Literature DB >> 26211614

Relative contributions of mercury bioavailability and microbial growth rate on net methylmercury production by anaerobic mixed cultures.

Katarzyna H Kucharzyk1, Marc A Deshusses, Kaitlyn A Porter, Heileen Hsu-Kim.   

Abstract

Monomethylmercury (MeHg) is produced in many aquatic environments by anaerobic microorganisms that take up and methylate inorganic forms of Hg(II). Net methylation of Hg(II) appears to be correlated with factors that affect the activity of the anaerobic microbial community and factors that increase the bioavailability of Hg(II) to these organisms. However, the relative importance of one versus the other is difficult to elucidate even though this information can greatly assist remediation efforts and risk assessments. Here, we investigated the effects of Hg speciation (dissolved Hg and nanoparticulate HgS) and microbial activity on the net production of MeHg using two mixed microbial cultures that were enriched from marine sediments under sulfate reducing conditions. The cultures were amended with dissolved Hg (added as a dissolved nitrate salt) and nanoparticulate HgS, and grown under different carbon substrate concentrations. The results indicated that net mercury methylation was the highest for cultures incubated in the greatest carbon substrate concentration (60 mM) compared to incubations with less carbon (0.6 and 6 mM), regardless of the form of mercury amended. Net MeHg production in cultures exposed to HgS nanoparticles was significantly slower than in cultures exposed to dissolved Hg; however, the difference diminished with slower growing cultures with low carbon addition (0.6 mM). The net Hg methylation rate was found to correlate with sulfate reduction rate in cultures exposed to dissolved Hg, while methylation rate was roughly constant for cultures exposed to nanoparticulate HgS. These results indicated a potential threshold of microbial productivity: below this point net MeHg production was limited by microbial activity, regardless of Hg bioavailability. Above this threshold of productivity, Hg speciation became a contributing factor towards net MeHg production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26211614      PMCID: PMC4782143          DOI: 10.1039/c5em00174a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts        ISSN: 2050-7887            Impact factor:   4.238


  26 in total

1.  Methylation of mercury by bacteria exposed to dissolved, nanoparticulate, and microparticulate mercuric sulfides.

Authors:  Tong Zhang; Bojeong Kim; Clément Levard; Brian C Reinsch; Gregory V Lowry; Marc A Deshusses; Heileen Hsu-Kim
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Enzymatic reactions involving sulfate, sulfite, selenate, and molybdate.

Authors:  L G WILSON; R S BANDURSKI
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1958-10       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Mercury methylation by novel microorganisms from new environments.

Authors:  Cynthia C Gilmour; Mircea Podar; Allyson L Bullock; Andrew M Graham; Steven D Brown; Anil C Somenahally; Alex Johs; Richard A Hurt; Kathryn L Bailey; Dwayne A Elias
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Monitoring the response to changing mercury deposition.

Authors:  Robert P Mason; Michael L Abbott; R A Bodaly; O Russell Bullock; Charles T Driscoll; David Evers; Steven E Lindberg; Michael Murray; Edward B Swain
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 5.  Recovery of mercury-contaminated fisheries.

Authors:  John Munthe; R A Drew Bodaly; Brian A Branfireun; Charles T Driscoll; Cynthia C Gilmour; Reed Harris; Milena Horvat; Marc Lucotte; Olaf Malm
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.129

6.  Methylmercury in freshwater fish linked to atmospheric mercury deposition.

Authors:  Chad R Hammerschmid; William F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  The genetic basis for bacterial mercury methylation.

Authors:  Jerry M Parks; Alexander Johs; Mircea Podar; Romain Bridou; Richard A Hurt; Steven D Smith; Stephen J Tomanicek; Yun Qian; Steven D Brown; Craig C Brandt; Anthony V Palumbo; Jeremy C Smith; Judy D Wall; Dwayne A Elias; Liyuan Liang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Methanogens: principal methylators of mercury in lake periphyton.

Authors:  Stéphanie Hamelin; Marc Amyot; Tamar Barkay; Yanping Wang; Dolors Planas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Mercury methylation rates for geochemically relevant Hg(II) species in sediments.

Authors:  Sofi Jonsson; Ulf Skyllberg; Mats B Nilsson; Per-Olof Westlund; Andrey Shchukarev; Erik Lundberg; Erik Björn
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 9.028

10.  Geochemical controls on the production and distribution of methylmercury in near-shore marine sediments.

Authors:  Chad R Hammerschmidt; William F Fitzgerald
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

View more
  5 in total

1.  Enhanced availability of mercury bound to dissolved organic matter for methylation in marine sediments.

Authors:  Nashaat M Mazrui; Sofi Jonsson; Sravan Thota; Jing Zhao; Robert P Mason
Journal:  Geochim Cosmochim Acta       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 5.010

2.  Challenges and opportunities for managing aquatic mercury pollution in altered landscapes.

Authors:  Heileen Hsu-Kim; Chris S Eckley; Dario Achá; Xinbin Feng; Cynthia C Gilmour; Sofi Jonsson; Carl P J Mitchell
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.129

3.  Co-culturing experiments reveal the uptake of myo-inositol phosphate synthase (EC 5.5.1.4) in an inositol auxotroph of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Erika Steele; Hana D Alebous; Macy Vickers; Mary E Harris; Margaret D Johnson
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 5.328

4.  Carbon Amendments Alter Microbial Community Structure and Net Mercury Methylation Potential in Sediments.

Authors:  Geoff A Christensen; Anil C Somenahally; James G Moberly; Carrie M Miller; Andrew J King; Cynthia C Gilmour; Steven D Brown; Mircea Podar; Craig C Brandt; Scott C Brooks; Anthony V Palumbo; Judy D Wall; Dwayne A Elias
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Mercury in the Black Sea: New Insights From Measurements and Numerical Modeling.

Authors:  G Rosati; L E Heimbürger; D Melaku Canu; C Lagane; L Laffont; M J A Rijkenberg; L J A Gerringa; C Solidoro; C N Gencarelli; I M Hedgecock; H J W De Baar; J E Sonke
Journal:  Global Biogeochem Cycles       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.703

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.