Literature DB >> 17438704

A short communication course for physicians improves the quality of patient information in a clinical trial.

Päivi S Hietanen1, Arja R Aro, Kaija A Holli, Marjut Schreck, Anni Peura, Heikki T Joensuu.   

Abstract

We investigated whether a short course in communication skills for physicians would improve the quality of informed consent in a randomized clinical adjuvant trial on breast cancer. In this prospective, case-controlled intervention study, physicians and research nurses who introduced the cancer treatment trial to patients at three of the participating hospitals first attended a one-day communication skills course. The quality of informed consent was then evaluated by addressing a standardized questionnaire, QuIC, to trial patients at the three intervention hospitals and at control hospitals. Response rate was 90.0% (n = 288). Of the patients treated by the intervention group, 73% were very satisfied with the information received compared with 56% of those of the control group (p = 0.003). The patients of the intervention group considered the time given for making their decision sufficient more often than those of the controls (98% vs. 90%, p = 0.004). The patients of the intervention group recalled more often than those of the controls that the physician had also offered other therapeutic options than the trial treatment (91% vs. 97%, p = 0.032). They also understood the main aim of the study better than the patients of the controls (89% vs. 78%, p = 0.030). In conclusion, a short communication skills course for the trial physicians and nurses improved the quality of informed consent and patient satisfaction in the trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17438704     DOI: 10.1080/02841860600849067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  18 in total

1.  Aspects of mental health communication skills training that predict parent and child outcomes in pediatric primary care.

Authors:  Lawrence Wissow; Anne Gadomski; Debra Roter; Susan Larson; Barry Lewis; Jonathan Brown
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-05-05

2.  Effect of prior cancer on outcomes in advanced lung cancer: implications for clinical trial eligibility and accrual.

Authors:  Andrew L Laccetti; Sandi L Pruitt; Lei Xuan; Ethan A Halm; David E Gerber
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Power of an effective clinical conversation: improving accrual onto clinical trials.

Authors:  Linda K Parreco; Rhonda W DeJoice; Holly A Massett; Rose Mary Padberg; Sona S Thakkar
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Impact of prior cancer on eligibility for lung cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Andrew L Laccetti; Lei Xuan; Ethan A Halm; Sandi L Pruitt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Thoracic Oncology Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria and Requirements Continue to Increase in Number and Complexity.

Authors:  Sandra Garcia; Ajit Bisen; Jingsheng Yan; Xian-Jin Xie; Suresh Ramalingam; Joan H Schiller; David H Johnson; David E Gerber
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 15.609

Review 6.  Can Patient-Provider Interpersonal Interventions Achieve the Quadruple Aim of Healthcare? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marie C Haverfield; Aaron Tierney; Rachel Schwartz; Michelle B Bass; Cati Brown-Johnson; Dani L Zionts; Nadia Safaeinili; Meredith Fischer; Jonathan G Shaw; Sonoo Thadaney; Gabriella Piccininni; Karl A Lorenz; Steven M Asch; Abraham Verghese; Donna M Zulman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Potential curability and perception of received information in esophageal cancer patients.

Authors:  Eleonora Pinto; Francesco Cavallin; Luca Maria Saadeh; Maria Cristina Bellissimo; Rita Alfieri; Silvia Mantoan; Matteo Cagol; Carlo Castoro; Marco Scarpa
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Satisfaction with care among low-income women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Amardeep Thind; Lalima Hoq; Allison Diamant; Rose C Maly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.681

9.  Consent timing and experience: modifiable factors that may influence interest in clinical research.

Authors:  David E Gerber; Drew W Rasco; Celette Sugg Skinner; Jonathan E Dowell; Jingsheng Yan; Jennifer R Sayne; Yang Xie
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.840

10.  The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations.

Authors:  Andrea M Denicoff; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Stephen S Grubbs; Suanna S Bruinooge; Robert L Comis; Peggy Devine; David M Dilts; Michelle E Duff; Jean G Ford; Steven Joffe; Lidia Schapira; Kevin P Weinfurt; Margo Michaels; Derek Raghavan; Ellen S Richmond; Robin Zon; Terrance L Albrecht; Michael A Bookman; Afshin Dowlati; Rebecca A Enos; Mona N Fouad; Marjorie Good; William J Hicks; Patrick J Loehrer; Alan P Lyss; Steven N Wolff; Debra M Wujcik; Neal J Meropol
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.