Literature DB >> 17446976

The ability of the Self-Rating of the Effects of Alcohol (SRE) Scale to predict alcohol-related outcomes five years later.

Marc A Schuckit1, Tom L Smith, George P Danko, Juliann Pierson, Victor Hesselbrock, Kathleen K Bucholz, John Kramer, Samuel Kuperman, Cameron Dietiker, Rachael Brandon, Grace Chan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A low level of response (LR) to alcohol as measured through alcohol challenges is an early-appearing, genetically influenced characteristic that predicts the risk of heavier drinking and alcohol problems. A less expensive and more easily used measure of LR, the retrospective Self-Rating of the Effects of Alcohol (SRE) questionnaire, also relates to alcohol intake and problems but has not been evaluated for its ability to predict alcohol-related problems 5 years later.
METHOD: At Time 1, 95 18- to 35-year-old (mean age: 25.9 years) subjects who were offspring from families participating at the San Diego site of the Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) were administered the SRE and evaluated regarding alcohol, drug, and demographic characteristics using the Semi-Structured Assessment for the Genetics of Alcoholism (SSAGA) interview. Follow-up interviews (Time 2) using the SSAGA were completed an average (SD) of 5.4 (1.34) years later for approximately 80% of the original sample.
RESULTS: The retrospective SRE score at Time 1 (the number of drinks for effects the first five times [First 5] of drinking) correlated with Time 2 maximum quantity and frequency, alcohol problems overall, the number of alcohol-dependence items endorsed, and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, diagnosis of alcohol abuse or dependence. The relationships remained robust in hierarchical logistic regression analyses even in the context of age, gender, the number of SRE items endorsed, and alcohol use and problem variables at Time 1. The regressions explained between 21% and 43% of the variance of the outcomes overall, with the First 5 SRE score alone accounting for between 4% and 14%.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings are consistent with the ability of SRE-based LR scores at Time 1 to predict alcohol-related outcomes over the subsequent 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17446976     DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2007.68.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs        ISSN: 1937-1888            Impact factor:   2.582


  52 in total

1.  fMRI differences between subjects with low and high responses to alcohol during a stop signal task.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; Susan Tapert; Scott C Matthews; Martin P Paulus; Neil J Tolentino; Tom L Smith; Ryan S Trim; Shana Hall; Alan Simmons
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Performance of the Self-Report of the Effects of Alcohol Questionnaire Across Sexes and Generations.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith; Brinda K Rana; Lee Ann Mendoza; Dennis Clarke; Mari Kawamura
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Chromosome 15q25.1 genetic markers associated with level of response to alcohol in humans.

Authors:  Geoff Joslyn; Gerry Brush; Margaret Robertson; Tom L Smith; Jelger Kalmijn; Marc Schuckit; Raymond L White
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Relationships of Impulsivity and Subjective Response to Alcohol Use and Related Problems.

Authors:  Benjamin L Berey; Robert F Leeman; Brian Pittman; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.582

Review 5.  A Critical Review of Methods and Results in the Search for Genetic Contributors to Alcohol Sensitivity.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.455

6.  Subjective stimulant and sedative effects of alcohol during early drinking experiences predict alcohol involvement in treated adolescents.

Authors:  Tammy Chung; Christopher S Martin
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.582

7.  A Prospective Comparison of How the Level of Response to Alcohol and Impulsivity Relate to Future DSM-IV Alcohol Problems in the COGA Youth Panel.

Authors:  Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith; George Danko; Robert Anthenelli; Lara Schoen; Mari Kawamura; John Kramer; Danielle M Dick; Zoe Neale; Samuel Kuperman; Vivia McCutcheon; Andrey P Anokhin; Victor Hesselbrock; Michie Hesselbrock; Kathleen Bucholz
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 3.455

8.  The Relationship Between Regional Cerebral Blood Flow Estimates and Alcohol Problems at 5-Year Follow-Up: The Role of Level of Response.

Authors:  Kelly E Courtney; Maria Alejandra Infante; Gregory G Brown; Susan F Tapert; Alan N Simmons; Tom L Smith; Marc A Schuckit
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Further Analyses of Genetic Association Between GRM8 and Alcohol Dependence Symptoms Among Young Adults.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Long; Fazil Aliev; Jen-Chyong Wang; Howard J Edenberg; John Nurnberger; Victor Hesselbrock; Bernice Porjesz; Danielle M Dick
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Low sensitivity to alcohol: relations with hangover occurrence and susceptibility in an ecological momentary assessment investigation.

Authors:  Thomas M Piasecki; Kyle J Alley; Wendy S Slutske; Phillip K Wood; Kenneth J Sher; Saul Shiffman; Andrew C Heath
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.