Literature DB >> 32968190

Successful breeding predicts divorce in plovers.

Naerhulan Halimubieke1, Krisztina Kupán2, José O Valdebenito3, Vojtěch Kubelka3,4,5,6, María Cristina Carmona-Isunza3,7, Daniel Burgas8, Daniel Catlin9, James J H St Clair10, Jonathan Cohen11, Jordi Figuerola12, Maï Yasué13, Matthew Johnson14, Mauro Mencarelli15, Medardo Cruz-López16, Michelle Stantial11, Michael A Weston17, Penn Lloyd18, Pinjia Que19,20,21,22, Tomás Montalvo23, Udita Bansal24, Grant C McDonald25,26, Yang Liu27, András Kosztolányi25, Tamás Székely3,4,19,27.   

Abstract

When individuals breed more than once, parents are faced with the choice of whether to re-mate with their old partner or divorce and select a new mate. Evolutionary theory predicts that, following successful reproduction with a given partner, that partner should be retained for future reproduction. However, recent work in a polygamous bird, has instead indicated that successful parents divorced more often than failed breeders (Halimubieke et al. in Ecol Evol 9:10734-10745, 2019), because one parent can benefit by mating with a new partner and reproducing shortly after divorce. Here we investigate whether successful breeding predicts divorce using data from 14 well-monitored populations of plovers (Charadrius spp.). We show that successful nesting leads to divorce, whereas nest failure leads to retention of the mate for follow-up breeding. Plovers that divorced their partners and simultaneously deserted their broods produced more offspring within a season than parents that retained their mate. Our work provides a counterpoint to theoretical expectations that divorce is triggered by low reproductive success, and supports adaptive explanations of divorce as a strategy to improve individual reproductive success. In addition, we show that temperature may modulate these costs and benefits, and contribute to dynamic variation in patterns of divorce across plover breeding systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32968190      PMCID: PMC7511398          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-72521-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  35 in total

1.  The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 2.  Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: lessons for ecology and evolution.

Authors:  John C Avise; Adam G Jones; DeEtte Walker; J Andrew DeWoody
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2002-06-11       Impact factor: 16.830

3.  Sexual selection explains Rensch's rule of size dimorphism in shorebirds.

Authors:  Tamás Székely; Robert P Freckleton; John D Reynolds
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.

Authors:  Bryan D Neff; Trevor E Pitcher
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Do Wolbachia-associated incompatibilities promote polyandry?

Authors:  Fleur E Champion de Crespigny; Laurence D Hurst; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding system evolution.

Authors:  T Székely; F J Weissing; J Komdeur
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 7.  Trading up: the fitness consequences of divorce in monogamous birds.

Authors:  Antica Culina; Reinder Radersma; Ben C Sheldon
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2014-10-10

8.  Changed environmental conditions weaken sexual selection in sticklebacks.

Authors:  U Candolin; T Salesto; M Evers
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  Sex-biased predation by polecats influences the mating system of frogs.

Authors:  Thierry Lodé; Marie-Jeanne Holveck; David Lesbarrères; Alain Pagano
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Fluctuating environments, sexual selection and the evolution of flexible mate choice in birds.

Authors:  Carlos A Botero; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dispersal distance is driven by habitat availability and reproductive success in Northern Great Plains piping plovers.

Authors:  Rose J Swift; Michael J Anteau; Kristen S Ellis; Megan M Ring; Mark H Sherfy; Dustin L Toy
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 3.600

2.  Causes and consequences of pair-bond disruption in a sex-skewed population of a long-lived monogamous seabird.

Authors:  Ruijiao Sun; Christophe Barbraud; Henri Weimerskirch; Karine Delord; Samantha C Patrick; Hal Caswell; Stephanie Jenouvrier
Journal:  Ecol Monogr       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 9.814

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.