BACKGROUND: Acute alcohol consumption is associated with temporarily increased regional cerebral blood flow (CBF). The extent of this increase appears to be moderated by individual differences in the level of response (LR) to alcohol's subjective effects. The low LR phenotype is a known risk factor for the development of alcohol problems. This study investigates how the low LR phenotype relates to the relationship between alcohol-related changes in CBF and alcohol problems 5 years later. METHODS: Young adults (ages 18 to 25) were selected based on their LR to alcohol and underwent a neuroimaging protocol including arterial spin labeling and functional scans. These participants were recontacted ~5 years later and assessed on alcohol outcomes. A final sample of 107 subjects (54 low and 53 high LR subjects) was included in the analyses. Whole-brain analysis revealed 5 clusters of significant alcohol-induced, versus placebo-induced, CBF changes that were consistent with a previous report. Peak alcohol-placebo CBF response was extracted from these regions and, along with the LR group, submitted to a hierarchical linear regression predicting alcohol problems. Analyses controlled for age, sex, and baseline alcohol problems. RESULTS: In the regression analysis, greater alcohol-placebo CBF difference in the right middle/superior/inferior frontal gyri and bilateral anterior cingulate gyri clusters predicted greater future alcohol problems for the low LR group, whereas this relationship was not found to be significant in the high LR group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a clinically important relationship between CBF and future alcohol problems, particularly in individuals with a low LR phenotype. These initial results help to elucidate the neurobiological pathways involved in the development of alcohol use disorders for individuals with low LR.
BACKGROUND: Acute alcohol consumption is associated with temporarily increased regional cerebral blood flow (CBF). The extent of this increase appears to be moderated by individual differences in the level of response (LR) to alcohol's subjective effects. The low LR phenotype is a known risk factor for the development of alcohol problems. This study investigates how the low LR phenotype relates to the relationship between alcohol-related changes in CBF and alcohol problems 5 years later. METHODS: Young adults (ages 18 to 25) were selected based on their LR to alcohol and underwent a neuroimaging protocol including arterial spin labeling and functional scans. These participants were recontacted ~5 years later and assessed on alcohol outcomes. A final sample of 107 subjects (54 low and 53 high LR subjects) was included in the analyses. Whole-brain analysis revealed 5 clusters of significant alcohol-induced, versus placebo-induced, CBF changes that were consistent with a previous report. Peak alcohol-placebo CBF response was extracted from these regions and, along with the LR group, submitted to a hierarchical linear regression predicting alcohol problems. Analyses controlled for age, sex, and baseline alcohol problems. RESULTS: In the regression analysis, greater alcohol-placebo CBF difference in the right middle/superior/inferior frontal gyri and bilateral anterior cingulate gyri clusters predicted greater future alcohol problems for the low LR group, whereas this relationship was not found to be significant in the high LR group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a clinically important relationship between CBF and future alcohol problems, particularly in individuals with a low LR phenotype. These initial results help to elucidate the neurobiological pathways involved in the development of alcohol use disorders for individuals with low LR.
Authors: Jeffrey J Sacks; Katherine R Gonzales; Ellen E Bouchery; Laura E Tomedi; Robert D Brewer Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-10-01 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Martin P Paulus; Marc A Schuckit; Susan F Tapert; Neil J Tolentino; Scott C Matthews; Tom L Smith; Ryan S Trim; Shana A Hall; Alan N Simmons Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-05-16 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Neil J Tolentino; Christina E Wierenga; Shana Hall; Susan F Tapert; Martin P Paulus; Thomas T Liu; Tom L Smith; Marc A Schuckit Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Donna E Murray; Timothy C Durazzo; Anderson Mon; Thomas P Schmidt; Dieter J Meyerhoff Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Marc A Schuckit; Tom L Smith; George P Danko; Juliann Pierson; Victor Hesselbrock; Kathleen K Bucholz; John Kramer; Samuel Kuperman; Cameron Dietiker; Rachael Brandon; Grace Chan Journal: J Stud Alcohol Drugs Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 2.582
Authors: Najmeh Khalili-Mahani; Matthias J P van Osch; Evelinda Baerends; Roelof P Soeter; Marieke de Kam; Remco W M Zoethout; Albert Dahan; Mark A van Buchem; Joop M A van Gerven; Serge A R B Rombouts Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2011-01-19 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Kelly E Courtney; Maria Alejandra Infante; Maria Bordyug; Alan N Simmons; Susan F Tapert Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Edith V Sullivan; Qingyu Zhao; Kilian M Pohl; Natalie M Zahr; Adolf Pfefferbaum Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2021-02-02 Impact factor: 4.791