index (i.e., incremental cost per QALY); INB, incremental net benefit; MMR, mild mental retardation (IQ between 50 and 70); QALY, quality-adjusted life year. The HUI3 disutility for MMR represents the loss in utility associated with having mild mental retardation assessed using the HUI3 questionnaire. | |
Figure 2Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) was derived by plotting the incremental net benefit (INB) for 5,000 Monte Carlo simulations for each of a range of willingness to pay per QALY (Can$). The analysis was based on the model assumptions of the base case analysis (Table 1).
Figure 3Expected value of perfect information (EVPI) by willingness to pay. The EVPI is derived by calculating, for each value of willingness to pay for a QALY, the mean of the 5,000 Monte Carlo simulations of the difference between the maximum incremental net benefit (INB) of the treatment comparators and the INB of the treatment comparator with the best overall ICUR. The analysis was based on the model assumptions of the base case analysis (Table 1).
Value of information analysis for screening intervention versus reference case.
| Value of information | WTP per QALY (Can$) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| $20,000 | $30,000 | $50,000 | |
| EVPI (Can$) | 5.30 | 2.20 | 0.61 |
| EVPPI (Can$) | |||
| Mean Hg(B) of women 20–39 years | 1.41 | 0.02960 | 5.77E-06 |
| Standard deviation Hg(B) of women 20–39 years | 2.08 | 0.393 | 0.0463 |
| Mean Hg(B) of women 40–49 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Standard deviation Hg(B) of women 40–49 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ratio of cord/maternal Hg(B) | 2.39 | 0.0606 | 0 |
| Percent of a standard deviation in cognitive deficits | 0.444 | 1.17E-05 | 0 |
| Probability of a successful intervention | 1.08 | 0.102 | 0.00509 |
| Effectiveness of a successful intervention | 1.24 | 0.0590 | 6.12E-04 |
| Disutility for MMR | 0.0404 | 0 | 0 |
| Abbreviations: EVPI, expected value of perfect information; EVPPI, expected value of partial perfect information; Hg(B), blood mercury concentration; MMR, mild mental retardation (IQ between 50 and 70); QALY, quality-adjusted life year; WTP, willingness to pay. Percent of a standard deviation in cognitive deficits is used in the model used to quantify the loss in IQ points associated with a doubling of true prenatal mercury exposure. Disutility is defined as the loss in utility. | |||