Literature DB >> 17443953

The impact of climatic variation on the opportunity for sexual selection.

Sean D Twiss1, Christopher Thomas, Veronica Poland, Jeff A Graves, Patrick Pomeroy.   

Abstract

Many studies have demonstrated influences of climatic variation on a variety of ecological processes, however, its impact on the potent evolutionary force of sexual selection has largely been ignored. The intensity of sexual selection is a fundamental parameter in animal populations, which depends upon the degree of polygamy and will probably be influenced by the impact of local climatic variation upon 'environmental potential for polygamy'. Here, we provide evidence of a direct effect of local climatic variation on the intensity of sexual selection, by showing a clear correlation between local weather conditions and inter-annual changes in the degree of polygamy in a long-term study of colonially breeding grey seals (Halichoerus grypus). Our results show that changes in local weather conditions alter the annual proportion of males contributing to the effective population size (Ne) by up to 61%. Consequently, over the 'lifetime' of a cohort, a broader range of individuals will contribute genetically to the next generation if local weather conditions are variable. In the context of predicted future changes in climatic variation, these findings have broad implications for population genetics of socially structured animal systems through the major influence that the degree of polygamy has upon Ne.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17443953      PMCID: PMC2373809          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  17 in total

1.  Climate change and constraints on breeding.

Authors:  I R Stevenson; D M Bryant
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-07-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change.

Authors:  M S Warren; J K Hill; J A Thomas; J Asher; R Fox; B Huntley; D B Roy; M G Telfer; S Jeffcoate; P Harding; G Jeffcoate; S G Willis; J N Greatorex-Davies; D Moss; C D Thomas
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  Ecological responses to recent climate change.

Authors:  Gian-Reto Walther; Eric Post; Peter Convey; Annette Menzel; Camille Parmesan; Trevor J C Beebee; Jean-Marc Fromentin; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg; Franz Bairlein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Ecological effects of climate fluctuations.

Authors:  Nils Chr Stenseth; Atle Mysterud; Geir Ottersen; James W Hurrell; Kung-Sik Chan; Mauricio Lima
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Demographic and genetic estimates of effective population size (Ne) reveals genetic compensation in steelhead trout.

Authors:  William R Ardren; Anne R Kapuscinski
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Large-scale geographical variation confirms that climate change causes birds to lay earlier.

Authors:  Christiaan Both; Aleksandr V Artemyev; Bert Blaauw; Richard J Cowie; Aarnoud J Dekhuijzen; Tapio Eeva; Anders Enemar; Lars Gustafsson; Elena V Ivankina; Antero Järvinen; Neil B Metcalfe; N Erik I Nyholm; Jaime Potti; Pierre-Alain Ravussin; Juan Jose Sanz; Bengt Silverin; Fred M Slater; Leonid V Sokolov; János Török; Wolfgang Winkel; Jonathan Wright; Herwig Zang; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Sexual selection predicts advancement of avian spring migration in response to climate change.

Authors:  Claire N Spottiswoode; Anders P Tøttrup; Timothy Coppack
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Effective population size and population subdivision in demographically structured populations.

Authors:  Valérie Laporte; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Genetic consequences of polygyny and social structure in an Indian fruit bat, Cynopterus sphinx. II. Variance in male mating success and effective population size.

Authors:  J F Storz; H R Bhat; T H Kunz
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Sexual selection, temperature, and the lion's mane.

Authors:  Peyton M West; Craig Packer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  11 in total

1.  Differences in the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection among fitness components in the wild.

Authors:  Adam M Siepielski; Joseph D DiBattista; Jeffrey A Evans; Stephanie M Carlson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Sexual selection mediated by the thermoregulatory effects of male colour pattern in the ambush bug Phymata americana.

Authors:  David Punzalan; F Helen Rodd; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The influence of persistent individual differences and age at maturity on effective population size.

Authors:  Aline Magdalena Lee; Steinar Engen; Bernt-Erik Sæther
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Six Principles for Embracing Gender and Sexual Diversity in Postsecondary Biology Classrooms.

Authors:  Ash T Zemenick; Shaun Turney; Alex J Webster; Sarah C Jones; Marjorie G Weber
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 11.566

5.  Successful breeding predicts divorce in plovers.

Authors:  Naerhulan Halimubieke; Krisztina Kupán; José O Valdebenito; Vojtěch Kubelka; María Cristina Carmona-Isunza; Daniel Burgas; Daniel Catlin; James J H St Clair; Jonathan Cohen; Jordi Figuerola; Maï Yasué; Matthew Johnson; Mauro Mencarelli; Medardo Cruz-López; Michelle Stantial; Michael A Weston; Penn Lloyd; Pinjia Que; Tomás Montalvo; Udita Bansal; Grant C McDonald; Yang Liu; András Kosztolányi; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Reduced sexual size dimorphism in a pipefish population where males do not prefer larger females.

Authors:  Mário Cunha; Nídia Macedo; Jonathan Wilson; Gunilla Rosenqvist; Anders Berglund; Nuno Monteiro
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Stronger sexual selection in warmer waters: the case of a sex role reversed pipefish.

Authors:  Nuno M Monteiro; David O Lyons
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Environmental quality alters female costs and benefits of evolving under enforced monogamy.

Authors:  Vera M Grazer; Marco Demont; Łukasz Michalczyk; Matthew J G Gage; Oliver Y Martin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Investigating climate change and reproduction: experimental tools from evolutionary biology.

Authors:  Vera M Grazer; Oliver Y Martin
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2012-09-13

10.  Same school, different conduct: rates of multiple paternity vary within a mixed-species breeding school of semi-pelagic cichlid fish (Cyprichromis spp.).

Authors:  Caleb Anderson; Alexandra Werdenig; Stephan Koblmüller; Kristina M Sefc
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.