Literature DB >> 17447056

Analgesic use and pain in the hospital settings.

A Vallano1, J Malouf, P Payrulet, J E Baños.   

Abstract

AIM: The aim of this study was to assess the analgesic treatment and the prevalence of pain in patients treated with analgesics in hospitals.
METHODS: Adult patients treated with analgesics were selected from a sample of 1,675 patients in a cross-sectional study carried out in 15 Catalonian hospitals (Spain). Patient characteristics, type of analgesics, treatment schedules, patients' pain intensity and clinical ward and hospital characteristics were assessed. Adherence to analgesic use guidelines was established according to the principles and recommendations of internationally recognised guidelines for pain management. Pain was determined by asking patients about pain intensity by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS).
RESULTS: Analgesics were prescribed for 1,173 patients (70%; 95% CI: 67.4-72.6), in whom 57% (95% CI: 54.2-59.8) had pain and in whom 30.5% (95% CI: 27.9-33.1) pain intensity was greater than 30 mm. Adherence to analgesic treatment guidelines was judged appropriate in only 26.9% (95% CI: 24.4-29.4%) of all patients. The administered analgesic dose was in the recommended dose range in 42% (95% CI: 54-58) of all analgesics and in 28% (95% CI: 24-32) of opioid analgesics. A minority of patients was treated with a rescue schedule or patient-controlled analgesia (2%; 95% CI: 1.4-2.6). Pain prevalence was higher in those with analgesic treatment that did not adhere to guidelines (63.6%; 95% CI: 60.4-66.8) than in those considered as having appropriate adherence to guidelines (39.3%; 95% CI: 33.8-44.6) (p < 0.001). Adherence to analgesic treatment guidelines was higher in the large hospitals (21%; 95% CI: 18-24) than in medium and small hospitals (13%; 95% CI: 9-16) (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although analgesic use is high in the hospital settings, adherence to the principles and recommendations of pain guidelines is low, and pain is usually common in patients treated with analgesics. These results once again emphasise the need to improve analgesic use and pain management in hospitals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17447056     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-007-0303-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  30 in total

1.  Acute pain services revisited--good from far, far from good?

Authors:  Narinder Rawal
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.288

2.  The effect of education, assessment and a standardised prescription on postoperative pain management. The value of clinical audit in the establishment of acute pain services.

Authors:  M Harmer; K A Davies
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 6.955

3.  Audit of opioid prescribing: the effect of hospital guidelines.

Authors:  C A Humphries; D J Counsell; R C Pediani; S L Close
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Pain and pain treatments in European palliative care units. A cross sectional survey from the European Association for Palliative Care Research Network.

Authors:  Pål Klepstad; Stein Kaasa; Nathan Cherny; Geoffrey Hanks; Franco de Conno
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  [Prevalence and management of pain in a hospital: a cross-sectional study].

Authors:  P Durieux; J Bruxelle; A Savignoni; J Coste
Journal:  Presse Med       Date:  2001-03-31       Impact factor: 1.228

6.  Pain prevalence in hospitalized patients in a German university teaching hospital.

Authors:  Barbara Strohbuecker; Herbert Mayer; George C M Evers; Rainer Sabatowski
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.612

7.  Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer.

Authors:  C S Cleeland; R Gonin; A K Hatfield; J H Edmonson; R H Blum; J A Stewart; K J Pandya
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Policy for controlling pain after surgery: effect of sequential changes in management.

Authors:  T H Gould; D L Crosby; M Harmer; S M Lloyd; J N Lunn; G A Rees; D E Roberts; J A Webster
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-11-14

9.  Adequacy of cancer pain management in a Japanese Cancer Hospital.

Authors:  Toru Okuyama; Xin Shelley Wang; Tatsuo Akechi; Tito R Mendoza; Takashi Hosaka; Charles S Cleeland; Yosuke Uchitomi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  [The Prevalence of pain in hospitalized patients].

Authors:  M Cañellas; F Bosch; A Bassols; M Rué; J E Baños
Journal:  Med Clin (Barc)       Date:  1993-06-05       Impact factor: 1.725

View more
  3 in total

1.  The TRPA1 channel mediates the analgesic action of dipyrone and pyrazolone derivatives.

Authors:  Romina Nassini; Camilla Fusi; Serena Materazzi; Elisabetta Coppi; Tiziano Tuccinardi; Ilaria M Marone; Francesco De Logu; Delia Preti; Raquel Tonello; Alberto Chiarugi; Riccardo Patacchini; Pierangelo Geppetti; Silvia Benemei
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  Roger B Fillingim; Christopher D King; Margarete C Ribeiro-Dasilva; Bridgett Rahim-Williams; Joseph L Riley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.820

3.  Trends and characteristics of pethidine use in Taiwan: a six-year-long survey.

Authors:  Hsueh-Hsing Pan; Chung-Yi Li; Tso-Chou Lin; Ju-O Wang; Shung-Tai Ho; Kwua-Yun Wang
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.365

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.