P Durieux1, J Bruxelle, A Savignoni, J Coste. 1. Département de Santé publique, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20, rue Leblanc, F75908 Paris. pierre.durieux@cch.ap-hop-paris.fr
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Improved management of pain, particularly in inpatients, is a public health priority. We conducted this study to ascertain current practices and identify indications useful for measuring their impact. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A "given day" cross-sectional study was conducted in 18 units (11 medicine units and 7 surgery and obstetrics units) at the Cochin Hospital, Paris. All patients hospitalized over 24 hours were included in the study. A short one-page questionnaire was administered by an investigator (nurse or physician) after the patient agreed to participate in the study. All pertinent information concerning pain at admission and/or during the 24 hours of hospitalization (quantified on a simple verbal scale), percent pain relief compared with the initial level, and any circumstances leading to an increase in the pain level during hospitalization were recorded. Data were also collected on antalgesia prescription administered the day of the survey. Social and demographic data as well as discharge diagnosis(es) were also recorded. RESULTS: Nearly 60% of the patients stated they had experienced pain at the time of admission or during the 24-h preceding the survey. In medicine units, 29% of the inpatients with pain were not given any anti-pain treatment (this percentage was 12% in surgery) and 35% stated their pain had been relieved by less than 50% (13% of the patients in surgery). Hospitalization in a medicine unit was associated with fewer and less effective prescriptions in patients experiencing pain. CONCLUSION: Regular and simple indications, specifically the number of patients complaining of pain who have not been given an antalgesic, would provide the health care team with a measurement of pain management useful for assessing its impact and improving patient care.
OBJECTIVES: Improved management of pain, particularly in inpatients, is a public health priority. We conducted this study to ascertain current practices and identify indications useful for measuring their impact. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A "given day" cross-sectional study was conducted in 18 units (11 medicine units and 7 surgery and obstetrics units) at the Cochin Hospital, Paris. All patients hospitalized over 24 hours were included in the study. A short one-page questionnaire was administered by an investigator (nurse or physician) after the patient agreed to participate in the study. All pertinent information concerning pain at admission and/or during the 24 hours of hospitalization (quantified on a simple verbal scale), percent pain relief compared with the initial level, and any circumstances leading to an increase in the pain level during hospitalization were recorded. Data were also collected on antalgesia prescription administered the day of the survey. Social and demographic data as well as discharge diagnosis(es) were also recorded. RESULTS: Nearly 60% of the patients stated they had experienced pain at the time of admission or during the 24-h preceding the survey. In medicine units, 29% of the inpatients with pain were not given any anti-pain treatment (this percentage was 12% in surgery) and 35% stated their pain had been relieved by less than 50% (13% of the patients in surgery). Hospitalization in a medicine unit was associated with fewer and less effective prescriptions in patients experiencing pain. CONCLUSION: Regular and simple indications, specifically the number of patients complaining of pain who have not been given an antalgesic, would provide the health care team with a measurement of pain management useful for assessing its impact and improving patient care.