PURPOSE: The voluntary breath-hold (BH) technique is a simple method to control the respiration-related motion of a tumor during irradiation. However, the abdominal and chest wall position may not be accurately reproduced using the BH technique. The purpose of this study was to examine whether visual feedback can reduce the fluctuation in wall motion during BH using a new respiratory monitoring device. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed a laser-based BH monitoring and visual feedback system. For this study, five healthy volunteers were enrolled. The volunteers, practicing abdominal breathing, performed shallow end-expiration BH (SEBH), shallow end-inspiration BH (SIBH), and deep end-inspiration BH (DIBH) with or without visual feedback. The abdominal and chest wall positions were measured at 80-ms intervals during BHs. RESULTS: The fluctuation in the chest wall position was smaller than that of the abdominal wall position. The reproducibility of the wall position was improved by visual feedback. With a monitoring device, visual feedback reduced the mean deviation of the abdominal wall from 2.1 +/- 1.3 mm to 1.5 +/- 0.5 mm, 2.5 +/- 1.9 mm to 1.1 +/- 0.4 mm, and 6.6 +/- 2.4 mm to 2.6 +/- 1.4 mm in SEBH, SIBH, and DIBH, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Volunteers can perform the BH maneuver in a highly reproducible fashion when informed about the position of the wall, although in the case of DIBH, the deviation in the wall position remained substantial.
PURPOSE: The voluntary breath-hold (BH) technique is a simple method to control the respiration-related motion of a tumor during irradiation. However, the abdominal and chest wall position may not be accurately reproduced using the BH technique. The purpose of this study was to examine whether visual feedback can reduce the fluctuation in wall motion during BH using a new respiratory monitoring device. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We developed a laser-based BH monitoring and visual feedback system. For this study, five healthy volunteers were enrolled. The volunteers, practicing abdominal breathing, performed shallow end-expiration BH (SEBH), shallow end-inspiration BH (SIBH), and deep end-inspiration BH (DIBH) with or without visual feedback. The abdominal and chest wall positions were measured at 80-ms intervals during BHs. RESULTS: The fluctuation in the chest wall position was smaller than that of the abdominal wall position. The reproducibility of the wall position was improved by visual feedback. With a monitoring device, visual feedback reduced the mean deviation of the abdominal wall from 2.1 +/- 1.3 mm to 1.5 +/- 0.5 mm, 2.5 +/- 1.9 mm to 1.1 +/- 0.4 mm, and 6.6 +/- 2.4 mm to 2.6 +/- 1.4 mm in SEBH, SIBH, and DIBH, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Volunteers can perform the BH maneuver in a highly reproducible fashion when informed about the position of the wall, although in the case of DIBH, the deviation in the wall position remained substantial.
Authors: Vincent Vakaet; Hans Van Hulle; Max Schoepen; Els Van Caelenberg; Annick Van Greveling; Jeroen Holvoet; Chris Monten; Luc De Baerdemaeker; Wilfried De Neve; Marc Coppens; Liv Veldeman Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2021-02-23
Authors: Rob H Ireland; Neil Woodhouse; Nigel Hoggard; James A Swinscoe; Bernadette H Foran; Matthew Q Hatton; Jim M Wild Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2008-10-09 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Danny Lee; Peter B Greer; Carminia Lapuz; Joanna Ludbrook; Perry Hunter; Jameen Arm; Sean Pollock; Kuldeep Makhija; Ricky T O'Brien; Taeho Kim; Paul Keall Journal: Adv Radiat Oncol Date: 2017-03-10