Literature DB >> 17438774

Importance of dissolved neutral mercury sulfides for methyl mercury production in contaminated sediments.

Andreas Drott1, Lars Lambertsson, Erik Björn, Ulf Skyllberg.   

Abstract

Biotic transformation of inorganic mercury, Hg(II), to mono methyl mercury (MeHg) is proposed to be largely controlled by passive uptake of neutral Hg complexes by sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB). In this study, the chemical speciation of Hg(II) in seven locally contaminated sediments covering environments such as (i) brackish water, (ii) low-productivity freshwater, and, (iii) high-productivity freshwater was related to potential Hg methylation rates, determined by incubation at 23 degrees C for 48 h under N2(g), and to total MeHg concentrations in sediments. Pore water speciation was modeled considering Hg complexes with halides, organic thiols [Hg(SR)2(aq), associated to dissolved organic matter], monosulfides, and bisulfides. The sum of neutral mercury sulfides [Hg(SH)20(aq)] and [HgS0(aq)] was significantly, positively (p < 0.001, n = 20) correlated to the specific methylation rate constant (Km, day(-1)) at depths of 5-100 cm in two brackish water sediments. Total Hg, total mercury sulfides or Hg(SR)2(aq) in pore water gave no significant relationships with Km. In two subsets of freshwater sediments, neutral mercury sulfides were positively correlated to total Hg in pore water, and therefore, total Hg also gave significant relationships with Km. The sum of [Hg(SH)20(aq)] and [HgS0(aq)] was significantly, positively correlated to total sediment MeHg (microg kg-1) in brackish waters (p < 0.001, n = 23), in southern, high-productivity freshwaters (p < 0.001, n = 20), as well as in northern, low-productivity freshwater (p = 0.048, n = 6). The slopes (b, b') of the relationships Km (day-1) = a + b([Hg(SH)20(aq)] + [HgS0(aq)]) and MeHg (microg kg-1) = a' + b'([Hg(SH)20(aq)] + [HgS0(aq)]) showed an inverse relationship with the C/N ratio, supposedly reflecting differences in primary production and energy-rich organic matter availability among sites. We conclude that concentrations of neutral inorganic mercury sulfide species, together with the availability of energy-rich organic matter, largely control Hg methylation rates in contaminated sediments. Furthermore, Hg(SH)20(aq) is suggested to be the dominant species taken up by MeHg producing bacteria in organic-rich sediments without formation of HgS(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17438774     DOI: 10.1021/es061724z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  21 in total

1.  Sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation.

Authors:  Cynthia C Gilmour; Dwayne A Elias; Amy M Kucken; Steven D Brown; Anthony V Palumbo; Christopher W Schadt; Judy D Wall
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-22       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Total mercury and methylmercury distributions in surface sediments from Kongsfjorden, Svalbard, Norwegian Arctic.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Xiaoli Chai; Yongxia Hao; Xiaofeng Gao; Zhibo Lu; Youcai Zhao; Jie Zhang; Minghong Cai
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Biogeochemical controls on mercury methylation in the Allequash Creek wetland.

Authors:  Joel E Creswell; Martin M Shafer; Christopher L Babiarz; Sue-Zanne Tan; Abbey L Musinsky; Trevor H Schott; Eric E Roden; David E Armstrong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 4.  Rice methylmercury exposure and mitigation: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Sarah E Rothenberg; Lisamarie Windham-Myers; Joel E Creswell
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 6.498

5.  Non-invasive biomonitoring of mercury in birds near thermal power plants: lessons from Maharashtra, India.

Authors:  Sunidhi Thakur; Shalini Dhyani; Kavita Bramhanwade; Krishna Kumar Pandey; Naresh Bokade; Ramesh Janipella; Paras Pujari
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 2.513

6.  Linking landscape development intensity within watersheds to methyl-mercury accumulation in river sediments.

Authors:  Jean-Claude J Bonzongo; Augustine K Donkor; Attibayeba Attibayeba; Jie Gao
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Detailed assessment of the kinetics of Hg-cell association, Hg methylation, and methylmercury degradation in several Desulfovibrio species.

Authors:  Andrew M Graham; Allyson L Bullock; Andrew C Maizel; Dwayne A Elias; Cynthia C Gilmour
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Relative contributions of mercury bioavailability and microbial growth rate on net methylmercury production by anaerobic mixed cultures.

Authors:  Katarzyna H Kucharzyk; Marc A Deshusses; Kaitlyn A Porter; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 4.238

9.  Sediment-porewater partitioning, total sulfur, and methylmercury production in estuaries.

Authors:  Amina T Schartup; Prentiss H Balcom; Robert P Mason
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Thiol-Based Selective Extraction Assay to Comparatively Assess Bioavailable Mercury in Sediments.

Authors:  Jonathan L Ticknor; Katarzyna H Kucharzyk; Kaitlyn A Porter; Marc A Deshusses; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Eng Sci       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.907

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.