Literature DB >> 17450188

Condition-specific competition in container mosquitoes: the role of noncompeting life-history stages.

Katie S Costanzo1, Banugopan Kesavaraju, Steven A Juliano.   

Abstract

Condition-specific competition, wherein competitive superiority varies with the abiotic environment, can determine species' distributions in a spatially heterogeneous environment. We investigated this phenomenon with two competing container-dwelling mosquitoes. We tested the hypothesis that habitat drying alters the outcome of interspecific competition, predicting that the competitive impact of Aedes albopictus on Aedes aegypti would be severe in wetter environments, but greatly reduced in drier environments. We tested these predictions in a laboratory experiment within cages, with aquatic larvae residing in water-filled cups within the cage, and adults emerging within the cage and ovipositing on the cups. We raised each species alone or with the competitor. Environmental treatments were fluctuating (water in cups evaporated to 50% of the original volume and then cups were refilled), and drying (water in cups evaporated completely and cups remained dry for two weeks before refilling). There was a significant interaction between treatment and species combination for adult populations of both species. Interspecific competition was highly asymmetrical. In the wetter fluctuating environment, interspecific competition had a large negative effect on A. aegypti, but in the drying environment, interspecific competition had a large negative effect on A. albopictus, and relatively little impact on A. aegypti. The main cause of the shift in competitive advantage appeared to be a greater increase in egg mortality for A. albopictus under dry conditions, compared to A. aegypti. Thus, mortality impinging on noncompeting life cycle stages can alter the population level impact of interspecific competition. The hypothesis that dry conditions shift competitive advantage away from A. albopictus is supported in this experiment.

Entities:  

Year:  2005        PMID: 17450188      PMCID: PMC1853366          DOI: 10.1890/05-0583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecology        ISSN: 0012-9658            Impact factor:   5.499


  14 in total

1.  Desiccation and thermal tolerance of eggs and the coexistence of competing mosquitoes.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano; George F O'Meara; Jeneen R Morrill; Michele M Cutwa
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The roles of harsh and fluctuating conditions in the dynamics of ecological communities.

Authors:  P Chesson; N Huntly
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Comparative fine structure of the eggs of Aedes albopictus, Ae. aegypti, and Ae. bahamensis (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  J R Linley
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  Temperature effects on the dynamics of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in the laboratory.

Authors:  B W Alto; S A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.278

5.  Recycling suitability of wash waters from mosquito abatement vehicles and equipment into spray diluent.

Authors:  C H Schaefer; E F Dupras
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 0.917

6.  Precipitation and temperature effects on populations of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae): implications for range expansion.

Authors:  B W Alto; S A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.278

7.  Aedes albopictus distribution, abundance, and colonization in Lee County, Florida, and its effect on Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  J A Hornby; D E Moore; T W Miller
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 0.917

8.  Replacement of Aedes aegypti by Aedes albopictus in Mobile, Alabama.

Authors:  J H Hobbs; E A Hughes; B H Eichold
Journal:  J Am Mosq Control Assoc       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 0.917

9.  Spread of Aedes albopictus and decline of Ae. aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in Florida.

Authors:  G F O'Meara; L F Evans; A D Gettman; J P Cuda
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 2.278

10.  A field test for competitive effects of Aedes albopictus on A. aegypti in South Florida: differences between sites of coexistence and exclusion?

Authors:  Steven A Juliano; L Philip Lounibos; George F O'Meara
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  30 in total

1.  Direct and indirect effects of animal detritus on growth, survival, and mass of invasive container mosquito Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Donald A Yee; Banugopan Kesavaraju; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  The ecological and epidemiological consequences of reproductive interference between the vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.

Authors:  Robert S Paton; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Interpopulation differences in competitive effect and response of the mosquito Aedes aegypti and resistance to invasion by a superior competitor.

Authors:  Paul T Leisnham; S A Juliano
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Influence of resource levels, organic compounds and laboratory colonization on interspecific competition between the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus (Stegomyia albopicta) and the southern house mosquito Culex quinquefasciatus.

Authors:  D W Allgood; D A Yee
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 2.739

5.  Distributions of Competing Container Mosquitoes Depend on Detritus Types, Nutrient Ratios, and Food Availability.

Authors:  Ebony G Murrell; Kavitha Damal; L P Lounibos; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Ann Entomol Soc Am       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Seasonal variation in competition and coexistence of Aedes mosquitoes: stabilizing effects of egg mortality or equalizing effects of resources?

Authors:  Paul A O'Neal; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  COEXISTENCE, EXCLUSION, OR NEUTRALITY? A META-ANALYSIS OF COMPETITION BETWEEN AEDES ALBOPICTUS AND RESIDENT MOSQUITOES.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano
Journal:  Isr J Ecol Evol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 0.559

8.  Interpopulation divergence in competitive interactions of the mosquito Aedes albopictus.

Authors:  P T Leisnham; L P Lounibos; G F O'Meara; S A Juliano
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.499

9.  Your worst enemy could be your best friend: predator contributions to invasion resistance and persistence of natives.

Authors:  Steven A Juliano; L Philip Lounibos; Naoya Nishimura; Krystle Greene
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Detritus type alters the outcome of interspecific competition between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Ebony G Murrell; Steven A Juliano
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.278

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.