Literature DB >> 17446992

The role of echo-laparoscopy in abdominal surgery: five years' experience in a dedicated center.

Domenico Piccolboni1, Francesco Ciccone, Anna Settembre, Francesco Corcione.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For more than 20 years intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) has been considered an important diagnostic tool in abdominal surgery. In the last few years, with the spread of laparoscopic surgery, echo-laparoscopy (LIOUS) has gradually replaced open ultrasonography, aiming to achieve similar results.
METHODS: LIOUS was performed using an ALOKA 5.500 device, provided with a linear flexible laparoscopic probe that was compatible with a 10-mm port. IOUS was performed by means of a linear side-view, T-shaped or microconvex probe. The probes were sterilized with hydrogen peroxide. No water bath was used during the surgical examination, but full contact of the probe with the surface of the involved organ was always attempted. From 2001 to 2005, 36 liver resections, 40 pancreas procedures, 203 procedures for suspected common bile duct calculi, 541 colon and 82 stomach resections, and 82 adrenal surgery procedures were performed. IOUS or LIOUS was performed in 432 patients (43.8%). All livers and pancreases underwent intraoperative ultrasound, while biliary, colonic, gastric, and adrenal pathologies were selectively studied when there were doubts about the location and extension of the disease.
RESULTS: IOUS and LIOUS were valuable diagnostic procedures, supplying relevant clinical information in 65.1% of the patients and modifying the surgical approach in 17.2%. LIOUS was used instead of cholangiography to study bile ducts when lythiasis was suspected, achieving high diagnostic specificity (98%) and accuracy (100%). Surgical anatomy of the bile ducts was correctly identified by LIOUS in every case. DISCUSSION: In our experience IOUS and LIOUS were of the utmost importance in better defining staging of disease, infiltration of neighboring structures, number and size of nodular lesions, and anatomy of the hepatic pedicle and intrahepatic structures, thus making it possible to more accurately plan surgical procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17446992     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9382-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Role of laparoscopic ultrasonography in the management of patients with oesophagogastric cancer.

Authors:  A Smith; M D Finch; T G John; O J Garden; S P Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Potential value of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography during partial hepatectomy for metastases: an essential investigation before resection?

Authors:  Edward Leen; Piercarlo Ceccotti; Susan J Moug; Paul Glen; John MacQuarrie; Wilson J Angerson; Thomas Albrecht; Joachim Hohmann; Anja Oldenburg; Jorg Peter Ritz; Paul G Horgan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [The value of intraoperative ultrasonography during surgery for pancreatitis related changes of the pancreas].

Authors:  B Kaczmarek
Journal:  Ann Acad Med Stetin       Date:  2000

4.  Comparison of operative ultrasonography and radiography in screening of the common bile duct for calculi.

Authors:  J J Jakimowicz; H Rutten; P J Jürgens; E J Carol
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Laparoscopic ultrasound vs triphasic computed tomography for detecting liver tumors.

Authors:  A Foroutani; A M Garland; E Berber; A String; K Engle; T L Ryan; J M Pearl; A E Siperstein
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-08

6.  A prospective single-blinded controlled study comparing laparoscopic ultrasound of the common bile duct with operative cholangiography.

Authors:  S E Tranter; M H Thompson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Surgical strategy in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Massimo Falconi; Rossella Bettini; Letizia Boninsegna; Stefano Crippa; Giovanni Butturini; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  JOP       Date:  2006-01-11

8.  Carcinoma of the pancreatic head and periampullary region. Tumor staging with laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  T G John; J D Greig; D C Carter; O J Garden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Intraoperative ultrasonography in screening for liver metastases from colorectal cancer: comparative accuracy with traditional procedures.

Authors:  J Machi; H Isomoto; Y Yamashita; T Kurohiji; K Shirouzu; T Kakegawa
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Is laparoscopic sonography a reliable and sensitive procedure for staging colorectal cancer? A comparative study.

Authors:  O Goletti; G Celona; C Galatioto; B Viaggi; P V Lippolis; L Pieri; E Cavina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparoscopic ultrasound: a surgical "must" for second line intra-operative evaluation of pancreatic cancer resectability.

Authors:  P Piccolboni; A Settembre; P Angelini; F Esposito; S Palladino; F Corcione
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb

2.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: experience of 22 cases.

Authors:  Francesco Corcione; Felice Pirozzi; Diego Cuccurullo; Domenico Piccolboni; Valerio Caracino; Francesco Galante; Daniele Cusano; Antonio Sciuto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A transcriptomic study of Williams-Beuren syndrome associated genes in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Rossella De Cegli; Simona Iacobacci; Anthony Fedele; Andrea Ballabio; Diego di Bernardo
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 6.444

4.  Small-Incision Laparoscopy-Assisted Surgery Under Abdominal Cavity Irrigation in a Porcine Model.

Authors:  Tatsuo Igarashi; Takuro Ishii; Tomohiko Aoe; Wen-Wei Yu; Yuma Ebihara; Hiroshi Kawahira; Shiro Isono; Yukio Naya
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 1.878

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.