Literature DB >> 15296809

Special populations recruitment for the Women's Health Initiative: successes and limitations.

Mona N Fouad1, Giselle Corbie-Smith, David Curb, Barbara V Howard, Charles Mouton, Michael Simon, Greg Talavera, Joanice Thompson, Ching-Yun Wang, Cornelia White, Rosalie Young.   

Abstract

The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) is a study designed to examine the major causes of death and disability in women. This multi-arm, randomized, controlled trial of over 160,000 post-menopausal women of varying ethnic and socioeconomic backgrounds and a goal of 20% of the study participants from minority populations is perhaps one of the most challenging recruitment efforts ever undertaken. Of the two main study arms, the Clinical Trial (CT) and the Observational Study (OS), the CT arm recruitment goal was to randomize 64,500 postmenopausal women 50-79 years of age. Women enrolled in the study will be followed for a period of 8-12 years. Ten clinical centers, out of a total of 40 throughout the United States, were selected as minority recruitment centers on the basis of their history of interaction with and access to large numbers of women from certain population subgroups. WHI enrollment began in September 1993 and ended in December 1998, resulting in the randomization and enrollment of a total of 161,856 (17.5% minority) women participants (68,135 (18.5% minority) in the CT and 93,721 (16.7%) in the OS). Within the CT arm, WHI achieved 101.7% of the goal of 48,000 participants in the Dietary Modification (DM) component, and 99.4% of the goal of 27,500 in the hormone-replacement component (HRT), with 11.8% overlap between DM and HRT. Of those who expressed initial interest in WHI, African Americans had the highest randomization yields in the DM component and Hispanics had the highest in the HRT component (15.2% and 10.2%, respectively). Overall, mass mailing was the greatest source of randomized participants. In addition, minority clinics found community outreach, personal referrals, and culturally appropriate recruitment materials particularly effective recruitment tools. For minority recruitment, our findings suggest that the key to high yield is reaching the target population through appropriate recruitment strategies and study information that get their attention. Also, once minority subjects are reached, they tend to participate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15296809     DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.03.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  29 in total

1.  Association of Race, Ethnicity and Language with Participation in Mental Health Research Among Adult Patients in Primary Care.

Authors:  Trina E Chang; Charlotte D Brill; Lara Traeger; C Andres Bedoya; Aya Inamori; Patrick N Hagan; Katherine Flaherty; Katherine Hails; Albert Yeung; Nhi-Ha Trinh
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2015-12

2.  Attributes of researchers and their strategies to recruit minority populations: results of a national survey.

Authors:  Sandra Crouse Quinn; James Butler; Craig S Fryer; Mary A Garza; Kevin H Kim; Christopher Ryan; Stephen B Thomas
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  The Tuskegee Legacy Project: willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical research.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; S Steven Kegeles; Nancy R Kressin; B Lee Green; Min Qi Wang; Sherman A James; Stefanie Luise Russell; Cristina Claudio
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2006-11

4.  Willingness of minorities to participate in biomedical studies: confirmatory findings from a follow-up study using the Tuskegee Legacy Project Questionnaire.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; B Lee Green; Nancy R Kressin; Cristina Claudio; Min Qi Wang; Stefanie L Russell
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 5.  Recruitment and retention of patients into emergency medicine clinical trials.

Authors:  Stacey S Cofield; Robin Conwit; William Barsan; James Quinn
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.451

6.  EDICT policy recommendations support protection of research participants.

Authors:  Wanda K Jones
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Disparities in vascular surgery: is it biology or environment?

Authors:  Louis L Nguyen; Antonia J Henry
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Participant recruitment and retention in a pilot program to prevent weight gain in low-income overweight and obese mothers.

Authors:  Mei-Wei Chang; Roger Brown; Susan Nitzke
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  Identifying the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: implications of results from recall and recognition questions.

Authors:  Ralph V Katz; Germain Jean-Charles; B Lee Green; Nancy R Kressin; Cristina Claudio; Minqi Wang; Stefanie L Russell; Jason Outlaw
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Hormones and dementia - a comparative study of hormonal impairment in post-menopausal women, with and without dementia.

Authors:  Olívia Robusto-Leitao; H Ferreira
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.