BACKGROUND: Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] is one of the most important food and forage legumes in the semi-arid tropics because of its ability to tolerate drought and grow on poor soils. It is cultivated mostly by poor farmers in developing countries, with 80% of production taking place in the dry savannah of tropical West and Central Africa. Cowpea is largely an underexploited crop with relatively little genomic information available for use in applied plant breeding. The goal of the Cowpea Genomics Initiative (CGI), funded by the Kirkhouse Trust, a UK-based charitable organization, is to leverage modern molecular genetic tools for gene discovery and cowpea improvement. One aspect of the initiative is the sequencing of the gene-rich region of the cowpea genome (termed the genespace) recovered using methylation filtration technology and providing annotation and analysis of the sequence data. DESCRIPTION: CGKB, Cowpea Genespace/Genomics Knowledge Base, is an annotation knowledge base developed under the CGI. The database is based on information derived from 298,848 cowpea genespace sequences (GSS) isolated by methylation filtering of genomic DNA. The CGKB consists of three knowledge bases: GSS annotation and comparative genomics knowledge base, GSS enzyme and metabolic pathway knowledge base, and GSS simple sequence repeats (SSRs) knowledge base for molecular marker discovery. A homology-based approach was applied for annotations of the GSS, mainly using BLASTX against four public FASTA formatted protein databases (NCBI GenBank Proteins, UniProtKB-Swiss-Prot, UniprotKB-PIR (Protein Information Resource), and UniProtKB-TrEMBL). Comparative genome analysis was done by BLASTX searches of the cowpea GSS against four plant proteomes from Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Medicago truncatula, and Populus trichocarpa. The possible exons and introns on each cowpea GSS were predicted using the HMM-based Genscan gene predication program and the potential domains on annotated GSS were analyzed using the HMMER package against the Pfam database. The annotated GSS were also assigned with Gene Ontology annotation terms and integrated with 228 curated plant metabolic pathways from the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) knowledge base. The UniProtKB-Swiss-Prot ENZYME database was used to assign putative enzymatic function to each GSS. Each GSS was also analyzed with the Tandem Repeat Finder (TRF) program in order to identify potential SSRs for molecular marker discovery. The raw sequence data, processed annotation, and SSR results were stored in relational tables designed in key-value pair fashion using a PostgreSQL relational database management system. The biological knowledge derived from the sequence data and processed results are represented as views or materialized views in the relational database management system. All materialized views are indexed for quick data access and retrieval. Data processing and analysis pipelines were implemented using the Perl programming language. The web interface was implemented in JavaScript and Perl CGI running on an Apache web server. The CPU intensive data processing and analysis pipelines were run on a computer cluster of more than 30 dual-processor Apple XServes. A job management system called Vela was created as a robust way to submit large numbers of jobs to the Portable Batch System (PBS). CONCLUSION: CGKB is an integrated and annotated resource for cowpea GSS with features of homology-based and HMM-based annotations, enzyme and pathway annotations, GO term annotation, toolkits, and a large number of other facilities to perform complex queries. The cowpea GSS, chloroplast sequences, mitochondrial sequences, retroelements, and SSR sequences are available as FASTA formatted files and downloadable at CGKB. This database and web interface are publicly accessible at http://cowpeagenomics.med.virginia.edu/CGKB/.
BACKGROUND:Cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] is one of the most important food and forage legumes in the semi-arid tropics because of its ability to tolerate drought and grow on poor soils. It is cultivated mostly by poor farmers in developing countries, with 80% of production taking place in the dry savannah of tropical West and Central Africa. Cowpea is largely an underexploited crop with relatively little genomic information available for use in applied plant breeding. The goal of the Cowpea Genomics Initiative (CGI), funded by the Kirkhouse Trust, a UK-based charitable organization, is to leverage modern molecular genetic tools for gene discovery and cowpea improvement. One aspect of the initiative is the sequencing of the gene-rich region of the cowpea genome (termed the genespace) recovered using methylation filtration technology and providing annotation and analysis of the sequence data. DESCRIPTION: CGKB, Cowpea Genespace/Genomics Knowledge Base, is an annotation knowledge base developed under the CGI. The database is based on information derived from 298,848 cowpea genespace sequences (GSS) isolated by methylation filtering of genomic DNA. The CGKB consists of three knowledge bases: GSS annotation and comparative genomics knowledge base, GSS enzyme and metabolic pathway knowledge base, and GSS simple sequence repeats (SSRs) knowledge base for molecular marker discovery. A homology-based approach was applied for annotations of the GSS, mainly using BLASTX against four public FASTA formatted protein databases (NCBI GenBank Proteins, UniProtKB-Swiss-Prot, UniprotKB-PIR (Protein Information Resource), and UniProtKB-TrEMBL). Comparative genome analysis was done by BLASTX searches of the cowpeaGSS against four plant proteomes from Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa, Medicago truncatula, and Populus trichocarpa. The possible exons and introns on each cowpeaGSS were predicted using the HMM-based Genscan gene predication program and the potential domains on annotated GSS were analyzed using the HMMER package against the Pfam database. The annotated GSS were also assigned with Gene Ontology annotation terms and integrated with 228 curated plant metabolic pathways from the Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) knowledge base. The UniProtKB-Swiss-Prot ENZYME database was used to assign putative enzymatic function to each GSS. Each GSS was also analyzed with the Tandem Repeat Finder (TRF) program in order to identify potential SSRs for molecular marker discovery. The raw sequence data, processed annotation, and SSR results were stored in relational tables designed in key-value pair fashion using a PostgreSQL relational database management system. The biological knowledge derived from the sequence data and processed results are represented as views or materialized views in the relational database management system. All materialized views are indexed for quick data access and retrieval. Data processing and analysis pipelines were implemented using the Perl programming language. The web interface was implemented in JavaScript and Perl CGI running on an Apache web server. The CPU intensive data processing and analysis pipelines were run on a computer cluster of more than 30 dual-processor Apple XServes. A job management system called Vela was created as a robust way to submit large numbers of jobs to the Portable Batch System (PBS). CONCLUSION: CGKB is an integrated and annotated resource for cowpeaGSS with features of homology-based and HMM-based annotations, enzyme and pathway annotations, GO term annotation, toolkits, and a large number of other facilities to perform complex queries. The cowpeaGSS, chloroplast sequences, mitochondrial sequences, retroelements, and SSR sequences are available as FASTA formatted files and downloadable at CGKB. This database and web interface are publicly accessible at http://cowpeagenomics.med.virginia.edu/CGKB/.
Authors: P D Rabinowicz; K Schutz; N Dedhia; C Yordan; L D Parnell; L Stein; W R McCombie; R A Martienssen Journal: Nat Genet Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: C A Whitelaw; W B Barbazuk; G Pertea; A P Chan; F Cheung; Y Lee; L Zheng; S van Heeringen; S Karamycheva; J L Bennetzen; P SanMiguel; N Lakey; J Bedell; Y Yuan; M A Budiman; A Resnick; S Van Aken; T Utterback; S Riedmuller; M Williams; T Feldblyum; K Schubert; R Beachy; C M Fraser; J Quackenbush Journal: Science Date: 2003-12-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: G A Tuskan; S Difazio; S Jansson; J Bohlmann; I Grigoriev; U Hellsten; N Putnam; S Ralph; S Rombauts; A Salamov; J Schein; L Sterck; A Aerts; R R Bhalerao; R P Bhalerao; D Blaudez; W Boerjan; A Brun; A Brunner; V Busov; M Campbell; J Carlson; M Chalot; J Chapman; G-L Chen; D Cooper; P M Coutinho; J Couturier; S Covert; Q Cronk; R Cunningham; J Davis; S Degroeve; A Déjardin; C Depamphilis; J Detter; B Dirks; I Dubchak; S Duplessis; J Ehlting; B Ellis; K Gendler; D Goodstein; M Gribskov; J Grimwood; A Groover; L Gunter; B Hamberger; B Heinze; Y Helariutta; B Henrissat; D Holligan; R Holt; W Huang; N Islam-Faridi; S Jones; M Jones-Rhoades; R Jorgensen; C Joshi; J Kangasjärvi; J Karlsson; C Kelleher; R Kirkpatrick; M Kirst; A Kohler; U Kalluri; F Larimer; J Leebens-Mack; J-C Leplé; P Locascio; Y Lou; S Lucas; F Martin; B Montanini; C Napoli; D R Nelson; C Nelson; K Nieminen; O Nilsson; V Pereda; G Peter; R Philippe; G Pilate; A Poliakov; J Razumovskaya; P Richardson; C Rinaldi; K Ritland; P Rouzé; D Ryaboy; J Schmutz; J Schrader; B Segerman; H Shin; A Siddiqui; F Sterky; A Terry; C-J Tsai; E Uberbacher; P Unneberg; J Vahala; K Wall; S Wessler; G Yang; T Yin; C Douglas; M Marra; G Sandberg; Y Van de Peer; D Rokhsar Journal: Science Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: P SanMiguel; A Tikhonov; Y K Jin; N Motchoulskaia; D Zakharov; A Melake-Berhan; P S Springer; K J Edwards; M Lee; Z Avramova; J L Bennetzen Journal: Science Date: 1996-11-01 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Lance E Palmer; Pablo D Rabinowicz; Andrew L O'Shaughnessy; Vivekanand S Balija; Lidia U Nascimento; Sujit Dike; Melissa de la Bastide; Robert A Martienssen; W Richard McCombie Journal: Science Date: 2003-12-19 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Alex Bateman; Lachlan Coin; Richard Durbin; Robert D Finn; Volker Hollich; Sam Griffiths-Jones; Ajay Khanna; Mhairi Marshall; Simon Moxon; Erik L L Sonnhammer; David J Studholme; Corin Yeats; Sean R Eddy Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2004-01-01 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Paul J Rushton; Marta T Bokowiec; Shengcheng Han; Hongbo Zhang; Jennifer F Brannock; Xianfeng Chen; Thomas W Laudeman; Michael P Timko Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2008-03-12 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Kan Huang; Karolina E Mellor; Shom N Paul; Mark J Lawson; Aaron J Mackey; Michael P Timko Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2012-08-17 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Paul J Rushton; Marta T Bokowiec; Thomas W Laudeman; Jennifer F Brannock; Xianfeng Chen; Michael P Timko Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2008-01-25 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Michael P Timko; Paul J Rushton; Thomas W Laudeman; Marta T Bokowiec; Edmond Chipumuro; Foo Cheung; Christopher D Town; Xianfeng Chen Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2008-02-27 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Lei Li; Hang He; Juan Zhang; Xiangfeng Wang; Sulan Bai; Viktor Stolc; Waraporn Tongprasit; Nevin D Young; Oliver Yu; Xing-Wang Deng Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2008-03-19 Impact factor: 13.583