Literature DB >> 17447807

Preferential solvation in urea solutions at different concentrations: properties from simulation studies.

Hironori Kokubo1, B Montgomery Pettitt.   

Abstract

We performed molecular dynamics simulations of urea solutions at different concentrations with two urea models (OPLS and KBFF) to examine the structures responsible for the thermodynamic solution properties. Our simulation results showed that hydrogen-bonding properties such as the average number of hydrogen bonds and their lifetime distributions were nearly constant at all concentrations between infinite dilution and the solubility limit. This implies that the characterization of urea-water solutions in the molarity concentration scale as nearly ideal is a result of facile local hydrogen bonding rather than a global property. Thus, urea concentration does not influence the local propensity for hydrogen bonds, only how they are satisfied. By comparison, the KBFF model of urea donated fewer hydrogen bonds than OPLS. We found that the KBFF urea model in TIP3P water better reproduced the experimental density and diffusion constant data. Preferential solvation analysis showed that there were weak urea-urea and water-water associations in OPLS solution at short distances, but there were no strong associations. We divided urea molecules into large, medium, and small clusters to examine fluctuation properties and found that any particular urea molecule did not stay in the same cluster for a long time. We found neither persistent nor large clusters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17447807      PMCID: PMC2583237          DOI: 10.1021/jp067659x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  8 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics study on hydrophobic effects in aqueous urea solutions.

Authors:  M Ikeguchi; S Nakamura; K Shimizu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-01-31       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 2.  Uncovering the basis for nonideal behavior of biological molecules.

Authors:  Jörg Rösgen; Bernard Montgomery Pettitt; David Wayne Bolen
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Protein folding, stability, and solvation structure in osmolyte solutions.

Authors:  Jörg Rösgen; B Montgomery Pettitt; David Wayne Bolen
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  The thermodynamic stability of proteins.

Authors:  J A Schellman
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1987

5.  Hydrogen bonding and the cryoprotective properties of glycerol/water mixtures.

Authors:  Jennifer L Dashnau; Nathaniel V Nucci; Kim A Sharp; Jane M Vanderkooi
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2006-07-13       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 6.  The control of protein stability and association by weak interactions with water: how do solvents affect these processes?

Authors:  S N Timasheff
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct       Date:  1993

7.  The molecular basis for the chemical denaturation of proteins by urea.

Authors:  Brian J Bennion; Valerie Daggett
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Protein in sugar films and in glycerol/water as examined by infrared spectroscopy and by the fluorescence and phosphorescence of tryptophan.

Authors:  Wayne W Wright; Gregory T Guffanti; Jane M Vanderkooi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.033

  8 in total
  19 in total

1.  Dependency of ligand free energy landscapes on charge parameters and solvent models.

Authors:  Yuko Okamoto; Toshimasa Tanaka; Hironori Kokubo
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-22       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Quantitative assessments of the distinct contributions of polypeptide backbone amides versus side chain groups to chain expansion via chemical denaturation.

Authors:  Alex S Holehouse; Kanchan Garai; Nicholas Lyle; Andreas Vitalis; Rohit V Pappu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Molecular basis of the apparent near ideality of urea solutions.

Authors:  Hironori Kokubo; Jörg Rösgen; D Wayne Bolen; B Montgomery Pettitt
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Kirkwood-Buff analysis of aqueous N-methylacetamide and acetamide solutions modeled by the CHARMM additive and Drude polarizable force fields.

Authors:  Bin Lin; Pedro E M Lopes; Benoît Roux; Alexander D MacKerell
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  The effect of urea on the morphology of NaCl crystals: A combined theoretical and simulation study.

Authors:  Paul E Smith
Journal:  Fluid Phase Equilib       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 2.775

6.  Peptide conformational preferences in osmolyte solutions: transfer free energies of decaalanine.

Authors:  Hironori Kokubo; Char Y Hu; B Montgomery Pettitt
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Urea denaturation by stronger dispersion interactions with proteins than water implies a 2-stage unfolding.

Authors:  Lan Hua; Ruhong Zhou; D Thirumalai; B J Berne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

Review 9.  Reaching new levels of realism in modeling biological macromolecules in cellular environments.

Authors:  Michael Feig; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  J Mol Graph Model       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.518

10.  Osmolyte solutions and protein folding.

Authors:  Char Y Hu; B Montgomery Pettitt; Joerg Roesgen
Journal:  F1000 Biol Rep       Date:  2009-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.